Pseudaletia unipuncta
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1653/024.099.0102 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/543C87EB-FF81-FFB9-8896-4633FD75FACF |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Pseudaletia unipuncta |
status |
|
Pseudaletia unipuncta View in CoL
The retention of crop residue resulted in significantly greater insect-inflicted damage in all locations and years; all unburned plots received damage by P. unipuncta . The treatment effect was the greatest source of variation (F = 107.3; df = 1; P <0.0001), greatly surpassing the year effect (F = 5.99; df = 2; P = 0.0027) and the location effect (F = 2.98; df = 2; P = 0.0538). The interactions year*treatment and location*treatment were significant at P <0.05 and P <0.10, respectively ( Table 1).
Damage by P. unipuncta was observed only in the “residue retained” treatment at the 3 locations evaluated during the entire period of the study. The 1-sample t -test showed that damage was significantly different from zero in all locations and years. The “residue burned” plots showed no damage by P. unipuncta during the course of the study. Maximum injury levels obtained were 9, 16 and 16% in Fronterita, Luisiana, and Simoca, respectively ( Fig. 1b View Fig ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |