Alysia macrops Wharton, 1986

Zhu, Jia-Chen, Achterberg, Cornelis Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2018, Review of the genus Alysia Latreille (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Alysiinae), with description of six new species from China, Zootaxa 4500 (1), pp. 1-42 : 30-32

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4500.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:54BE1878-D334-4668-BDAA-45EC75EB841A

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5300159

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/4620AD1A-FFB0-FFF9-49A9-FEA66EA19B19

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Alysia macrops Wharton, 1986
status

 

Alysia macrops Wharton, 1986 View in CoL

Figs 21–22

Alysia marcrops Wharton, 1986: 487 ; Chen & Wu, 1994: 33; Belokobylskij, 1998: 178.

Material. 1♀ ( ZJUH), “ [SE. China:] Zhejiang, Linan , Qingliangfeng, 10.?.2005, Shi Min, No. 200607346” ; 2 ♀ ( ZJUH), id., but No. 200607367, 200607651 ; 3 ♀ ( ZJUH), id., but 12.?.2005, No. 200607651, 200607671, 200607650 ; 3 ♀ ( ZJUH), id., but 12.?.2005, Zhang Hongying, No. 200607760, 200607719, 200607754 ; 1♀ ( ZJUH), Zhejiang, Anji, Mt. Longwang , 31.?.1993, Chen Xuexin, No. 939733 ; 1♂ ( ZJUH), Zhejiang, Linan, Qingliangfeng , 10.?.2005, Shi Min, No. 200607377 ; 1♂ ( ZJUH), id., but 12.?.2005, Zhang Hongying, No. 200607758 ; 1♂ ( ZJUH), id., but Zhang Hongying, No. 200607454 ; 1♀ ( ZJUH), Hebei, Mt. Xiaowutai, Shanxunkou , 22.?.2005, Zhang Hongying, No. 200608685 ; 5 ♀ ( ZJUH), Guangdong, Fuyuan Nanling , 4.?.2004, Xu Zaifu, No. 20049712, 20049759, 20049602, 20049871 ; 1♀ ( ZJUH), Yunnan, Mt. Pingbiandawei , 18.?.2003, Xu Zaifu, No. 20055167 .

Diagnosis. Body black ( Fig. 21); eye in dorsal view 2.8 × as long as temple ( Fig. 22H View FIGURE 22 ); eye in lateral view as high as wide ( Fig. 22J View FIGURE 22 ); frons smooth posteriorly, but with some rugae near antennal sockets and densely granulate ( Fig. 22H View FIGURE 22 ); vertex and temple smooth ( Fig. 22H View FIGURE 22 ); face 1.5 × wider than high, rather convex medially, densely granulate and with a medio-longitudinal ridge ( Fig. 22I View FIGURE 22 ); clypeus small and semi-elliptical ( Fig. 22I View FIGURE 22 ); precoxal sulcus widely crenulate, not reaching middle coxa and anterior edge of epicnemial area ( Fig. 22B View FIGURE 22 ); notauli sparsely crenulated and incomplete, impressed on disc ( Fig. 22C View FIGURE 22 ); medio-posterior depression deep and crenulated, not extending to middle of mesoscutum ( Fig. 22C View FIGURE 22 ); surface of propodeum densely reticulate-rugose, areola absent posteriorly ( Fig. 22D View FIGURE 22 ); pterostigma 4.0 × longer than its maximum width ( Fig. 22A View FIGURE 22 ); hind coxa smooth ( Fig. 22M View FIGURE 22 ); length of first tergite 2.4 × its apical width, its surface longitudinally striate, its dorsal carinae connected posteriorly ( Fig. 22D View FIGURE 22 ); setose part of ovipositor sheath 0.4 × as long as fore wing (total visible sheath 0.4 times), and 1.3 × as long as hind tibia ( Fig. 22G View FIGURE 22 ); antenna black (but scapus and annellus yellowish); mandible, pronope, metasoma (except first tergite black and posterior part of second to six tergite brownish) and legs (except hind tarsus, hind tibia and apical part of hind femur dark reddish brown) yellowish ( Fig. 21).

Description. ♀, Length of body 4.4 mm, of fore wing 4.5 mm.

Head. Transverse, width of head twice its lateral length, and 1.5 × wider than mesoscutum ( Fig. 22H View FIGURE 22 ); antenna with 39 antennomere, third antennomere (including annellus) 1.5 × longer than fourth antennomere, length of third, fourth and penultimate antennomere5.0, 3.5 and 2.5 × their width, respectively ( Fig. 22F View FIGURE 22 ); maxillary palp incomplete ( Fig. 21); eye in dorsal view 2.8 × as long as temple ( Fig. 22H View FIGURE 22 ); eye in lateral view as high as wide ( Fig. 22J View FIGURE 22 ); frons smooth posteriorly, but with some rugae near antennal sockets and densely granulate ( Fig. 22H View FIGURE 22 ); vertex and temple smooth; OOL:diameter of ocellus:POL= 11:5:4; face 1.5 × wider than high, rather convex medially, densely granulate and with a medio-longitudinal ridge ( Fig. 22I View FIGURE 22 ); clypeus small and semi-elliptical ( Fig. 22I View FIGURE 22 ); mandible enlarged apically, dorsal tooth enlarged, lobe-shaped ( Fig. 22K View FIGURE 22 ), ventral tooth medium-sized and lobeshaped ( Fig. 22L View FIGURE 22 ), ventral carina protruding, middle tooth curved and acute, with no incision between first and second tooth ( Fig. 22K View FIGURE 22 ), medial length of mandible 1.6 × its maximum width.

Mesosoma. Length of mesosoma 1.4 × its height ( Fig. 22B View FIGURE 22 ); pronope absent; medio-anteriorly pronotum crenulate, remainder of pronotum smooth; epicnemial area crenulate; precoxal sulcus widely crenulate, not reaching middle coxa and anterior edge of epicnemial area ( Fig. 22B View FIGURE 22 ); pleural sulcus crenulated ventrally ( Fig. 22B View FIGURE 22 ); episternal scrobe round and deep; metapleuron densely reticulate-rugose ( Fig. 22B View FIGURE 22 ); mesonotum with few setae along notaulic courses and anterior part of middle lobe of mesoscutum ( Fig. 22C View FIGURE 22 ); notauli sparsely crenulated and incomplete, present on disc anteriorly ( Fig. 22C View FIGURE 22 ); medio-posterior depression deep and crenulated, not extending to middle of mesoscutum, scutellar sulcus deep, with one longitudinal carina and three small carinae, sulcus 2.5 × wider than its maximum length ( Fig. 22C View FIGURE 22 ); scutellum smooth; surface of propodeum densely reticulate-rugose, areola absent posteriorly ( Fig. 22D View FIGURE 22 ).

Wings ( Fig. 22A View FIGURE 22 ). Pterostigma 4.0 × longer than its maximum width. r:3-SR:SR1 = 1:33:86; 1-SR+M nearly straight; SR1 straight; r 0.6 × as long as width of pterostigma; cu-a weakly postfurcal; 1-CU1:2-CU1 = 1: 15; 3- CU1 as long as CU1b; 2-SR:3-SR:r-m = 6:5:3; m-cu interstitial, converging to 1-M posteriorly; first subdiscal cell 5.0 × as long as wide; M+CU1 largely unsclerotized. Hind wing: M+CU: 1-M: 1r-m = 20:15:11; m-cu weakly antefurcal.

Legs. Hind coxa smooth, without ventro-basal tubercle; tarsal claws slender, longer than arolium ( Fig. 22M View FIGURE 22 ); length of femur, tibia and basitarsus of hind leg 5.0, 8.8 and 6.3 × their width, respectively; apical appendages of hind tarsal segments absent, segments ventrally with dense bristles ( Fig. 22M View FIGURE 22 ).

Metasoma. Length of first tergite 2.4 × its apical width, its surface longitudinally striate, its dorsal carinae connected posteriorly ( Fig. 22D View FIGURE 22 ); dorsope distinct; convexity of upper valve of ovipositor low basally ( Fig. 22G View FIGURE 22 ); setose part of ovipositor sheath 0.4 × as long as fore wing (total visible sheath 0.4 times), and 1.3 × as long as hind tibia ( Fig. 22G View FIGURE 22 ).

Colour. Black ( Fig. 21); antenna black (but scapus and annellus yellowish); mandible, pronope, metasoma (except first tergite black and posterior part of second–sixth tergites brownish) and legs (except hind tarsus, hind tibia and apical part of hind femur dark reddish brown) yellowish; clypeus, pterostigma and veins brown; wing membrane hyaline.

Variation. Males are similar to females, body length of ♂ 3.2–3.5 mm; of fore wing 3.3–3.6 mm; antennal segments of ♂ 34 (1). Females have body length 3.4–4.4 mm, and length of fore wing 3.3–4.5 mm, eye in dorsal view 2.3–2.7 × as long as temple; face 1.5–1.7 × wider than high, antennal segments of ♀ 33(1), 34(1), 35(1), 36(1), 37(2), 38 (1) or 39(1).

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hymenoptera

Family

Braconidae

Genus

Alysia

Loc

Alysia macrops Wharton, 1986

Zhu, Jia-Chen, Achterberg, Cornelis Van & Chen, Xue-Xin 2018
2018
Loc

Alysia marcrops

Belokobylskij, S. A. 1998: 178
Chen, J. - H. & Wu, Z. - S. 1994: 33
Wharton, R. A. 1986: 487
1986
Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF