Cyphocoleus parovicollis, Liebherr, 2016
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/dez.63.10241 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:45552C4E-C6AE-4F94-9998-0C2D492333B3 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/8894D2DB-88B0-4205-B69F-9C4A8C34245D |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:8894D2DB-88B0-4205-B69F-9C4A8C34245D |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Cyphocoleus parovicollis |
status |
sp. n. |
4. Cyphocoleus parovicollis View in CoL sp. n. Figures 50 View Figures 47–50 , 55-56 View Figures 51–59 , 63 View Figures 60–65 , 69 View Figures 66–75 , 78 View Figures 76–81
Diagnosis.
This species and its following adelphotaxon are difficult to diagnose practically (Figs 50 View Figures 47–50 , 82 View Figures 82–85 ), yet are clearly separate species. They can be diagnosed by the more convex eyes in beetles of this species, ocular ratio 1.47-1.55, and presence of four apical abdominal setae in males - two setae each side of apical visible abdominal ventrite - versus two apical abdominal setae - one each side - in males of Cyphocoleus ovicollis . The pronotum is generally narrower basally among individuals of this species - MPW/BPW = 1.87-2.10 - but the values overlap in the two species, with individuals of Cyphocoleus ovicollis ranging in values 2.04-2.29 for the same ratio. If a male is available, the identity based on abdominal setation can be confirmed based on the very different aedeagal internal sacs: that of Cyphocoleus parovicollis exhibiting an apical “cockscomb” of large, densely pack macrotrichia (Fig. 56 View Figures 51–59 ). The allopatric geographic distributions can assist in the sorting of these two species, with Cyphocoleus parovicollis distributed to the north of Cyphocoleus ovicollis (Fig. 78 View Figures 76–81 ). Standardized body length 9.4-12.1 mm.
Description
(n = 5). Head capsule moderately broad, gena elongate anterad constricted neck (Fig. 50 View Figures 47–50 ); frons broadly convex, but with variably developed chevron-shaped depression medially between eyes; supraorbital setae absent; mandibles elongate, length 2.5 × distance from antennal articulatory socket to anterolateral margin of labrum; antennae very elongate, scape length 4.33 × maximal breadth; supraorbital setae absent; gena glabrous, subgenal seta absent. Pronotum narrowly obovoid, MPW/PL = 0.78-0.88; front angles slightly protruded, right to slightly obtuse; lateral marginal bead continuous to obtuse-rounded basal angles and across straight median base; proepisternum bulging outward and so visible in dorsal view for middle half of pronotal length; median longitudinal impression deep, finely incised, terminated posteriorly in variably developed transverse depression; anterior transverse impression very shallow, obliquely paralleling anterior pronotal margin; prosternal process indistinctly depressed medially on ventral surface. Elytra narrowly subellipsoid, MEW/EL = 0.65-0.70; disc broadly and moderately convex; elytral striae deep, impunctate, associated intervals broadly convex; parascutellar seta present, socket not upraised above elytral surface; humeri very narrow, distinctly obtuse-angulate at base of fifth stria; elytral lateral margin convex laterad anterior series of lateral elytral setae; two to three dorsal elytral setae present (setae at anterior and middle positions always present, posterior seta present or absent); lateral elytral setae arranged as 6+ 1(0) + 7; subapical and apical setae present; subapical sinuation broadly and slightly concave, joining lateral margin in a broad curve; elytral apices tightly rounded, slightly separated from suture. Mesepisternum impunctate; metepisternum dorsal length 0.93 × diagonal width. Abdomen of males with distinct, narrow notch medially on apical margin of apical ventrite; females with two setae each side on apical margin of apical ventrite. Legs elongate, gracile, mt1 length/tibial length 0.26; metacoxae bisetose; tarsomeres with short, sparse seta on dorsum; mt4 outer lobe 1.5 × median length, 4-5 lateroventral setae each side. Microsculpture of frons transversely stretched isodiametric mesh to distinctly transverse mesh on vertex; pronotal disc with dense transverse-line microsculpture loosely organized into a mesh; elytral disc with dense transverse lines resulting in cyanotic to cupreous iridescence; pro-, meso-, and metasternum with sparse pelage of short microsetae, abdominal ventrites and dorsal body surface apparently glabrous. Coloration of head capsule rufopiceous, antennae rufobrunneous with piceous cast on antennomeres 1-3; pronotum piceous, proepipleuron and proepisternum rufopiceous; elytra rufopiceous; elytral epipleuron rufous, metepisternum rufopiceous; femora and tibiae rufobrunneous, tarsi rufoflavous.
