Camaegeria aristura ( Meyrick, 1931 ) Meyrick, 1931
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.212257 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6173492 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/457187D0-FFFA-8613-82D6-2D82FB90FDD9 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Camaegeria aristura ( Meyrick, 1931 ) |
status |
comb. nov. |
Camaegeria aristura ( Meyrick, 1931) View in CoL n. comb.
Figs. 1–4 View FIGURES 1 – 12
Tipulomima [sic!] aristura Meyrick, 1931: 49 View in CoL . Holotype 3 ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 12 ): Uganda, Kampala, 4.Jul.1930, H. Hargreaves leg. (BMNH).
Aegeria leptomorpha Meyrick, 1931: 50 View in CoL n. syn. Holotype 3 ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1 – 12 ): Uganda, Kampala, 27.Mar.1930, H. Hargreaves leg. (BMNH).
Aegeria hadassa Meyrick, 1932: 336 View in CoL n. syn. 2 Syntypes: 1 Ƥ ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 12 ): 27.Apr.1932, 1 3 ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 1 – 12 ), 20.Apr.1932, Uganda, Kampala, leg. (BMNH).
Heppner & Duckworth 1981: 31 ( Synanthedon View in CoL ), 41 ( Tipulamima View in CoL ), Pühringer & Kallies 2004: 28 ( Synanthedon View in CoL ), 33 ( Tipulamima View in CoL ).
Diagnosis. Camaegeria aristura is one of four very similar species in this genus from the African mainland, together with C. auripicta , C. monogama and C. sophax ). This group of species is black, with the thorax laterally and dorsally, as well as tergites 1–2 and the tip of the abdomen having orange-red scales. Camaegeria aristura differs from C. monogama by the lack of an abdominal cingulum (present on tergite 4 in C. monogama ), from C. sophax by the completely black rather than partly red forewings, metathorax and tergites 1–3, and further from both species by a diffuse orange-red, dorso-medial stripe on the mesothorax. In C. auripicta this stripe is much more distinct and longer, extending to prothorax and tergite 1. The genitalia structures of C. aristura are unknown.
Remarks. The types of the two taxa synonymised herein were collected by H. Hargreaves in Uganda, Kampala within two years ( Meyrick 1931, 1932). These specimens are extremely similar and they are considered conspecific. In his original description Meyrick (1932) confused the sex of the two syntypes of Aegeria hadassa : the specimen from 27.Apr.1932 is a female, and the one from 20.Apr.1932 a male.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Camaegeria aristura ( Meyrick, 1931 )
Bartsch, Daniel & Berg, Jutta 2012 |
Aegeria hadassa
Meyrick 1932: 336 |
Tipulomima [sic!] aristura
Meyrick 1931: 49 |
Aegeria leptomorpha
Meyrick 1931: 50 |