Chrysoctonus, Mathot, 1966
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5036.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9047AF72-0A9C-4636-B3A9-1018DA9F686A |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5503087 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/514B87B5-0127-3700-76E5-FF60EEAA069A |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Chrysoctonus |
status |
|
CHRYSOCTONUS Mathot, 1966 View in CoL View at ENA
( Figs 85, 86 View FIGURES 85, 86 )
Chrysoctonus Mathot, 1966: 224 View in CoL . Type species: Chrysoctonus apterus Mathot, 1966 View in CoL , by monotypy. See Huber et al. (2020) for generic synonyms and their type species.
Diagnosis. Ocelli absent; female antenna with funicle 7-segmented ( Fig. 86 View FIGURES 85, 86 ); mesosoma short, higher than wide, with pronotum, mesoscutum and scutellum all about equal in length ( Fig. 85 View FIGURES 85, 86 ); wingless ( Fig. 85 View FIGURES 85, 86 ). Male with flagellum 11-segmented, each funicle segment several times as long as wide and fully winged, with venation extending almost 0.6× fore wing length.
Discussion. Chrysoctonus belongs to the Borneomymar group of genera. In the Afrotropical region this group also includes Borneomymar . All Chrysoctonus males have the wing venation at least 0.6 × the wing length (females are wingless). Females of the three genera are distinguished by the number of funicle segments — 5 in Arescon , 8 in Borneomymar and 7 in Chrysoctonus . Extralimital species of Chrysoctonus have as few as 4 funicle segments but so far the single Afrotropical species is only known to have 7.
Afrotropical hosts. Unknown.
Important reference. Huber & Triapitsyn (2015).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Chrysoctonus
Huber, John T., Read, Jennifer D. & Triapitsyn, Serguei V. 2021 |
Chrysoctonus
Mathot, G. 1966: 224 |