Male genitalia (n = 4). Male aedeagal median lobe robust, broadly parallel sided to near distal margin of ostial opening, dorsoventral breadth at midlength 0.2 × distance from tip to base of closed basal bulb (Fig. 55 View Figures 51–59 ); lobe shaft brunneous, the internal sac obscured in uneverted position by the moderately melanized lobe wall; lobe apex with broadly rounded tip, tip skewed toward the left side of lobe, length distad ostial opening only slightly more than breadth; internal sac with apical “cockscomb” composed of densely packed, elongate, melanized, spike-like macrotrichia, the sac broadest at midlength (Fig. 56 View Figures 51–59 ).
Female reproductive tract (n = 2). Bursa copulatrix vase-shaped, basally stalked, distance from base of gonocoxites to spermathecal basal sclerite 1.8 × maximum breadth (dissection compressed under cover slip) (Fig. 63 View Figures 60–65 ); bursal walls thick, heavily pigmented by Chlorazol Black stain, with broad band of thick, densely packed spicules lining lumen over broadest part of bursa; basal gonocoxite with apical fringe of six setae, an additional small seventh seta observed in one individual (Fig. 69 View Figures 66–75 ); apical gonocoxite acuminate with narrowly rounded apex and three lateral ensiform setae.
Type.
Holotype male (QMB deposited in MNHN): NEW CALEDONIA 8682 / 20°58 ’Sx165°17’. 500m / Pic d’Amoa, N slopes / 24Nov2001. GBMonteith / Pyrethrum, trees & logs // QUEENSLAND / MUSEUM LOAN / Date: Nov. 2003 / no. LEN-1688 (green label) // Cyphocoleus / n. sp. / ovicollis male 9 / det. J.K. Liebherr 2015 // genitalia vial // HOLOTYPE / Cyphocoleus / parovipennis / J.K. Liebherr 2016 (black-bordered red label) .
Paratypes (30 specimens). NEW CALEDONIA: Mandjélia, above Pouébo 600-750 m el, 20°24'S, 164°32'E, 11-13-v-1984, Monteith & Cook (QMB,1); Mt. Panié refuge, 1300 m el., 20°34'S, 164°46'E, 16-18-xi-2000, Bouchard, Burwell & Monteith (QMB, 1; lot no. 9938); Pic d’Amoa, N slopes, 500 m el., hand collecting, 20°58'S, 165°17'E, 10-11-xi- 2001, Burwell & Monteith (QMB, 1; lot no. 8687); Aoupinié, 850 m el., 21°11'S, 165°19'E, 20-21-xi-2000, Bouchard, Burwell & Monteith (QMB, 2; lot no. 9930), summit, 1000 m el., pyrethrum trees & logs, 21°11'S, 165°16'E, 02-x-2004, Monteith (QMB, 1; lot no. 11665), 21°11'S, 165°19'E, 12 -xii-1993, Raven (QMB, 1); Me Maoya, near summit, 1400 m el., pyrethrum trees & logs, 21°22'S, 165°20'E, 12-xi-2002, Burwell & Monteith (QMB, 1; lot no. 11163); Me Maoya camp, 1150 m el., night collecting, 21°22'S, 165°20'E, 11-12-xi- 2002, Burwell, Monteith & Wright (QMB, 15; lot no. 11159), pyrethrum trees & logs, 11-13-xi-2002, Monteith & Burwell (QMB, 5; lot no. 11158); Me Maoya, near summit, 1300 m el., pyrethrum trees & logs, 21°22'S, 165°20'E, 12-xi-2002, Monteith & Burwell (QMB, 2; lot no. 11169) GoogleMaps .
Etymology.
The adelphotaxon status and great similarity of this species and Cyphocoleus ovicollis (Figs 46 View Figure 46 , 50 View Figures 47–50 , 82 View Figures 82–85 ) is signified through use of parovicollis as this species’ epithet: i.e. equal to ovicollis .
Distribution and habitat.
This species is distributed in the northern half of Grande Terre, allopatric with its adelphotaxon, Cyphocoleus ovicollis , which is distributed to the south (Fig. 78 View Figures 76–81 ). Beetles have been collected from tree trunks and downed logs via pyrethrin fog, and also by hand collecting at night.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |