Dicranopalpus cantabricus Dresco, 1953
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2022.839.1931 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5C68FC94-E0B5-4E42-8153-A1ED21304F9F |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7116872 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/450287D1-E723-FF9C-D0C9-C72CBF09FBEB |
treatment provided by |
Diego |
scientific name |
Dicranopalpus cantabricus Dresco, 1953 |
status |
|
Dicranopalpus cantabricus Dresco, 1953 View in CoL (revalidation)
Figs 4B View Fig , 5B View Fig , 6B, G View Fig , 9D View Fig , 11–13 View Fig View Fig View Fig
Dicranopalpus cantabricus Dresco, 1953: 147–149 View in CoL . Type locality: ‘‘Au-dessus du refuge des Puertos de Aliva, (…) au dela du Col Horcadina de Covarrobres (alt. 1900 m.) (43.16° N, 4.81° W) (province de Santander, presently Cantabria).’’
D. martini View in CoL – Roewer 1953: 206. — Luque 1992: 150.
Dicranopalpus sp. – Merino & Anadón 2008: 203.
Diagnosis
Medium-sized, male dark brown coloured, leg femora in both sexes with trichomes.
Material examined
SPAIN • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Asturias, Río Cares, Camarmeña ; 43.157° N, 4.503° W; 320 m a.s.l.; 24 Apr. 2006; L. Crespo leg.; both specimens are partly bleached; ZUPV 4542 GoogleMaps .
Description
Male
LENGTH. 3.4, width of prosoma 2.5, BLI 1.8.
DORSUM ( Fig. 4B View Fig ). Ground colour pale yellowish. Prosoma with dark brown spots and patches laterally and posteriorly of eye tubercle. Anterior and lateral margins of prosoma pale yellowish. Ozopores small, round. Dark brown saddle narrowing on opisthosomal tergites III–IV, widening on following tergites. Opisthosomal tergites with paramedian pairs of white spots and transverse rows of small dark spots.
EYE TUBERCLE. Greyish brown with silvery sheen, shallow, canaliculated (with longitudinal groove), slightly wider than long, and slightly tilted backwards, at about its length from anterior margin of carapace, dorsally with few minute black setae. Eyes surrounded by narrow black ring.
VENTER AND COXAE. Uniformly pale yellowish with scattered black setae.
CHELICERAE. Uniformly pale yellowish, segment I with distinct ventral spur; segment I dorsally, and segment II dorsally and medially near cheliceral claw with stout black setae ( Fig. 5B View Fig ).
PEDIPALPS ( Fig. 11A–C View Fig ). (Colouration of specimen faded, colour pattern probably as in D. gallaecicus sp. nov.) Compared to D. gallaecicus sp. nov., segments longer and more slender; femoral apophysis pale, more than half as long as femur width at its base, femur on ventral side with sensilla chaetica that are slightly longer than other setae on femur; patella slender, apophysis about as long as patella, slightly widening in distal half, in lateral view curved upwards ( Figs 6G View Fig , 11A, C View Fig ). Mediodistal apophysis of tibia a small knob ( Fig. 6B View Fig ). Tarsus straight, slightly bent ventrally in distal third section; claw pectinate ( Fig. 11B View Fig ).
LEGS. Leg lengths I–IV (in parentheses femur lengths): 25 (4.6); 46 (8.3); 28 (5.0); 37 (6.7). Colouration faded, colour pattern probably as in D. gallaecicus sp. nov. Leg segments cylindrical in cross section, dorsal and dorsolateral sides of femora with sensilla chaetica and a few small black spines. Femur I on dorsodistal half with trichomes, legs II to IV with trichomes, absent only on ventral side proximally. Patellae and tibiae densely covered with trichomes. Tibia II with 5 pseudo-articulations; metatarsi I–IV have 4, 9, 4 and 6 pseudo-articulations, respectively. Numerous bipterate setae on prolateral sides of metatarsus III and IV and in decreasing numbers on proximal tarsomeres 1–10 of leg III and 1–19 of leg IV.
PENIS ( Fig. 12 View Fig ). Long and slender; length 1.94; truncus widest in basal ⅓, tapering to glans ( Fig. 12A View Fig ). Intrinsic penial muscle in about basal 2 /5. Glans longer than wide, ventral margin continuing in a smooth line to horns ( Fig. 12G View Fig ); glans dorsally and ventrally sclerotized and provided with canaliculi; dorsal cavity large and ovoid ( Figs 12C–D, F–G View Fig ). Dorsal truncus–glans transition in a wide angle. A pair of sensory setae ( Fig. 12E View Fig ). Stylus about as long as glans, slightly curved ventrally; two slender horns positioned on stylus.
Female
LENGTH. 4.1, width of prosoma 2.4, BLI 1.9.
DORSUM. Colours of specimen faded.
PEDIPALPS ( Fig. 11D–E View Fig ). Femoral apophysis robust, nearly as long as femur width at base; patellar apophysis large, reaching to base of tibial apophysis, as thick as tibia. Mediodistal apophysis of tibia stout, as long as wide ( Fig. 11E View Fig ). Femur ventrally with large plumose setae, tibia ventrally with a row of 14 robust plumose setae.
LEGS. As in male. Leg lengths I–IV (in parentheses femur lengths): 23 (4.6); 40 (8.8); 25 (5.1); 38 (7.1). Trichomes on femora as in male. Tibia II with 3 pseudo-articulations; metatarsi I–IV with 4, 7, 3 and 6 pseudo-articulations, respectively.
SEMINAL RECEPTACLES. Located in ovipositor segments 6–7; two long tubes, each with a small lateral pocket at base ( Fig. 9D View Fig ).
Distribution and ecology
The locality of the redescribed specimens (Camarmeña, Asturias) is about 10 km from the type locality of D. cantabricus (Puertos de Áliva, Cantabria), in the Picos de Europa National Park ( Fig. 13 View Fig ). Roewer (1953) erroneously located his D. martini records of Monte de los Sagredales (municipality of Caso, Asturias) in the Sierra de Guadarrama. Records given by Merino & Anadón (2008) from the Reserva Natural Integral de Muniellos (municipality of Cangas de Narcea) are in the mountainous Asturias, and these are likely D. cantabricus . We tentatively ascribe the record of Luque (1992) from a coastal Cantabrian site (Ría de Tina Menor , municipality of Val de San Vicente) to this taxon. In summary, D. cantabricus is a Spanish endemite, probably restricted to the Cantabrian Mountains. Phenology unknown.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Dicranopalpus cantabricus Dresco, 1953
Wijnhoven, Hay, Martens, Jochen & Prieto, Carlos E. 2022 |
Dicranopalpus sp.
Merino Sainz I. & Anadon A. 2008: 203 |
Dicranopalpus cantabricus
Dresco E. 1953: 149 |
D. martini
Luque C. 1992: 150 |
Roewer C. - F. 1953: 206 |