Endonura zelkovae, Smolis & Skarżyński & Gwiazdowicz, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5278.2.6 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E84EA49C-11B0-4022-8C66-87A54CEA71A9 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7906311 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/5211B409-2811-FFF6-FF30-54A2FC3FFB6D |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Endonura zelkovae |
status |
sp. nov. |
Endonura zelkovae sp. nov.
Figs 30–36 View FIGURES 30–36 , Tab. 2 View TABLE 2
Type material. Holotype: female, bark of Zelkova abelicea trees, slope of Mt. Kedros near Gerakari village (35.194829 N, 24.606713 E), 1255 m a. s. l., Crete, Greece, 11.X.2018, leg. D.J. Gwiazdowicz. GoogleMaps
Description. General. Habitus typical of genus. Dorsal tubercles present and well developed, except groups Di on Th. I. Body length of holotype (without antennae): 1 mm. Colour of the body white. 2 + 2 large black eyes, in a typical arrangement for the genus ( Fig. 30 View FIGURES 30–36 ).
Chaetal morphology. Dorsal ordinary chaetae of five types: long macrochaetae (Ml), short macrochaetae (Mc), very short macrochaetae (Mcc), mesochaetae and microchaetae. Long macrochaetae relatively thick, slightly arc-like or straight, narrowly sheathed, feebly serrated, apically rounded or pointed ( Figs 30, 36 View FIGURES 30–36 ). Macrochaetae Mc and Mcc morphologically similar to long macrochaetae, but shorter. Mesochaetae similar to ventral chaetae, thin, smooth and pointed. Microchaetae similar to mesochaetae, but apparently short. S–chaetae of tergites thin, smooth and short, notably shorter than nearby macrochaetae ( Fig. 30 View FIGURES 30–36 ).
Antennae. Typical of the genus. Dorsal chaetotaxy of Ant. III–IV as Tab. 2b View TABLE 2 . S-chaetae of Ant. IV of medium length and relatively thin, sensillum sgd short and straight. Apical vesicle trilobate. Ventral chaetotaxy of Ant. III and Ant. IV as Tab. 2b View TABLE 2 .
Mouthparts. Buccal cone relatively long and narrow, labral sclerifications nonogival ( Figs 30–32 View FIGURES 30–36 ). Labrum chaetotaxy: 2/2, 4. Labium as in Fig. 31 View FIGURES 30–36 . Maxilla styliform ( Fig. 34 View FIGURES 30–36 ), mandible thin and tridentate ( Fig. 33 View FIGURES 30–36 ).
Dorsal chaetotaxy and tubercles. Central area of head with complete chaetotaxy ( Fig. 30 View FIGURES 30–36 , Tab. 2a View TABLE 2 ). Tubercles Cl and Af separate. Tubercles Dl and (L+So) on head with 6 and 8 chaetae respectively. Tubercles Di on Th. I not differentiated ( Fig. 30 View FIGURES 30–36 ). Thorax and abdomen without free chaetae. Tubercles De on Th. II and III with 3+s and 4+s chaetae respectively. Tubercle L on Abd. IV with 6 chaetae, one chaeta free. Abd. IV and V with 8 and 3 tubercles respectively. Cryptopygy absent, Abd. VI visible from above.
Ventral chaetotaxy. On head, groups Vea, Vem and Vep with 3, 4, 4 chaetae respectively. Group Vi on head with 6 chaetae (fig. 31). On Abd. IV, furca rudimentary with 6 mesochaetae and without microchaetae ( Fig. 35 View FIGURES 30–36 ). On Abd. V, chaetae Vl and L’ present.
Legs. Chaetotaxy of legs as in Tab. 2C View TABLE 2 . Claw without internal tooth. On tibiotarsi, chaeta M present and chaetae B4 and B5 short and pointed.
Etymology. Named after the endemic tree Zelkova abelicea where new species was found.
Remarks. Morphologically, Endonura zelkovae sp. nov. strongly recalls E. levantica Smolis, Deharveng & Kaprus’, 2011, species described recently form Israel ( Smolis et al. 2011). Nevertheless, the new species can be distinguished by the number of chaetae De on Th. II and III (in E. zelkovae sp. nov. 3+s and 4+s respectively, in E. levantica 2+s and 3+s respectively), presence/absence of prelabral chaetae (in E. zelkovae sp. nov. two chaetae present, in E. levantica chaetae absent) and presence/absence of microchaetae on furca (in E. zelkovae sp. nov. absent, in E. levantica present). The new species is also similar to E. deharvengi Cassagnau et Péja, 1979 , a form shortly described from Greece ( Cassagnau & Péja 1979) and recently redescribed ( Smolis 2016). They differ in body size (in E. zelkovae sp. nov. 1 mm, in E. deharvengi 2.10–2.50 mm), number of chaetae Dl on head (in E. zelkovae sp. nov. 6 chaetae, in E. deharvengi 5 chaetae, chaeta Dl3 absent), number of chaetae De on Th. II and III (in E. zelkovae sp. nov. 3+s and 4+s, in E. deharvengi 2+s and 3+s) and location of chaetae Di3 on Th. II and III (in E. zelkovae sp. nov. located within tubercle Di, in E. deharvengi free).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |