Stenaspis verticalis Audinet-Serville, 1834
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5041512 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:37900822-FF60-4386-BF30-9434678DD39B |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/445E87AE-2B43-FF9A-FF06-88D7E099FE8E |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Stenaspis verticalis Audinet-Serville, 1834 |
status |
|
Stenaspis verticalis Audinet-Serville, 1834 View in CoL
( Fig. 103–136 View Figures 103–120 View Figures 121–136 )
Stenaspis verticalis Audinet-Serville 1834: 52 View in CoL ; Dupont 1838: 51; Castelnau 1840: 419; Guérin-Méneville 1844: 218 (syn.); White 1853: 78 (syn.); Strauch 1861: 127 (cat.); Thomson 1864: 208; Lacordaire 1869: 171; Chenu 1870, 311; Gemminger and Harold 1872: 2967 (cat.); Bates 1880: 76 (dist.), 1885: 321 (dist.); Leng 1886: 62; Townsend 1895: 47 (dist.); Fall and Cockerell 1907: 192 (dist.); Casey 1912: 319; Aurivillius 1912: 458 (cat.); Perkins and Swezey 1924: 51 (host.); Smyth 1934: 117 (biol.); Blackwelder 1946: 589 (cat.); Gibson and Carrillo 1959: 120 (dist.); Linsley 1962: 98; Chemsak et al. 1980: 33 (dist.); Terrón 1992: 288 (dist.); Chemsak et al. 1992: 86 (cat.); Chemsak and Noguera 1993: 64 (dist.); Napp 1994: 279; Monné 1994: 35 (cat.); Monné and Giesbert 1994: 152 (cat.); Noguera and Chemsak 1996: 403 (dist.); Noguera et al. 2002: 624 (dist.); Turnbow et al. 2003: 18 (dist.); Hovore 2006: 374 (dist.); Noguera et al. 2007: 312 (dist.); Maes et al. 2010: 618 (dist.); Garcia Morales et al. 2014: 106 (dist.); Noguera and Gutiérrez 2016: 659 (dist.).
Trachyderes superbus Newman 1838: 493 View in CoL .
Redescription. Male: Length 17–33 mm. Form large, robust; integument reddish-brown to black; head, pronotum, and appendages at least partly red or bright reddish-orange, elytra metallic blue, green or purple, scutellum
103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120
all black or basal half brownish and apically black. Head with vertex and frons rugulose, irregularly punctate, glabrate; mandibles with apices acute; genae irregularly punctate; sparsely covered with appressed pubescence; antennal tubercles prominent, apices acute; eyes moderately large, finely faceted, upper lobes small, well separated; antennae elongate, 11-segmented, exceeding elytral apices by about four segments, scape conical, coarsely separately to irregularly punctate with very short, depressed hair arising from each puncture; apices of antennomere III–VII slightly enlarged and expanded; antennomeres from apex of III laterally carinate with poriferous area on either side of carina, dorsum of antennomeres III–VI glabrate, nitid, finely, sparsely, irregularly punctate, apices densely punctate and densely clothed with short, black depressed hairs, antennomeres from VII densely clothed with short appressed pubescence; antennomere III longer than I, IV shorter than III, V longer than IV, VI subequal to V, VII subequal to VI, VIII subequal to or shorter than VII, IX shorter than VIII, X shorter than IX, XI longest, appendiculate at apical two-fifth. Pronotum 1.5–1.6 times as broad as long, rounded to broadly angulate at sides; anterior angles inflated, broadly rounded; disc with dorsal calli vague, two in anterior half on either side of middle, and three in basal half, one in middle and one each on either side; area between calli flattened, surface coarsely, irregularly punctate, sparsely covered with whitish, transparent hairs; proepisternum inflated, finely, very densely punctate, sparsely pubescent, and demarcated from prosternum and coarsely punctate pronotal disc; prosternum transversely rugose with finely densely punctate transverse subrectangular impressed area on each side of middle; prosternal intercoxal process nitid, irregularly punctate; mesosternum with surface nitid, anterior half and on sides finely, densely, minutely punctate and densely pubescent with appressed, transparent hairs, posterior half sparsely, irregularly punctate in middle; mesosternal intercoxal process sparsely pubescent on sides; metasternum nitid, sparsely punctate, and sparsely pubescent with long, depressed, whitish hairs, sides occasionally densely pubescent; metepisternum densely, minutely punctate, densely pubescent with whitish, depressed hairs. Elytra about 2.2–2.4 times longer than broad, distinctly margined laterally; disc finely to coarsely punctate. Legs with femora slightly clavate, finely, sparsely to coarsely punctate, surface sparsely clothed with short, depressed hairs, outer margin with short, depressed bristles; tibiae slender, surface glabrate, sparsely to coarsely, densely punctate and sparsely covered with short, depressed hairs, inner margin with a row of short, depressed bristles in apical half. Abdomen glabrate, finely, shallowly and rather sparsely punctate in middle, sparsely pubescent with suberect hairs, sides more finely, densely punctate, densely pubescent with appressed, short hairs; fifth sternite truncate to broadly, shallowly emarginate at apex.
Female: 19–37 mm. Form similar to male, head, pronotum and appendages similar in coloration to male; antennae reaching apical fifth of elytra to attaining apices, scape conical, coarsely, separately punctate to finely, separately punctate; apices of antennomeres III–VI slightly enlarged, VII–XI gradually flattened, apices expanded and angulate; antennomere III longer than I, IV shorter than III, V shorter than III, VI subequal to V, antennomeres from VII–X progressively shorter, XI longer than X and subequal to IX, appendiculate at apical quarter. Pronotum laterally tuberculate in middle; anterior angles with obtuse callus on each side; disc finely, sparsely, irregularly punctate to coarsely, contiguously punctate, sparsely covered with transparent, erect hairs; proepisternum coarsely, irregularly punctate and not clearly demarcated from prosternum and pronotal disc as in male; prosternum transversely rugose and coarsely striate-punctate (without finely punctate transverse subrectangular area found in males). Abdomen similar to male, fifth sternite rounded to truncate, shallowly emarginate or vaguely indented at apex.
Materials examined. USA: Texas: Val Verde Co.: near Langtry, 13 Oct. 1994, on Baccharis Linnaeus (Asteraceae) , D.W. Sundberg (1 male, DJHC). MEXICO: Nuevo Leon: 28 km W. Linares Viejo y La Palma, HWY58, 22 Oct. 2004, B.K. EYA (4 females, BKEC). Nayarit: Volcan Ceboruco, 5–15 km W. Jala, 15 Oct. 2001, R.L. Penrose (1 female, LGBC). Jalisco: Est. Biol. Chamela, 1/ 8 July 1988, J.A. Chemsak (1 male, 1 female, BKEC), 23 Oct. 1995, B.K. EYA (1 female, BKEC); Planta La Meza, 13.8 km N.E. San Gabriel, Hwy 432, 18 Oct., B.K. Eya (1 female, BKEC); Ajijic, 1585 m. 11 Sept. 2012, G. Nogueira (1 male, DJHC), 10/ 15 Oct. 1989, D. Curoe (1 male, DJHC); Volcan de Tequila, 1380 m., 25/ 30 Sept. 2012, R. Cunningham, L. Bezark (1 male, 1 female, LGBC). Michoacan: 8.3 km El Puerto (Jct. to Cotija), 19°49′N, 102°37′W, 1800 m., 18 Oct. 1988, A.D. Mudge (1 female, DJHC). Puebla: 22 km N.W. Jct. 190/ 125, 9 km N.W. Oaxaca border, 14 Oct. 2005, B.K. Eya (1 male, BKEC). Guerrero: 23 km W. Iguala, 11/ 16 Sept. 1982, elev. 1040 m., J.A. Chemsak, J.A. Powell (1 female, BKEC). Oaxaca: 1 mi S.E. Tutla, 6500′, 7 Oct. 1977, J. Powell, J. Chemsak, T. Eichlin, and T. Friedlander (1 male, BKEC); 10 km NNE Huajuapan de Leon, 28 Oct. 1990, A.D. Mudge (3 males, 4 females, DJHC, LGBC), 1 Nov. 1990, A. Mudge (3 males,
LGBC), 1 Nov. 1990, A.D. Mudge (1 male, DJHC) ; 12 km NNE Huajuapan de Leon, 1 Nov. 1990, A.D. Mudge (2 males, LGBC) ; 7 km S. Huajuapan de Leon, 1700 m., 28 Oct. 1990, R.L. Westcott (1 female, LGBC) .
Discussion. According to Linsley (1962: 98), this species exhibits considerable geographical variation in color and sculpturing as described by Bates (1885: 321). Stenaspis verticalis males also show considerable allometric variation in the length of antennomeres depending on the size of specimen, where larger individuals (31–33 mm) have antennomere IV longer than III and antennomeres V–X progressively longer, whereas in smaller specimens (17–21 mm) the length of antennomere IV is shorter than III, V longer than IV, VI subequal to or longer than V, and VII–X progressively shorter or subequal to the previous antennomeres. Antennomere XI in males of S. verticalis is the longest and is distinctly appendiculate as though there is a twelfth antennomere but the integument around the appendicular area is definitely fused. In large males (≥ 30 mm) the finely, densely, punctate transverse subrectangular impressed areas on each side of the prosternum are fused in the middle to form one continuous transverse subrectangular impressed area ( Fig. 17 View Figures 15–23 ), whereas in males smaller than 30 mm the transverse subrectangular areas are well separated ( Fig. 20 View Figures 15–23 , 29 View Figures 24–32 ). According to Casey (1912), the holotype of Stenaspis verticalis verticalis Audinet-Serville, 1834 is from Iguala in Guerrero, Mexico although the specific location is not noted by Audinet-Serville (1834) and Dupont (1834) other than just Mexico as the type locality. There are two subspecies named from the USA: Stenaspis verticalis insignis Casey, 1924 , and Stenaspis verticalis arizonicus Casey, 1912 .
Stenaspis verticalis arizonicus Casey, 1912 View in CoL (Type locality: Arizona, USA). Stenaspis verticalis: LeConte 1858: 40 View in CoL (cat.). Stenaspis arizonicus Casey 1912: 318 View in CoL . Stenaspis verticalis arizonicus Linsley 1962: 99 View in CoL ; Chemsak et al. 1992: 86 (cat.); Monné and Giesbert 1994: 152 (cat.); Monné 1994: 35 (cat.); Lingafelter et al. 2014: 20 (holotype); Heffern et al. 2018: 746 (biol.).
Materials examined. USA: Arizona: Pima Co. : Baboquivari Mountains, Brown Canyon , 10/ 11 July 2001, 31°46′ 23″N, 111°33′31″W, W. K. Will (1 male, 1 female, LGBC) GoogleMaps ; Kitt Peak, 6 Aug. 1994, B.K. Eya (1 female, BKEC), Kitt Peak Obs. Rd. on roadside flower, 18 Sept. 1979, C.Y. Kitayama (1 male, LGBC) ; Lower Madera Canyon near old Missile Base , 10 Aug. 1990, R. Duff (1 female, LGBC) ; Kitt Peak Rd. , 1 Sept 1979, L. Bezark, G. Nishida, C. Kitayama, B. Tilden (1 male, LGBC) ; Madera Canyon, 13 Aug. 1988, D. Ahart (1 male, LGBC). Santa Cruz Co.: Pena Blanca Lake , 26 Aug. 1975, L. Bezark, G. Nishida, C. Kitayama, B. Tilden (1 female, LGBC) .
Discussion. According to Linsley (1962: 99), S. v. arizonicus has the elytra finely and densely punctate, usually green or greenish-blue. The pronotum is black and margined posteriorly with red. The ventral surface is reddishbrown or piceous, rarely with any red on metasternum. According to Casey (1912: 319), the very dense sculpture of the elytra is a striking character that differentiates S. v. arizonicus from S. v. verticalis Audinet-Serville. Examination of specimens from Arizona, which is the northwesternmost range of this species, S. v. arizonicus differs from the other subspecies by the darker, duller integument ( Fig. 103–106 View Figures 103–120 , 146 View Figures 146–154 ) and finely, confluently, vermiculate-punctate elytra ( Fig. 137 View Figures 137–145 ). Moving eastward into Texas the punctures on the elytra and scape become coarser, and the integument of the pronotum is more polished, as in the example from Val Verde County, Texas ( Fig. 107–108 View Figures 103–120 , 138 View Figures 137–145 , 147 View Figures 146–154 ).
Stenaspis verticalis insignis Casey, 1924 View in CoL (Type locality: Texas, Comal Co., USA). Stenaspis insignis: Casey 1924: 262 View in CoL ; Vogt 1949: 177 (dist.). Stenaspis verticalis insignis: Linsley 1962: 99 View in CoL ; Hovore et al. 1987: 297 (dist.); Chemsak et al. 1992: 86 (cat.); Monné and Giesbert 1994: 152 (cat.); Monné 1994: 35 (cat.); Lingafelter et al. 2014: 80 (holotype).
Materials examined. USA: Texas: Bexar Co.: Petrenko Rd. 5 Oct. 1994, D.W. Sundberg (1 male, DJHC) ; Camp Bullis, NW. San Antonio , 25 Sept. 1960, E.L. Smith (1 female, LGBC). Medina Co. : 8 mi. W. Median, 15 Sept. 2013, bait, D.W. Sundberg (1 female, DJHC), 4 Oct. 2013, bait, D.W. Sundberg (1 male, DJHC). Comal Co. New Braunfels, 2 Oct. 1984, D. Sundberg (1 female, DJHC) .
Also tentatively assigned to this subspecies are nine additional specimens from Texas as follows: Jim Wells Co.: Premont, 13 Oct. 1984, D.J. Heffern (1 female, DJHC). San Patricio Co.: 4–5 mi. N. Sinton, 12 Oct. 1985, D.J. Heffern (1 female, DJHC); Sinton Area, 9 Nov. 1985, D.J. Heffern (1 male, DJHC). Cameron Co.: Sabal Palm Grove, 25/ 27 Oct. 1986, Heffern and Brattain (1 male, 1 female, DJHC), Hwy 4, Palmito Hill, 21 Oct. 1989, D.J. Heffern (1 female, DJHC); 16 km W. Boca Chica, 24 Oct. 1990, collected from Baccharis Linnaeus (Asteraceae) ,
L.G. Bezark (1 male, 2 females, LGBC).
121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136
Discussion. Examination of specimens of S. v. insignis from the vicinity of San Antonio, Texas (Bexar, Comal, and Medina Counties ), which is the northeasternmost range of this species, shows that this subspecies differs from S. v. verticalis , and S. v. arizonicus by the following characteristics: (1) striking bright reddish coloration of the integument ( Fig. 109–112 View Figures 103–120 ); (2) pronotum that is polished wholly or predominately bright reddish, coarsely, deeply, irregularly punctate, and frequently with two black spots in the anterior half ( Fig. 148 View Figures 146–154 ); (3) prosternum, meso- and metasternum that are mostly or partly reddish; (4) scape and elytra that are coarsely, contiguously punctate ( Fig. 139 View Figures 137–145 , 148 View Figures 146–154 ); and elytra that are usually metallic bluish. The antennae of both sexes of S. v. insignis are shorter than in the other subspecies, and usually about four-fifths the length of the body in females. According to Casey (1924: 263), other than from the overall color of integument, S. v. verticalis differs from S. v. insignis by the sculpture of the elytra where the punctures are well separated. Moving southward from Comal to San Patricio and Cameron Counties in Texas, and further into Nuevo Leon, Mexico, the antennae of both sexes are longer, and in females almost attaining the apex of the elytra or slightly exceeding elytra ( Fig. 115–116 View Figures 103–120 ). Also, there is a darkening of the integument of sternum, proepisternum and pronotal disc (i.e., area which is encompassing the two calli in the anterior half, the middle callus in posterior half, and the anterior margin), and the base of the scape especially in males ( Fig. 113–120 View Figures 103–120 ). A gradual geographical change in metallic coloration of the elytra from blue to greenish is also noticeable.
In general, further south into Mexico (i.e., Nayarit, Jalisco, Michoacán, Guerrero and Puebla) the punctures on the pronotal disc and scape become shallower, finer and sparser ( Fig. 149–153 View Figures 146–154 ), and the basal half of the elytral discs are more separately punctate ( Fig. 140–144 View Figures 137–145 ). There is an exceptional male specimen from Chamela, Jalisco ( Fig. 123–124 View Figures 121–136 , 150 View Figures 146–154 ) with dull reddish integument which resembles S. v. insignis , however, the pronotal disc is coarsely, shallowly and contiguously punctate ( Fig. 150 View Figures 146–154 ) and the elytral disc is finely, separately punctate ( Fig. 141 View Figures 137–145 ). Stenaspis v. insignis has a polished pronotal disc that is coarsely, deeply and irregularly punctate, and the elytra more coarsely, contiguously punctate ( Fig. 139 View Figures 137–145 ). Moving further southeastward from Jalisco into Michoacán, Guerrero and Puebla the elytra of S. v. verticalis become coarser but separately punctate ( Fig. 142–144 View Figures 137–145 ), and further into Oaxaca the elytra become coarsely, deeply and contiguously punctate ( Fig. 145 View Figures 137–145 ), more consistently aeneous green in coloration, and the basal half of the scape is more consistently reddish in all specimens examined ( Fig. 154 View Figures 146–154 ).
Stenaspis validicornis Casey, 1912 View in CoL (Type locality: Guerrero, Mexico). Stenaspis validicornis Casey 1912: 319 View in CoL ; Blackwelder 1946: 589 (cat.); Chemsak et al. 1992: 86 (cat.); Monné and Giesbert 1994: 152 (cat.); Monné 1994: 35 (cat.); Noguera and Chemsak 1996: 403 (dist.); Lingafelter et al. 2014: 339, 369 (lect.).
According to Casey (1912: 319), S. validicornis View in CoL is one of the various forms of the verticalis View in CoL group, where the males are defined by differences in color of the integument and punctures on the elytral disc and prosternum. The various forms of the verticalis View in CoL group examined by Casey are based on male characteristics only. Casey (1924: 263), wrote: “ validicornis View in CoL may be regarded as a subspecies or variety of verticalis Serv. View in CoL ” According to Mayr (1969: 41), “subspecies are normally allopatric,” and when several subspecies are reported from the same locality, it strongly indicates an incorrect usage of the term subspecies. Since the type localities of S. v. verticalis View in CoL and S. v. validicornis View in CoL are both from Guerrero, according to Casey (1912: 319) in close proximity to each other, S. v. validicornis View in CoL is considered to be consubspecific with S. v. verticalis View in CoL . This conclusion is based on the polymorphic nature of S. verticalis View in CoL as a species, which exhibits a notable geographic variation in color and sculpturing and the extensive range in distribution from the southwestern United States to southeastern Mexico. Stenaspis v. validicornis View in CoL is in the middle of the geographic range of this species and based on the description provided by Casey (1912) S. v. validicornis View in CoL does not exhibit enough variation in its form and sculpturing to be considered a separate subspecies. A photograph of S. validicornis View in CoL holotype ( Bezark 2020, id: 26567) does not show any notable difference in the overall appearance compared to S. verticalis View in CoL (e.g., S. verticalis View in CoL , syntype, Bezark 2020, id: 18558).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Stenaspis verticalis Audinet-Serville, 1834
Eya, Bryan K. 2021 |
Stenaspis verticalis insignis
Lingafelter SW & Nearns EH & Tavakilian GL & Monne MA & Biondi M. 2014: 80 |
Monne MA & Giesbert EF 1994: 152 |
Chemsak JA & Linsley EG & Noguera FA 1992: 86 |
Hovore FT & Penrose RL & Neck RW 1987: 297 |
Vogt GB 1949: 177 |
Casey TL 1924: 262 |
Stenaspis validicornis
Lingafelter SW & Nearns EH & Tavakilian GL & Monne MA & Biondi M. 2014: 339 |
Noguera FA & Chemsak JA 1996: 403 |
Monne MA & Giesbert EF 1994: 152 |
Chemsak JA & Linsley EG & Noguera FA 1992: 86 |
Blackwelder RE 1946: 589 |
Casey TL 1912: 319 |
Stenaspis verticalis arizonicus
Heffern DJ & Vlasak J & Alten RL 2018: 746 |
Lingafelter SW & Nearns EH & Tavakilian GL & Monne MA & Biondi M. 2014: 20 |
Monne MA & Giesbert EF 1994: 152 |
Chemsak JA & Linsley EG & Noguera FA 1992: 86 |
Casey TL 1912: 318 |
LeConte JL 1858: 40 |
Trachyderes superbus
Newman E. 1838: 493 |
Stenaspis verticalis
Noguera FA & Gutierrez N. 2016: 659 |
Garcia Morales LJ & Garcia Jimenez J & Toledo-Hernandez VH & Cantu-Ayala CM 2014: 106 |
Maes J-M & van den Berghe E & Dauber D & Audureau A & Nearns E & Skillman F & Heffern D & Monne M. 2010: 618 |
Noguera FA & Chemsak JA & Zaragoza-Caballero S & Rodriguez-Palafox A & Ramirez-Garcia E & Gonzalez-Soriano E & Ayala R. 2007: 312 |
Hovore FT 2006: 374 |
Turnbow RHJ & Cave RD & Thomas MC 2003: 18 |
Noguera FA & Zaragoza-Caballero S & Chemsak JA & Rodriguez-Palafox A & Ramirez-Garcia E & Gonzalez-Soriano E & Ayala R. 2002: 624 |
Noguera FA & Chemsak JA 1996: 403 |
Napp DS 1994: 279 |
Monne MA & Giesbert EF 1994: 152 |
Chemsak JA & Noguera FA 1993: 64 |
Terron SR 1992: 288 |
Chemsak JA & Linsley EG & Noguera FA 1992: 86 |
Chemsak JA & Linsley EG & Mankins JV 1980: 33 |
Gibson WW & Carrillo JL 1959: 120 |
Blackwelder RE 1946: 589 |
Smyth EG 1934: 117 |
Perkins RCL & Swezey OH 1924: 51 |
Casey TL 1912: 319 |
Aurivillius C. 1912: 458 |
Fall HC & Cockerell TDA 1907: 192 |
Townsend CHT 1895: 47 |
Leng CW 1886: 62 |
Bates HW 1880: 76 |
Gemminger M & von Harold E. 1872: 2967 |
Lacordaire JT 1869: 171 |
Thomson J. 1864: 208 |
Strauch A. 1861: 127 |
White A. 1853: 78 |
Guerin-Meneville FE 1844: 218 |
Castelnau L & Le Comte 1840: 419 |
Dupont H. 1838: 51 |
Audinet-Serville J-G. 1834: 52 |