Pterostichus (Oreophilus) flavofemoratus pinguis (Dejean, 1828)
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.352.6294 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:946C3E2D-95DE-4FD7-8613-F46158017CB9 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/5BDF94CC-4F5E-D27A-9FF5-4A11BA801CDB |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Pterostichus (Oreophilus) flavofemoratus pinguis (Dejean, 1828) |
status |
|
Pterostichus (Oreophilus) flavofemoratus pinguis (Dejean, 1828) View in CoL
Pterostichus (Oreophilus) podgoricensis B. Guéorguiev, 2013: 59 (type locality: "Titograd Yugoslavia"), syn. n.
Type material.
Holotype ♂, "NHRS-JLKB 000020046" [typeset], "Titograd Yugoslavia" [handwritten], "coll. J. Ferrer" [handwritten], "HOLOTYPE Pterostichus podgoricensis sp. n. Guéorguiev des. 2012" [typeset red label] (NHRS). Paratype ♀, "Teneriffa Coll. O. Thieme" [typeset], "PARATYPE Pterostichus podgoricensis sp. n. Guéorguiev des. 2012" [typeset red label] (MNHUB). For additional data about these specimens see also Guéorguiev (2013: 59).
Other examined material.
Pterostichus flavofemoratus pinguis , 4♂♂, 5♀♀, Italy, valley de Gressoney (AO), Fontainemore, 1500 m, forest, 10.VIII.2004, leg. & det. G. Allegro (NMNHS).
Remarks.
Pterostichus podgoricensis has been described by the author after two specimens ( Guéorguiev 2013). Then I regarded this taxon as most allied to Pterostichus flavofemoratus (Dejean, 1828) and Pterostichus spinolae (Dejean, 1828). Following the publication, two colleagues (see Acknowledgements) informed me that my species may be conspecific with Pterostichus flavofemoratus pinguis , a form that I uncritically considered synonymous with Pterostichus flavofemoratus . The study of material of Pterostichus flavofemoratus pinguis from the Pennine Alps sent me by Gianni Allegro and its comparison with Pterostichus podgoricensis showed that the two taxa are identical.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |