Camaegeria monogama ( Meyrick, 1932 ) Meyrick, 1932
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.212257 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6173496 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/457187D0-FFFD-8615-82D6-2BC6FB5FFD26 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Camaegeria monogama ( Meyrick, 1932 ) |
status |
comb. nov. |
Camaegeria monogama ( Meyrick, 1932) View in CoL n. comb.
Figs. 8–9 View FIGURES 1 – 12
Aegeria monogama Meyrick, 1932: 337 View in CoL : Holotype Ƥ ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 1 – 12 ): Sierra Leone, Njala, November E. Hargreaves leg. (BMNH). Macrotarsipus lioscelis Meyrick, 1935 n View in CoL . syn. Holotype Ƥ ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 1 – 12 ): Sierra Leone, Njala, 7.May.1934. E. Hargreaves leg. (BMNH).
Heppner & Duckworth 1981: 32 ( Synanthedon View in CoL ), 43 ( Macrotarsipus View in CoL ); Pühringer & Kallies 2004: 28 ( Synanthedon View in CoL ), 34 ( Macrotarsipus View in CoL ).
Diagnosis. See Camaegeria aristura .
Remarks. The type specimens of Aegeria monogama and Macrotarsipus lioscelis cannot be distinguished based on external characters and have been collected by the same collector from the same collecting locality, Njala, Sierra Leone. It still seems possible that Camaegeria monogama represents a junior synonym of C. exochiformis , which is also native to Sierra Leone. This decision is left open due to the deplorable condition of the only known specimen of C. exochiformis . The genitalia structures of C. monogama have not been dissected.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Camaegeria monogama ( Meyrick, 1932 )
Bartsch, Daniel & Berg, Jutta 2012 |
Aegeria monogama
Meyrick 1932: 337 |