Sparianthis megalopalpa ( Caporiacco, 1954 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5496.3.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0EE7F5B4-79D2-4B6A-95FD-C5697292F960 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13346857 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/4D7187A3-FF83-C978-FF0A-FDCA3DCFFEC4 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Sparianthis megalopalpa ( Caporiacco, 1954 ) |
status |
|
Sparianthis megalopalpa ( Caporiacco, 1954) View in CoL
Figs 15A–B View FIGURES 15 , 16A–C View FIGURES 16 , 20 View FIGURE 20
Pseudosparianthis megalopalpus Caporiacco, 1954: 127 figs 34, 34a (Holotype ♂, French Guyana, Lower Oyapock River , 1900, Geay leg., MNHN, not located, not examined).
Sparianthis megalopalpa (Caporiacco) View in CoL : Rheims 2020: 181 View Cited Treatment : figs 109–116, 143 (transfer from Pseudosparianthis ).
Additional material examined. COLOMBIA: Amazonas : 1♂, Parque Natural Nacional Amacayu, San Martín (03°46’S, 70°18’W), 150 m, 13–17 December 2001, Malaise, D. Chota leg. (ICN-Ar-13560) GoogleMaps . FRENCH GUYANA: 1♀, Petit montagen Tortue, Est. (04º19’14.1”N, 52º14’27.5”W), November 2010, V. Vedel leg. ( IBSP 276683 ) GoogleMaps .
Diagnosis. Females of S. megalopalpa resemble those of S. boraris ( Rheims 2020: figs 24–25, 29–31) and S. ravida ( Rheims 2020: figs 135–136, 140–142) in having the epigyne with anterior and lateral furrows continuous, curving around copulatory openings and similar IDS with first winding antero-laterad and GP arising from it. They are distinguished from both species by the AA wider than long and IDS reaching the anterior margins of AA ( Figs 15A–B View FIGURES 15 , 16A–B View FIGURES 16 ) (AA roughly as wide as long or slightly longer than wide and IDS reaching half the length of AA in the other species). For males, see Rheims (2020: 181).
Description. Male: See Rheims 2020: 181, figs 109–116.
Female (IBSP 276683): very badly preserved specimen. Prosoma: 4.1 long, 3.1 wide. Eyes: diameters: 0.29, 0.20, 0.15, 0.19; interdistances: 0.30, 0.10, 0.55, 0.30, 0.21, 0.11. Legs: I: - (3.7, 2.1, 3.4, rest of leg absent); II: 13.2 (3.7, 2.1, 3.5, 3.0, 0.9); III: 10.1 (3.4, 1.6, 2.1, 2.3, 0.7); IV: 12.7 (3.7, 1.6, 2.8, 3.5, 1.1). Spination follows the generic pattern. Epigyne: EF sub squared, slightly longer than wide; AA bean-shaped, wider than long; MS roughly as wide as long, widest posteriorly with posterior margin gently curved ( Figs 15A View FIGURES 15 , 16A View FIGURES 16 ). Vulva: IDS with copulatory ducts slender (half the width of the rest of the duct) until turn of first winding; GP large, roughly as long as wide; spermathecae ovoid, longer than wide; FD antero-laterad ( Figs 15B View FIGURES 15 , 16B–C View FIGURES 16 ).
Distribution. Known from French Guyana and Colombia ( Fig. 20 View FIGURE 20 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Sparianthis megalopalpa ( Caporiacco, 1954 )
Casas, Cristian M. & Rheims, Cristina A. 2024 |
Pseudosparianthis megalopalpus
Caporiacco, L. di 1954: 127 |