Neoparaphytoseius sooretamus
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3700.3.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:72725A42-1F33-43E5-924D-DA3C66929734 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6154267 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/440987E7-2F0E-FF87-D7E1-5F5DFB79FB20 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Neoparaphytoseius sooretamus |
status |
|
Neoparaphytoseius sooretamus View in CoL (El- Banhawy)
Amblyseius sooretamus El-Banhawy, 1984: 128.
Amblyseiulella sooretama .—Moraes et al., 1986: 5; Zacarias & Moraes, 2001: 580.
Neoparaphytoseius sooretamus .—Chant & McMurtry, 2003: 215; Moraes et al., 2004b: 98; Chant & McMurtry, 2007: 49.
Specimens examined. Pariquera-Açu, February 2001, 3 females on Rubus brasiliensis Mart. ; Pariquera-Açu, March 2001, 9 females on R. brasiliensis ; Pariquera-Açu, April 2001, 20 females on unidentified Fabaceae and Pariquera-Açu, October 2001, 12 females on Rubus urticaefolius Poir.
Previous records. Brazil [States of Espirito Santo and São Paulo (Moraes et al., 2004b); Paraíba (Furtado et al., 2005) and Mato Grosso do Sul (Rezende & Lofego, 2011)].
Remarks. The measurements of six adult females collected in this study fit the original description. In a redescription of the species based on specimens from São Paulo, Zacarias & Moraes (2001) reported that some dorsal setae were shorter (j 1 30–32, z2 8–9, z4 11 and S 5 11 –14) and Sge IV was longer (65–73) than reported in the original description (j1 36, z2 14, z4 14, S5 16 and Sge IV 59). In the specimens examined in this study, the ranges of the lengths of those setae (j 1 29–35, z 2 8–11, z 4 12–16, S 5 12 –15 and Sge IV 54–78) are in between or partially overlap the values given in the original description and those of Zacarias & Moraes (2001). As also mentioned by Zacarias & Moraes (2001), the specimens collected in this study have dorsal shield with less conspicuous lateral notches at level of s4 than reported in the original description. In addition, the fixed cheliceral digit has more teeth (14–15) than reported by Zacarias & Moraes (2001) (11–13) and in the original description (7).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |