Lourus, Ueckermann & Grout, 2007
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00222930701589921 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/464587D1-8B5B-FFC9-FE63-FC40FC9BF961 |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Lourus |
status |
gen. nov. |
Genus Lourus gen. nov.
Type species. Lourus testatus ( Kuznetzov, 1972) .
Diagnosis
Adults. This new genus is closely related to Neopronematus Panou et al. but differs from the latter in that setae h 2 and ps 2 are present. The leg chaetotaxy of both genera is the same.
Panou et al. (2000) based Neopronematus on two of Kuznetzov’s (1972) species, namely Pronematus rapidus and P. neglectus , with the former as type species, and a new species they described from Greece. They ignored P. testatus Kuznetzov which, along with L. citricolus sp. n., differs from Neopronematus in bearing dorsal seta h 2 and anal seta ps 2.
This new genus can be defined as follows: propodosoma with four pairs of setae, including trichobothria (sci), opisthosoma with 10 pairs of setae (including ps 1–2), posterior margin with a lobe; this lobe is also present in the type species L. testatus (Dr A. Khaustov, personal communication); poroidotaxy: 4; genital organotaxy: 0-0-4; solenidiotaxy: 3; epimeral formula 3-1-4-1 or 2, palp chaetotaxy 5-1-1 or 2; chaetotaxy of trochantera 1-1-1-0. Differences in setation of coxae IV and the palp femur are regarded as significant at species level .
Etymology
The genus name is derived from the Latin word lobus meaning lobe and the Greek word oura meaning tail and refers to the posterior lobe of the opisthosoma of L. citricolus ; L. testatus also have a small lobe. The gender is masculine.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.