Neolebouria pallenisca ( Shipley & Hornell, 1905 ) Shipley & Hornell, 1905

Martin, Storm B., Cutmore, Scott C., Ward, Selina & Cribb, Thomas H., 2017, An updated concept and revised composition for Hamacreadium Linton, 1910 (Opecoelidae: Plagioporinae) clarifies a previously obscured pattern of host-specificity among species, Zootaxa 4254 (2), pp. 151-187 : 176

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4254.2.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0BDF72E4-5330-4EE7-8560-DF44E71C1F41

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6048985

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/436E87B5-BE7F-5559-FF67-FBDCFDDF4D2C

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Neolebouria pallenisca ( Shipley & Hornell, 1905 )
status

comb. nov.

Neolebouria pallenisca ( Shipley & Hornell, 1905) View in CoL n. comb.

Synonyms: Distoma palleniscum Shipley & Hornell, 1905 ; Plagioporus palleniscus ( Shipley & Hornell, 1905) Yamaguti, 1952 ; Hamacreadium palleniscum ( Shipley & Hornell, 1905) Yamaguti, 1953 .

Records. From a “filefish or triggerfish, Balistes sp.” off Sri Lanka by Shipley & Hornell (1905) as D. palleniscum .

Remarks. The excretory vesicle was not described in this species, and the ovary is tri-lobed. The genital pore is distinctly post-bifurcal, but also inter-caecal, and it therefore is most similar to species of Neolebouria belonging to the “maorum” body-type of Dronen et al. (2014). Notably, one of these species, Neolebouria cantherini ( Li, Qiu & Zhang, 1988) Cribb, 2005 , is known from a monacanthid (i.e. a filefish), and another, N. capoori , from Indian waters. Neolebouria pallenisca n. comb. is distinguishable from other Neolebouria species of the “maorum” bodytype by its larger size, at 5,000 µm long.

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF