Lucilia bufonivora Moniez, 1876
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3881.2.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A87E25A6-B589-4C68-8368-4337862D0D3E |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6137595 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/447387DE-FFBC-FFE1-3DA2-922EF466FC8C |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Lucilia bufonivora Moniez, 1876 |
status |
|
Lucilia bufonivora Moniez, 1876 View in CoL
( Figs 3–4 View FIGURES 1 – 6 , 10 View FIGURES 7 – 11. 7 – 8 , 13 View FIGURES 12 – 15 , 21–25 View FIGURES 21 – 25 , 32 View FIGURES 31 – 39 , 35, 38, 42–43 View FIGURES 40 – 43 , 47 View FIGURES 44 – 48 )
Lucilia bufonivora Moniez, 1876: 25 View in CoL . Syntypes, unspecified number of males and females reared from larvae infesting three live toads (not located). Type locality: Raismes (Nord), France.
Bufolucilia bufonivora: Townsend 1919: 542 View in CoL , as type species of genus Bufolucilia Townsend, 1919 ; Gregor et al. 1971: 106; Baumgartner 1988: 21.
Lucilia bufonivora: Collin 1926: 260 View in CoL ; Lundbeck 1927: 144; Séguy 1928: 151; Aubertin 1933: 419; Brumpt, 1934: 81; Emden 1954: 123; Spence 1954: 29; Zumpt 1956: 44, 1965: 56; Schumann 1971: 8; Mihályi 1977: 182; Rognes 1980: 47, 1981: 119, 1991: 156; Grunin 1988: 1008; Neumann & Meyer 1994: 331; Stevens & Wall 1996: 1087; Draber-Mońko 2004: 439; McDonagh & Stevens 2011: 1760; Martín et al. 2012: 433.
Lucilia (Bufolucilia) bufonivora: Fan 1965: 175 View in CoL ; Schuman 1986: 22; Fan et al. 1997: 200; Verves 2005: 250; Verves & Khrokalo 2010: 27; Draber-Mońko 2013: 142.
Distribution. Holarctic: Europe ( Schuman 1986; Verves 2005; Verves & Khrokalo 2010; Martín et al. 2012 Rognes 1991, 2013); Asia: China (Beijing, Gansu, Heilongjiang, Hubei, Jilin, Liaoning, Neimenggu, Xinjiang, Jiangsu, Hunan) ( Fan et al. 1997), Kazakhstan, Russia (Siberia: Altay, Novosibirsk Region, Krasnoyarskiy Krai) ( Grunin 1988; Verves & Khrokalo 2010), Tibet, Transcaucasia ( Verves & Khrokalo 2010), North Korea (Draber- Mońko 2013); North Africa ( Schuman 1986; Verves & Khrokalo 2010; Rognes 2013); North America (first record in this study): western Canada (Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Alberta, and British Columbia) (see Appendix 1).
Diagnosis. Confirmation of our identification of North American specimens of L. bufonivora is based on the male and female terminalia as described by Rognes (1991).
Both sexes: Distance between the rearmost presutural acrostichal setae distinctly less than (in most specimens examined) ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 7 – 11. 7 – 8 ) or almost equal to the distance between presutural acrostichal and dorsocentral setae in rear row. This state is also shared by L. elongata ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 7 – 11. 7 – 8 ). In L. silvarum , distance between rearmost presutural acrostichal setae equal to (in most specimens examined) ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 7 – 11. 7 – 8 ) or slightly less than distance between rearmost presutural acrostichal and dorsocentral setae in rear row. Two or 3 postsutural acrostichal setae (see discussion under comments on the key). Upper and lower calypters pale as in L. elongata . In L. silvarum , upper calypter pale and lower calypter tan in male and upper and lower calypters pale in female.
Male: Frons 0.094 (0.09–0.10/7) of head width ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 6 ), wider than frons in L. silvarum ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 6 ) and narrower than frons in L. elongata ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 1 – 6 ). For male frons width measurements of the two last species, see the key below. Abdomen of normal length and oval as in L. silvarum . In L. elongata , the abdomen is elongated. T3 and T4 usually with 1–5 discal setae, in addition to T5 (see discussion under comments on the key regarding discal setae). ST5 normal, shorter than T5 ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 12 – 15 ) as in L. silvarum ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 12 – 15 ). In L. elongata , T5 is larger and as long as T5 ( Fig. 14 View FIGURES 12 – 15 ).
Cercus straight, slightly dilated apically in profile and without apical hook ( Fig.21 View FIGURES 21 – 25 ). In L. silvarum , cercus with apical hook ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 16 – 20 ). Surstylus parallel-sided in profile with blunt tip ( Fig. 21 View FIGURES 21 – 25 ). In L. silvarum , surstylus long and slender with apical half evenly tapering in profile ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 16 – 20 ), whereas in L. elongata , surstylus with a straight upper edge and a lower rounded edge, tip slightly upturned in profile ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 26 – 30 ). Aedeagus as described for L. bufonivora species group (see above) ( Figs 23–25 View FIGURES 21 – 25 ). Pre- and postgonites as in Fig. 32 View FIGURES 31 – 39 . Bacilliform sclerites with a characteristic median round projection ( Fig. 35 View FIGURES 31 – 39 ) which is not found in the bacilliform sclerites of L. silvarum ( Fig. 34 View FIGURES 31 – 39 ) or L. elongata ( Fig. 36 View FIGURES 31 – 39 ). Ejaculatory sclerite as in Fig. 38 View FIGURES 31 – 39 .
Female: Frons 0.30 (0.3–0.31/7) of head width (narrower than frons in L. silvarum or L. elongata ; for female frons width measurements of these two species, see the key below) and narrower than eye when seen from above, frontal vitta parallel-sided ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 1 – 6 ). It should be noted that the parallel-sided frontal vitta in L. bufonivora females is a reliable feature to easily separate the females of this species from those of L. silvarum and L. elongata . In the two last species, the frontal vitta is not parallel-sided but widened towards vertex ( Figs 2, 6 View FIGURES 1 – 6 ). T7 divided completely into two broad halves ( Fig. 42 View FIGURES 40 – 43 ) as in L. elongata ( Fig. 44 View FIGURES 44 – 48 ). In L. silvarum , T7 almost completely divided ( Fig. 40 View FIGURES 40 – 43 ). Cercus elongate (narrow) and epiproct microtichose ( Fig. 42 View FIGURES 40 – 43 ). In L. silvarum ( Fig. 40 View FIGURES 40 – 43 ) and L. elongata ( Fig. 44 View FIGURES 44 – 48 ), cercus lobate and epiproct non-microtichose. ST6 and ST7 broad, the latter shaped distally like a broad semi-circle and with numerous setae ( Fig. 43 View FIGURES 40 – 43 ). ST8 small with the distal part shaped as a broad or incomplete semi-circle. However, Rognes (1991) described the shape of distal part of ST8 as almost a circle. In L. silvarum , ST7 narrow apically; ST8 long and rectangular in shape ( Fig. 41 View FIGURES 40 – 43 ). In L. elongata , ST7 distally constricted then dilated with a median extension or process, whereas ST8 with distal part almost a circle ( Fig. 45 View FIGURES 44 – 48 ). Spermathecae as in Fig. 47 View FIGURES 44 – 48 .
Description. See Rognes (1991) for a more detailed description of this species.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Lucilia bufonivora Moniez, 1876
Tantawi, Tarek I. & Whitworth, Terry 2014 |
Lucilia (Bufolucilia) bufonivora:
Draber-Monko 2013: 142 |
Verves 2010: 27 |
Verves 2005: 250 |
Fan 1997: 200 |
Schuman 1986: 22 |
Fan 1965: 175 |
Lucilia bufonivora:
Martin 2012: 433 |
McDonagh 2011: 1760 |
Draber-Monko 2004: 439 |
Stevens 1996: 1087 |
Neumann 1994: 331 |
Grunin 1988: 1008 |
Rognes 1980: 47 |
Mihalyi 1977: 182 |
Schumann 1971: 8 |
Zumpt 1956: 44 |
Emden 1954: 123 |
Spence 1954: 29 |
Brumpt 1934: 81 |
Aubertin 1933: 419 |
Seguy 1928: 151 |
Lundbeck 1927: 144 |
Collin 1926: 260 |
Bufolucilia bufonivora:
Baumgartner 1988: 21 |
Gregor 1971: 106 |
Townsend 1919: 542 |
Lucilia bufonivora
Moniez 1876: 25 |