Piezophyllus Hope, 1842
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4323.2.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B581F0D0-Edb5-4950-Bd80-99F99996F8A9 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6009942 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/523387F6-9F2C-CF43-FF05-FCF2FE32F8CD |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Piezophyllus Hope, 1842 |
status |
|
Genus Piezophyllus Hope, 1842
Piezophilus Hope, 1842 : Costa et al. (1992): 879 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling ( ICZN 1999, Art. 33.3)]. Cladocerus Gemminger & Harold, 1869: 1509; synonymized by Hyslop (1921): 664. Coresus Candèze, 1891: 49 ; synonymized by Fleutiaux (1932): 155.
Dido Arnett, 1955: 600 ; synonymized by Laurent (1967): 97.
Hopelater Laurent, 1967: 99 ; synonymized by Costa et al. (1994): 120.
Type species of Piezophyllus . Tetralobus robustus Hope, 1842 (= synonym of P. macrocerus ).
Type species of Cladoceru s. Tetralobus macrocerus Laporte, 1838 .
Type species of Coresus . Tetralobus macrocerus Laporte, 1838 .
Type species of Dido . Tetralobus macrocerus Laporte, 1838 .
Type species of Hopelater . Piezophyllus spencei Hope, 1842 .
Literature. Hope (1842): original description; Lacordaire (1857): remarks; Candèze (1859): catalogue; Gemminger & Harold (1869): catalogue; Candèze (1891): catalogue; Fleutiaux (1902): species descriptions; Schwarz (1906): catalogue; Hyslop (1921): information on type species, Schenkling (1925): catalogue; Fleutiaux (1932): species description; Fleutiaux (1935): remark; Fleutiaux (1940): transfer to Tetralobinae ; Arnett (1955): remarks on type species; Basilewsky (1958): remark; Laurent (1967): revision; Girard (1971): catalogue, Costa et al. (1992): remark; Calder et al. (1993): remark; Costa et al. (1994): revision; Girard (2003): catalogue, resurrection of Hopelater ; Costa et al. (2010): handbook of zoology; Bouchard et al. (2011): nomenclature; Bousquet (2016): remark.
Remark 1. Hyslop (1921) erroneously designated T. spencei Hope, 1842 as the type species of Piezophyllus [see Laurent (1967) for more details].
Remark 2. Hopelater Laurent, 1967 was originally described as a subgenus in Piezophyllus Hope, 1842 . Costa et al. (1994) synonymized Hopelater with Piezophyllus based on a morphological analysis. Girard (2003) erected Hopelater to generic level. Herein, we follow the classification proposed by Costa et al. (1994) until more detailed investigation is carried out.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Piezophyllus Hope, 1842
Kundrata, Robin 2017 |
Hopelater
Laurent 1967: 99 |
Costa et al. (1994) : 120 |
Dido
Laurent 1967: 97 |
Arnett 1955: 600 |
Piezophilus
Fleutiaux 1932: 155 |
Hyslop 1921: 664 |
Candeze 1891: 49 |
Gemminger 1869: 1509 |
Costa et al. (1992) : 879 |
Piezophyllus
Hope 1842: 76 |