Columba sp.
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.3853/j.0067-1975.62.2010.1538 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/4C1D87C7-962D-DA59-FF04-F981FBACFD6C |
treatment provided by |
Marcus |
scientific name |
Columba sp. |
status |
|
Columba sp. cf. C. pisana ( Portis, 1889)
Fig. 5H View Figure 5
Material. Right humerus, distal part and shaft, AaO-2672.
Measurements (in mm): distal width, 10.6; distal depth, 7.3; width of shaft in the middle, 5.2.
Given the current environment of Ahl al Oughlam the presence of members of Pteroclidae could be expected, but the humerus AaO-2672 agrees well with the columbids and differs from the pteroclids because in the pteroclids the entepicondyle projects caudad much more than in the columbids, and it is clearly distinct from the ventral condyle.
The species described by Portis (1889) from Orciano Pisano, in Tuscany, as Falco pisanus , actually corresponds to a columbid (Mourer-Chauviré, in Olson, 1985c). Mlíkovský (2002) placed this species in the genus Columba and he placed it in synonymy with Columba omnisanctorum described by Ballmann (1976) from the Gargano. These two species are almost contemporaneous, early Pliocene ( MN 14–15) for the Gargano, middle Pliocene ( MN 15–16) for Orciano Pisano ( Delle Cave 1996). It is not possible to compare these two species directly because they are not represent- ed by the same elements, but they are compatible in size. The ulna of Columba pisana is slightly larger than that of Recent Columba livia and Columba oenas , and the different elements of Columba omnisanctorum are included in the range of variation of the Recent C. oenas (see measurements in Fick, 1974). Columba palumbus is bigger than both species ( Fick, 1974). In the Ahl al Oughlam humerus the distal width is 10.6 mm whereas in C. omnisanctorum the distal width is 11 mm ( Ballmann, 1976).
MN |
Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |