Ibotyporanga xique Huber, 2024

Huber, Bernhard A., Meng, Guanliang, Král, Jiří, Ávila Herrera, Ivalú M. & Carvalho, Leonardo S., 2024, Diamonds in the rough: Ibotyporanga (Araneae, Pholcidae) spiders in semi-arid Neotropical environments, European Journal of Taxonomy 963, pp. 1-169 : 59-66

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2024.963.2687

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BA331360-A678-4233-A7CC-7308EF8B6D7E

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6039E865-43D5-4401-8FA8-E96C4EA711C4

taxon LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:act:6039E865-43D5-4401-8FA8-E96C4EA711C4

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Ibotyporanga xique Huber
status

sp. nov.

Ibotyporanga xique Huber sp. nov.

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:6039E865-43D5-4401-8FA8-E96C4EA711C4

Figs 22A View Fig , 25H–I View Fig , 42 View Fig , 51–54 View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig

Diagnosis

Males are easily distinguished from most known congeners (except I. xakriaba sp. nov.) by general shape of procursus ( Fig. 52A–C View Fig ; short and wide, distally with semitransparent ventral flap), by very short palpal patella ( Fig. 51C View Fig ; dorsally clearly shorter than medially wide), and by short conical prolateral process on embolus (arrow in Fig. 52D View Fig ); from similar I. xakriaba by absence of dorsal process on procursus (cf. Fig. 48C View Fig ) and by absence of dorsal protrusion distally on palpal femur (cf. Fig. 47A View Fig ); males further distinguished from most known congeners (except I. xakriaba and I. itatim sp. nov.) by slender legs (tibia 1 L/d>15). Females are distinguished from most known congeners by trapezoidal epigynum with deep pocket and posterior lateral parts heavily sclerotized ( Fig. 54A–B View Fig ; similar in I. xakriaba and I. itatim ); females of I. xakriaba sp. nov. are possibly indistinguishable morphologically.

Etymology

The species name is derived from the type locality; noun in apposition.

Type material

Holotype

BRAZIL – Bahia • ♂; S of Xique-Xique , ‘loc. 3’; 11.0398° S, 42.7311° W; 430 m a.s.l.; 24 Nov. 2022; B.A. Huber and A.S. Michelotto leg.; CHNUFPI 5888. GoogleMaps

Paratypes

BRAZIL – Bahia • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; same collection data as for holotype; CHNUFPI 5889 GoogleMaps 1 ♂, 1 ♀; same collection data as for holotype; UFMG 31654 View Materials GoogleMaps 1 ♂; same collection data as for holotype; CHNUFPI 9029 [deposited in ZFMK Ar 24355] GoogleMaps .

Other material examined

BRAZIL – Bahia • 1 ♂, 4 ♀♀, in pure ethanol; same collection data as for holotype; CHNUFPI 5890 [deposited in ZFMK Br22-220; one female prosoma used for molecular work; two female abdomens transferred to ZFMK Ar 24355] GoogleMaps .

Description

Male (holotype) MEASUREMENTS. Total body length 2.3, carapace width 0.88. Distance PME–PME 85 µm; diameter PME 80 µm; distance PME–ALE 30 µm; distance AME–AME 15 µm; diameter AME 70 µm. Leg 1: 7.28

(2.15+0.30 +2.03 +2.25 + 0.55), tibia 2: 1.85, tibia 3: 1.40, tibia 4: 1.90; tibia 1 L/d: 20; diameters of leg femora 0.18–0.19, of leg tibiae 0.10.

COLOUR (in ethanol). Prosoma and legs mostly pale ochre, carapace medially and ocular area slightly darker, femora and tibiae with darker subdistal rings; abdomen gray, dorsally and laterally with darker internal marks; ventrally with indistinct plates in front of gonopore and in front of spinnerets.

BODY. Habitus as in Fig. 25H View Fig . Ocular area slightly raised. Carapace with distinct but shallow thoracic groove. Clypeus with sclerotized rim with median notch. Sternum slightly wider than long (0.62/0.56), with pair of very low and indistinct anterior processes near coxae 1. Abdomen globular.

CHELICERAE. As in Fig. 53A–B View Fig ; with strongly curved median frontal apophysis; stridulatory files very fine and poorly visible in dissecting microscope.

PALPS. As in Fig. 51 View Fig ; coxa unmodified; trochanter with short rounded ventral protrusion; femur proximally with distinct retrolateral process directed toward distal, with prolateral stridulatory pick, distally widened but unmodified; femur-patella joints not shifted toward one side; patella much shorter than wide; tibia almost globular; tibia-tarsus joints not shifted toward one side; tarsus without dorsal process; procursus ( Fig. 52A–C View Fig ) short, with light prolateral band, distally with membranous ventral process; genital bulb ( Fig. 52D–F View Fig ) with wide prolateral sclerite on bulbous part, with short conical prolateral process on embolus.

LEGS. Without spines but with longer and slightly stronger hairs ventrally on femora; without curved hairs; with several rows of short vertical hairs on tibia 1; retrolateral trichobothrium of tibia 1 at 57%; prolateral trichobothrium absent on tibia 1; tarsus 1 with ~4–5 pseudosegments, distally fairly distinct, proximally apparently irregular.

Variation (male)

Dark marks on carapace and legs in other males barely visible or absent. Tibia 1 in five males (incl. holotype): 1.70–2.05 (mean 1.93).

Female

In general, similar to male ( Fig. 25I View Fig ) but slightly darker ochre, carapace also with indistinct lateral and radial marks; color variable as in male, one female with very distinct dark rings on legs, also proximally on tibiae; clypeus and sternum unmodified; tibia 1 with few short vertical hairs. Tibia 1 length in five females: 1.65–1.95 (mean 1.76). Epigynum ( Fig. 54A–B View Fig ) anterior plate trapezoidal to bell-shaped, posterior lateral parts heavily sclerotized, posterior margin with pair of lateral indentations, with deep anterior pocket; posterior plate short and wide. Internal genitalia ( Fig. 54C–G View Fig ) very short, with pair of very narrow pore plates, complex system of lateral membranous structures (ducts and pouches?).

Distribution

Known from type locality only, in Brazil, Bahia ( Fig. 42 View Fig ).

Natural history

The specimens were collected on a rock field with thorny shrubs and scattered trees ( Fig. 22A View Fig ). The spiders were beaten out of dead branches. One egg sac was slightly flattened, had a diameter of 2.0, and an egg diameter of 0.62; the total number of eggs was estimated to be ~25.

Ibotyporanga camarai Huber sp. nov.

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:7B8BAD09-C01C-4F8E-95E2-9C9B089E22F6

Figs 42 View Fig , 55A–B View Fig , 56–59 View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig

Diagnosis

Males are easily distinguished from all known congeners by shape of procursus ( Fig. 57A–C View Fig ; short, proximally strongly curved, distally with slender semitransparent tip curved towards dorsal); also by distinctive prolateral apophysis on embolus (arrows in Fig. 57D–E View Fig ). Females differ from known congeners by internal genitalia with distinctive transversal membranous structure and large, apparently non-expandable membranous sac ( Figs 58C View Fig , 59B–C View Fig ).

Etymology

The species name honors Hélder Câmara (1909–1999), informally called the “bishop of the slums”, who served as a Brazilian archbishop from 1964 to 1985, opposing the military dictatorship.

Type material

Holotype

BRAZIL – Pernambuco • ♂; NE of Petrolina ; 9.1957° S, 40.3832° W; 440 m a.s.l.; 30 Nov. 2022; B.A. Huber and A.S. Michelotto leg.; CHNUFPI 5891. GoogleMaps

Paratype

BRAZIL – Pernambuco • 1 ♂; same collection data as for holotype; CHNUFPI 5892 [deposited in ZFMK Ar 24356] GoogleMaps .

Other material examined

BRAZIL – Pernambuco • 1 ♂, 1♀, in pure ethanol; same collection data as for holotype; CHNUFPI 5893 [deposited in ZFMK Br22-243; female abdomen cleared and transferred to ZFMK Ar 24256] GoogleMaps .

Description

Male (holotype) MEASUREMENTS. Total body length 2.0, carapace width 0.80. Distance PME–PME 70 µm; diameter PME 85 µm; distance PME–ALE 25 µm; distance AME–AME 15 µm; diameter AME 65 µm. Leg 1: 4.60

(1.27+0.30 +1.13 +1.43 + 0.47), tibia 2: 0.92, tibia 3: 0.83, tibia 4: 1.20; tibia 1 L/d: 10; diameters of leg femora 0.17–0.18, of leg tibiae 0.11.

COLOUR (in ethanol). Prosoma and legs mostly ochre-yellow, carapace medially with brown mark including ocular area, legs with indistinct dark rings on femora (subdistally) and tibiae (proximally and subdistally); abdomen pale gray with dark internal marks dorsally and laterally; ventrally with light ochre plates in front of gonopore and in front of spinnerets.

BODY. Habitus as in Fig. 55A View Fig . Ocular area slightly raised. Carapace with distinct but shallow thoracic groove. Clypeus with sclerotized rim with median notch. Sternum wider than long (0.54/0.44), with pair of very low and indistinct anterior processes near coxae 1. Abdomen globular.

CHELICERAE. As in Fig. 58A–B View Fig ; width 0.31; with strong median frontal apophysis; stridulatory files fine but clearly visible in dissecting microscope.

PALPS. As in Fig. 56 View Fig ; coxa unmodified; trochanter with rounded prolateral-ventral protrusion; femur proximally with prominent retrolateral process not directed toward distal, with prolateral stridulatory pick, distally widened but unmodified; femur-patella joints not shifted toward one side; patella dorsally slightly longer than medially wide; tibia-tarsus joints not shifted toward one side; tarsus with low and indistinct dorsal process; procursus ( Fig. 57A–C View Fig ) with light prolateral band, distally with membranous element curved towards dorsal and small subdistal process; genital bulb ( Fig. 57D–F View Fig ) with distinct prolateral sclerite on bulbous part, with distinctive apophysis and membranous structures on embolus.

LEGS. Without spines but with longer and slightly stronger hairs ventrally on femora; without curved hairs; with several rows of short vertical hairs on tibia 1; retrolateral trichobothrium of tibia 1 at 58%; prolateral trichobothrium absent on tibia 1; tarsus 1 with ~3–4 pseudosegments, distally distinct.

Variation (male)

Dark rings on legs distinct in other males. Tibia 1 in two other males: 1.03, 1.13.

Female

In general, similar to male ( Fig. 55B View Fig ) but slightly darker; clypeus unmodified; tibia 1 with few vertical hairs; tibia 1 length: 1.15. Epigynum ( Fig. 59A View Fig ) anterior plate oval to trapezoidal, posterior margin almost straight, with weakly curved, shallow anterior pocket; posterior plate short and simple. Internal genitalia ( Figs 58C View Fig , 59B–C View Fig ) with pair of pore plates, with distinctive transversal membranous structure and large, apparently non-expandable membranous sac.

Distribution

Known from type locality only, in Brazil, Pernambuco ( Fig. 42 View Fig ).

Natural history

The spiders were found on the border between a bare rock outcrop and the neighboring thorny woodland. The three males were found under dead bark on the ground; the female was found under a stone.

ZFMK

Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Araneae

Family

Pholcidae

Genus

Ibotyporanga

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF