Liroetis nigriceps ( Laboissière, 1929 ) Bezděk, 2021
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.37520/aemnp.2021.030 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:06FDFB43-0B61-4DA8-B260-D78ABD62756C |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/492287F9-DB4A-FFA2-FF6D-ACF2FB03FDE7 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Liroetis nigriceps ( Laboissière, 1929 ) |
status |
comb. nov. |
Liroetis nigriceps ( Laboissière, 1929) comb. nov.
( Figs 193 View Figs 193–196 , 205 View Figs 197–208. 197 , 216 View Figs 209–219 , 239–244 View Figs 239–244 )
Pseudoliroetis nigriceps Laboissière, 1929: 282 (original description).
Pseudoliroetis nigriceps : Gඋൾඌඌංඍඍ & Kංආඈඍඈ (1963):530 (key); Wංඅർඈඑ (1973): 478 (catalogue).
Pseudoliroëtis nigriceps: OǤ අඈൻඅංඇ (1936): 206 (description).
Siemssenius nigriceps: ZIJ ൺඇǤ et al. (2008b): 127 (key); Bൾൾඇൾඇ (2010): 488 (catalogue); YൺඇǤ et al. (2015): 251 (key), 252 (noted).
Type locality. ‘Thibet: Moupin [= China, Sichuan Province, Baoxing]’. Type material examined. Sඒඇඍඒඉൾ: 1 J ( Figs 239–242 View Figs 239–244 ), ‘MUS. HIST. NAT. / A. DAVID / Moupin (Thibet) / 1871 [w, p] // TYPE [p, red letters] / J [w, h] // Pseudoliroetis / nigriceps / m [h] / V. Laboissière – Dét. [w, p] // Le Moult vend. / via Reinbek / Eing. Nr. 1, 1957 [w, p]’ ( ZMUH); 1 ♀, ‘MUS. HIST. NAT. / A. DAVID / Moupin (Thibet) / 1871 [w, p] // TYPE [red letters, w, p] // Pseudoliroetis / nigriceps / m [h] / V. Laboissière – Dét. [w, p]’ ( MNHN); 1 ♀, ‘MUS. HIST. NAT. / A. DAVID / Moupin (Thibet) / 1871 [w, p] // Pseudoliroetis / nigriceps / m [h] / V. Laboissière – Dét. [w, p]’ ( MNHN).
Additional material examined. CHINA: GඎංඓΗඈඎ: ‘Kiautschau’, 1 J ( NHMB – Frey coll.); Leishan Co., SE Kli, NE Leishan, Leigong Shan, E slope, env. of pass between Leishan and Fangxiang, 26°22.74′N 108°12.99′E, 1700–1800 m, 14.–24.vi.2001, 1 J 2♀♀, H. Schillhammer leg. ( NHMW). SංർΗඎൺඇ: Bifeng env., 30°04.112′N 102°59.427′E, 1140 m, 17.–24.v.2017, 2 JJ, W. Grosser leg. ( JBCB).
Diagnosis. Colouration. Head black with brownish vertex, pronotum, scutellum, elytra and abdomen pale brown, meso- and metaventrite, antennae and legs black. The specimens from Guizhou have pale brown head and underside.
Body length. JJ: 9.5–10.9 mm, ♀♀: 10.1–11.1 mm.
Male ( Figs 243–244 View Figs 239–244 ). Antennae 0.79 times as long as body. Pronotum convex, 1.72 times as wide as long, almost impunctate, anterior margin nearly straight, unbordered, posterior margin rounded, thinly bordered, lateral margins with wider border. Posterior margin of abdominal ventrite IV with two obliquely impressed transverse triangular processes separated by U-shaped incision. Longitudinal impression on last abdominal ventrite very wide and deep, narrowed basally. Pygidium with triangularly pointed apex. Protarsomere I parallel. Metatibial spur wide, flat, with oblique apex.
Aedeagus ( Fig. 193 View Figs 193–196 ). Median lobe of aedeagus 3.76 times as long as wide; apical eighth narrow, parallel, rest wide, slightly narrowed in apical 2/8, basal 3/4 slightly convergent anteriorly. Lateral view: median lobe bisinuate; lateral elevation high, triangular, placed in anterior fifth of aedeagus length. Dorsal process 5.21 times as long as wide, 0.84 times as long as median lobe; apical two thirds elongate oval, apex sharp, basal third narrower, parallel. Lateral view: ventral side of dorsal process regularly widely rounded, dorsal side with distinct hump behind middle.
Female. Metatibial spur present, thin and sharp. Sternite VIII subsemicircular, posterior margin with small wide triangular incision followed by short keel, surface laterally with two elevated plates, long setae accumulated along posterior and inner margins of those plates, one isolated seta placed in middle of lateral part, middle part of surface with W-shaped impression; tignum 0.40 times as long as sternite VIII, narrow, asymmetrical, directed slightly to left ( Fig. 216 View Figs 209–219 ). Spermatheca with slightly indicated nodulus covered with fine wrinkles, cornu C-shaped, gradually narrowed towards sharp apex, spermathecal duct relatively long, straight basally and bent apically ( Fig. 205 View Figs 197–208. 197 ).
Differential diagnosis. Liroetis nigriceps differs from similar L. fulvipennis in black or dark head and presence of metatibial spur in females (head brown and metatibial spur absent in females in L. fulvipennis ). Dorsal process of aedeagus is wider and subparallel in anterior two thirds in L. nigriceps but widest in middle in L. fulvipennis ( Figs 187 View Figs 185–188 , 193 View Figs 193–196 ). Another similar species, L. jeanvoinei , has dorsum reddish brown and median lobe of aedeagus almost parallel, with dorsal process very narrow and parallel ( Fig. 188 View Figs 185–188 ).
Distribution. China: Sichuan (Lൺൻඈංඌඌංජඋൾ 1929, present paper), Guizhou (present paper).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Liroetis nigriceps ( Laboissière, 1929 )
Bezděk, Jan 2021 |
Pseudoliroetis nigriceps Laboissière, 1929: 282
LABOISSIERE V. 1929: 282 |