Heterometrus Ehrenberg, 1828
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.1206/0003-0090.442.1.1 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/5E6CB374-FF26-6DE9-FF61-6168FED3DB8A |
treatment provided by |
Felipe (2021-08-30 19:46:52, last updated by Plazi 2023-11-06 03:54:38) |
scientific name |
Heterometrus Ehrenberg, 1828 |
status |
|
Heterometrus Ehrenberg, 1828 View in CoL
Figures 5 View FIGURE 5 , 7E, F, 8F, 9E, 10, 22–24, 36–38, 50–52, 53A–D, 67C–E, 68C–E, 69C–E, 70A–D, 71A–D, 72A–D, 157–192, table 2
Buthus (Heterometrus) Ehrenberg in Hemprich and Ehrenberg, 1828, pl. I, figs. 1, 2 (part), type species by subsequent designation ( Karsch, 1879a: 20): Buthus View in CoL
(Heterometrus) spinifer Ehrenberg, 1828 View in CoL
[= Heterometrus spinifer (Ehrenberg, 1828) ]; Hemprich and Ehrenberg, 1829: 351, 352; 1831 [pages unnumbered].
Buthus (Heterometros) : Hemprich and Ehrenberg, 1829: 351.
Centrurus Ehrenberg in Hemprich and Ehrenberg, 1829: 350, type species by subsequent monotypy: Centrurus galbineus C.L. Koch, 1838 [= Heterometrus longimanus ( Herbst, 1800) View in CoL ] (synonymized by Kraepelin, 1894: 34).
Palamnaeus Thorell, 1876a: 13 , type species by original designation: Palamnaeus petersii Thorell, 1876 ; 1876b: 84; Pocock, 1892: 38 (part); 1893b: 307 (part); Laurie, 1896a: 193; 1896b: 128; Pocock, 1896a: 77; 1900a: 84; Tikader, 1973: 263; Couzijn, 1981: 5, 75, 86.
Caucon Karsch, 1879a: 14 , type species by original designation: Centrurus galbineus C.L. Koch, 1838 [= Heterometrus longimanus ( Herbst, 1800) View in CoL ] (synonymized by Kraepelin, 1894: 34).
Heterometrus: Karsch, 1879a: 20 View in CoL ; Ausser, 1880: 466; Laurie, 1896a: 193; 1896b: 128; Kraepelin, 1899: 106, 107; 1904: 198, 199; 1905: 344; 1913: 165; Birula, 1917a: 161; 1917b: 59; Kopstein, 1921: 128, 129; 1927: 107; Fage, 1933: 27, 28; Werner, 1934: 277; Fage, 1936: 179, 180; Kästner, 1941: 233; Vachon, 1953 c: 9, fig. 1; 1963: 162, fig. 4; Bücherl, 1964: 59; Couzijn, 1978: 327, 331; Daling- water, 1980: 286; Couzijn, 1981: 3–6, 8, 26, 32, 47, 48, 50, 52, 60, 64, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 101, 130, 133, 145, 167, 178, 179, 181, 183– 189, 191, tables 7, 8, 9, figs. 66a, 68, 70, 71; Tikader and Bastawade, 1983: 2, 6, 7, 518, 519; Biswas, 1984: 320; Francke, 1985: 8, 18; Lourenço, 1989: 174; Mahsberg, 1990: 269, 271; Sissom, 1990 a: 136; Nenilin and Fet, 1992: 19, 20; Braunwalder and Fet, 1998: 31; Kovařík, 1998: 136; Fet, 2000: 431; Lourenço, 2000: 25; Prendini, 2000a: 2, 4, 27, 28 34, 35 44, 50, 53, 57, 61, 62, 70, tables 1, 2, 10; Indra, 2001: 55; Bastawade, 2002: 95, 295; Lourenço and Huber, 2002: 273; Prendini et al., 2003: 185–191, 194, 199, 200, 202–206, 208–210, 212–214, 217, 218, 220, 222, 223, 226, 229, 230, 234, 235, 237, 250–
259, tables 1, 2, 6, 8, 9, figs. 1, 3, appendices 1, 2 (part); Soleglad and Fet, 2003a: 58, 88, 113, 115, 116, table 9; Bastawade et al., 2004: 47; Kovařík, 2004: 1, 2, 4, 7, 49, 51, 53 tables 2, 3 (part); Bastawade et al., 2005: 77;
Prendini and Wheeler, 2005: 460, 477, 482; Bastawade, 2006a: 134; Booncham et al., 2007: 43 (part); Shultz, 2007: 78, 84, 86–91, table 1, figs. 2–5; Bastawade, 2008: 133, 136; Bastawade and Borkar, 2008: 212; Bastawade, 2009: 215; Kovařík, 2009: 1–3, 14–16, 28, 33, 34, 46, 49, 99–101 (part); Mirza and Sanap, 2009: 486 (part); Javed et al., 2010a: 143; Mirza et al., 2012: 1, 2 (part); Di et al., 2013: 86, 88, 94, 96; Tahir and Prendini, 2014: 1–5, 11, 20, 21, fig. 1 (part); Kovařík et al., 2016: 96, 100; Plíšková et al., 2016: 467–469, 474; Rossi, 2016a: 6–9, 15, 19, 20, 25 (part); Aswathi and Sureshan, 2017: 9847; Esposito et al., 2017: 4, 14; Pham et al., 2017: 133, 136; Esposito et al., 2018: 89, 90, 110, 115, appendix 1.
Scorpio (Buthus) (nec Leach, 1815): Lankester, 1885: 379.
Scorpio View in CoL (nec Linnaeus, 1758): Laurie, 1896a: 193; Lönnberg, 1897a: 197 (part).
Heterometrus (Heterometrus) : Couzijn, 1978: 330; 1981: 80, 83, 86, 121, 161, 173–177, 180, 182–184, 186–188, 191, table 14, figs. 62–65, 66b, 69, 70; Tikader and Bastawade, 1983: 519, 520 (part); Biswas, 1984: 320; Francke, 1985: 8, 18; Fet, 2000: 431, 432; Prendini, 2000a: 44; Prendini et al., 2003: 222, 252, appendix 1; Bastawade et al., 2004: 47; Bastawade and Borkar, 2008: 212, 218.
Herometrus: Bastawade and Borkar, 2008: 218.
Haterometrus: Bastawade, 2009: 218.
DIAGNOSIS: Species of Heterometrus may be separated from other Asian scorpionid genera as follows. The carapace is vaulted, the lateral surfaces sloping steeply (figs. 22–24) in Heterometrus , but slightly to markedly dorsoventrally compressed, the lateral surfaces sloping gently, in all except two species of Deccanometrus , D. latimanus and D. xanthopus , all except two species of Sahyadrimetrus , S. mathewi and S. scaber , all except three species of Chersonesometrus , C. fulvipes , C. madraspatensis , and C. shivashankari , and three species of Srilankametrus , S. indus , S. pococki , and S. serratus . The carapace anterior margin is concave, with the frontal lobes uneven and sloping medially in Heterometrus , whereas the anterior margin is straight, with the frontal lobes evenly rounded or truncate in Gigantome- trus, Srilankametrus , two species of Deccanometrus , D. latimanus and D. xanthopus , and some species of Chersonesometrus . The carapace anterolateral margins converge gradually anteriorly in Heterometrus but are subparallel anteriorly in Javanimetrus and Srilankametrus ; the mediolateral margins converge markedly posteriorly (at the posterolateral sulci) in Heterometrus but diverge or converge slightly posteriorly (at the posterolateral sulci) in all other genera, and three species of Sahyadrimetrus , S. barberi , S. rugosus , and S. tikaderi . The carapace rostrolateral margin is distinctly incised adjacent to the posterior lateral ocelli in Heterometrus but entire in all the other genera. Anterocular extensions of the superciliary carinae are present in Heterometrus but absent in Srilankametrus . The median ocelli are relatively large, the distance between them less than the width of an ocellus in Heterometrus but relatively small, the distance between them equal to or greater than the width of an ocellus in the other genera; the median ocular tubercle is situated anteromedially to medially, the distance from carapace anterior margin: carapace length (CAM:CL) 0.40–0.50 in Heterometrus , but posteromedially, CAM:CL 0.51–0.62 in Chersonesometrus . The interocular suture is absent in Heterometrus but present in Chersonesometrus , Gigantometrus , and all except one species of Deccanometrus , and two species of Srilankametrus . The carapace posterior sutures are present, extending to the median ocular tubercle, and connected by a short cross-suture anterior to the postocular depression in Heterometrus ; present, extending past the median ocular tubercle, and connected anteriorly to the posterior bifurcations of the interocular suture or disconnected in Chersonesometrus , Deccanometrus , Gigantometrus , and most species of Srilankametrus ; and absent in Javanimetrus , Sahyadrimetrus , and two species of Srilankametrus . The cheliceral movable finger prodistal (DI) and retrodistal (DE) teeth are subequal, with the DE tooth only slightly smaller than the DI tooth, and opposable, i.e., forming a bicusp in Heterometrus but unequal, with the DE tooth considerably smaller than the DI tooth, aligned longitudinally and not opposable in Gigantometrus , Javanimetrus , Sahyadrimetrus , Srilankametrus , most Deccanometrus , and some Chersonesometrus . The pedipalp patella dorsomedian carina of the female is absent or obsolete (figs. 161, 190) in Heterometrus , but predominantly granular or costate in Chersonesometrus , Gigantometrus , and all except three species of Deccanometrus , D. latimanus , D. liurus , and D. ubicki . The patella retromedian carinae of the female are absent or obsolete in Heterometrus , but granular or costate in Chersonesometrus , three species of Deccanometrus , D. bengalensis , D. obscurus , and D. phipsoni , three species of Sahyadrimetrus , S. barberi , S. rugosus , and S. tikaderi , and two species of Srilankametrus , S. gravimanus and S. yaleensis . The prominent spiniform granule of the patella proventral carina is present (figs. 161, 166, 171, 176, 181, 186, 190) in Heterometrus but absent in all the other genera. The patella dorsal, retrodorsal, and retroventral intercarinal surfaces of the female are smooth or nearly so (figs. 161, 190) in Heterometrus but granular in all species of Chersonesometrus except C. nathanorum . The pedipalp chela of the adult male is sparsely setose (figs. 162, 167B, 168, 172, 177B–D, 182B, 183, 187B, 188, 191A) in Heterometrus but moderately to densely setose in Sahyadrimetrus , all species of Deccanometrus except D. xanthopus , one species of Srilankametrus , and some species of Chersonesometrus . The distance between the chela manus dorsomedian and promedian carinae or setal rows (DMC–PMC) is similar to the distance between the promedian and proventral carinae or setal rows (PMC–PVC) in Heterometrus whereas the DMC–PMC is slightly to markedly greater than the PMC–PVC in all other genera. The dorsomedian carina becomes obsolete proximally in Heterometrus but is continuous to the proximal edge of the manus in Chersonesometrus , Gigantometrus , and two species of Deccanometrus , D. obscurus and D. phipsoni . The chela manus dorsal secondary, subdigital, and digital carinae (setal rows) are well separated along their entire length in Heterometrus whereas the proximal half of the dorsal secondary carina, distal half of the subdigital carina and distal third of the digital carina are closely adjacent in Chersonesometrus and Gigantomentrus. The dorsal secondary and subdigital carinae of the male are absent or obsolete in Heterometrus but present and entirely to predominantly granular or costate in Gigantometrus , all species of Chersonesometrus except C. bastawadei and C. fulvipes , and all species of Srilankametrus except S. indus and S. pococki . The chela manus digital and retromedian carinae are similarly developed (figs. 162, 163, 167, 172, 173, 177, 182, 187, 191) in Heterometrus whereas the retromedian carina is more pronounced than the digital carina in Chersonesometrus . The retromedian carina of the male is absent or obsolete in Heterometrus but entirely to predominantly granular in Gigantometrus , Srilankametrus caesar , and S. serratus , and entirely to predominantly costate in Chersonesometrus , Srilankametrus couzijni , S. gravimanus , and S. yaleensis . The depression in the dorsal surface of the chela manus, proximal to the fixed finger of the adult male, is present and distinct (figs. 162, 167B, 172, 177B–D, 182B, 187B, 191A) in Heterometrus but absent or obsolete in all the other genera. The chela manus dorsal surface is without reticulation (figs. 172, 173, 177, 182, 187) in all except three species of Heterometrus , H. glaucus , H. laevigatus , and H. thorellii , in which the dorsal surface is shallowly reticulate (figs. 162, 163, 167, 191) as in Javanimetrus , Sahyadrimetrus , and all except two species of Deccanometrus , D. obscurus and D. phipsoni ; the dorsal surface is smooth in Heterometrus but finely to coarsely granular in Chersonesometrus , Gigantometrus , Srilankametrus , all species of Deccanometrus except D. ubicki , and all except two species of Sahyadrimetrus , S. kanarensis and S. tikaderi . The chela manus retrolateral intercarinal surfaces are smooth or nearly so in Heterometrus but granular in Chersonesometrus , Gigantometrus , Srilankametrus , all species of Deccanometrus except D. ubicki , and some species of Sahyadrimetrus . The chela manus ventral surface is flat, with the axes of the retroventral and ventromedian carinae in approximately the same plane in Heterometrus
.
aspects
ventral
.
B
and
dorsal
.
A
:
habitus
,
India
,
Rangamatia
,
)
AMNH
(
♂
,
.
nov
.
comb
,
)
1841
,
Koch
.
L
.
C
(
Deccanometrus mm.
. 10
119 =
FIGURE Scale bar
.
mm
10
=
bar
Scale
.
aspects
ventral
.
B
and
dorsal
.
A
:
habitus
,
)
9071133
CAS
(
♀
,
.
nov
.
comb
,
)
1841
,
Koch
.
L
.
C
(
.
120
FIGURE but angled, with the axis of the retroventral carina ventral to the axis of the ventromedian carina in Javanimetrus , four species of Chersonesometrus , C. beccaloniae , C. hendersoni , C. pelekomanus , and C. tristis , and two species of Srilankametrus , S. indus and S. pococki . The pro- and retrolateral surfaces of the tibiae of legs I and II each bear scattered, setiform macrosetae, not arranged in a definite row, in Heterometrus and a row of two or three spiniform macrosetae in all the other genera. Macroseta st on the retroventral surface of the basitarsus of leg I is usually setiform (figs. 50–52, 53A–D) in Heterometrus but spiniform in all the other genera, and sb on the retroventral surface of the basitarsus of leg III is often setiform in Heterometrus but spiniform in Javanimetrus and Sahyadrimetrus . The pseudonychium (dactyl) of the telotarsi of legs I–IV is prominent and acuminate in Heterometrus but usually reduced and rounded in the other genera. The pectinal first proximal median lamella (scape) of the female is distinctly angular,> 90° but <180° (figs. 36–38) in Heterometrus but straight or shallowly curved in Srilankametrus . The mesial surfaces of mesosomal tergites I–VI of the male are smooth in Heterometrus , but granular in Gigantometrus , one species of Deccanometrus , D. xanthopus , two species of Sahyadrimetrus , S. mathewi and S. scaber , and some species of Chersonesometrus . The lengths of metasomal segments I and II are approximately equal to or less than their respective widths (figs. 67C–E, 69C–E, 70A–D, 72A–D) in Heterometrus but markedly greater than their respective widths in Gigantometrus . The ventrosubmedian and ventrolateral carinae are granular or costate-granular on metasomal segment IV only and costate on segments I–III (figs. 68C–E, 69C–E, 71B, D, 72B, D) in all except two species of Heterometrus , H. laoticus and H. silenus , in which the carinae are granular on segments I–IV, II–IV (costate on I), or III and IV (costate on I and II) (figs. 71A, C, 72A, C), as in Gigantometrus . The ventral intercarinal surfaces of metasomal segment IV are usually smooth (figs. 69C–E, 72A–D) in Heterometrus but sparsely granular in Javanimetrus . The dorsosubmedian carinae of metasomal segment V are absent (figs. 67C–E, 70A–D) in Heterometrus but vestigial or partial in all other genera. The dorsal intercarinal surface of segment V is smooth in Heterometrus but granular in Gigantometrus , and some species of Chersonesometrus and Srilankametrus . The width of the telson vesicle is approximately equal to or less than the width of metasomal segment V in the female of Heterometrus but greater than the width of segment V in the female of Gigantometrus and the vesicle is elongate in Heterometrus but globose in Chersonesometrus , Deccanometrus , Gigantometrus , and three species of Srilankametrus , S. indus , S. pococki , and S. serratus .
INCLUDED SPECIES: As redefined in the present contribution, Heterometrus accommodates eight species formerly assigned to the nominotypical subgenus by various authors ( Couzijn, 1981; Tikader and Bastawade, 1983; Fet, 2000), that were recovered as a monophyletic group by phylogenetic analysis of morphological characters and DNA sequences from the nuclear and mitochondrial genomes (fig. 10): Heterometrus glaucus (Thorell, 1876) , comb. nov. et stat. rev.; Heterometrus laevigatus (Thorell, 1876) , comb. nov. et stat. rev.; Heterometrus laoticus Couzijn, 1981 ; Heterometrus longimanus ( Herbst, 1800) ; Heterometrus petersii (Thorell, 1876) ; Heterometrus silenus (Simon, 1884) , comb. nov. et stat. rev.; Heterometrus spinifer (Ehrenberg, 1828) ; Heterometrus thorellii ( Pocock, 1892) .
DISTRIBUTION: The genus Heterometrus is distributed throughout Southeast Asia (figs. 5, 157, 158), from the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, throughout Indochina, the Thai-Malay Peninsula and offshore islands (Ko Chang, Ko Lanta, Ko Muk, Ko Samui, Langkawi, the Myeik archipelago, Penang, the Phi Phi Islands, Phuket, Phú Quoc Island, Tioman, Tinggi and Singapore), the Riau archipelago, Sumatra, Weh, Simeulue, Babi, Nias, the Batu archipelago, Siberut, the Mentawai archipelago, Bangka, Belitung, Java, Madura, Bali, Borneo, Miang-Besar, and the Philippine islands of Balabac, Mindanao, Luzon, Palawan, Panay, and Tawi Tawi in the Sulu archipelago, to Wallace’s Line (table 2). Reports of Heterometrus from the Indonesian islands of Sulawesi and Halmahera ( Meise, 1932: 662; Takashima, 1945: 90), to the east of Wallace’s Line, have never been confirmed (Couziijn, 1981: 175). The genus has been recorded from the following countries: Brunei, Cambodia, India, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam. Its distribution overlaps with that of Javanimetrus in Borneo, Luzon, Nias, the Nicobar Islands, Sumatra, and Thailand.
ECOLOGY: Heterometrus species occur in primary and secondary evergreen rainforests, deciduous and semideciduous forests, plantations, agricultural fields, and backyards, from sea level to 1315 m elevation. Most species of the genus are fossorial and pelophilous, although some appear to be lapidicolous or corticolous ( Prendini, 2001b). Whereas some Heterometrus were collected under stones or logs during daytime, most were collected with UV detection or flashlights at night, doorkeeping at or near burrow entrances, or walking on the ground after rains. Many Heterometrus appear to vacate their burrows during the monsoon season.
In several species of Heterometrus , e.g., H. longimanus and H. spinifer , mixed age groups of related and unrelated individuals cohabit with minimal aggression or cannibalism in laboratory terraria ( Harrison, 1954; Polis and Lourenço, 1986) and, according to some evidence, this also occurs in the wild ( Schultze, 1927).
CONSERVATION STATUS: Several species of Heterometrus are extensively harvested for the commercial trade in exotic pets. The most commonly traded species are H. silenus , apparently exported from Vietnam and, to a lesser extent, H. spinifer , exported from Malaysia, and H. petersii , exported from Malaysia and Singapore. Heterometrus spinifer is now protected in Malaysia. Heterometrus laevigatus and H. laoticus are occasionally available, apparently exported from Thailand, where H. laoticus is also harvested for consumption ( Menzel and D’Aluisio, 1998).
Aswathi, K., and P. M. Sureshan. 2017. Additions to the scorpion fauna (Arachnida: Scorpiones) of Kerala, India, with an illustrated key to the genera. Journal of Threatened Taxa 9: 9844 - 9850.
Bastawade, D. B. 2002. Scorpion diversity. In A. P Jagtap and N. P. Singh (editors), Biodiversity of the Western Ghats of Maharashtra. Current Knowledge: 94, 95, 294 - 296. Dehra Dun: Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh.
Bastawade, D. B., P. M. Sureshan, and C. Radhakrishnan. 2004. An illustrated key to the identification of scorpions (Scorpionida: Arachnida) of Kerala and notes on some interesting new records. Records of the Zoological Survey of India 103: 43 - 58.
Bastawade, D. B., P. M. Sureshan, and C. Radhakrishnan. 2005. A new subfamily, genus and species of scorpion (Arachnida: Scorpionida) from India. Records of the Zoological Survey of India 104: 77 - 82.
Bastawade, D. B. 2006 a. Arachnida: Scorpionida and Amblypygi. In Fauna of Sanjay Gandhi National Park (Invertebrates). Zoological Survey of India, Conservation Area Series 26: 131 - 138.
Bastawade, D. B., and M. Borkar. 2008. Arachnida (Orders Scorpiones, Uropygi, Amblypygi, Araneae and Phalangida). In Fauna of Goa. Zoological Survey of India, State Fauna Series 16: 211 - 242.
Bastawade, D. B. 2009. Arachnida: Scorpiones. In Fauna of Bhimashankar Wildlife Sanctuary. Zoological Survey of India, Conservation Area Series 42: 215 - 222.
Birula, A. A. 1917 a. Arachnoidea Arthrogastra Caucasica. Pars I. Scorpiones. Zapiski Kavkazskogo Muzeya [Memoires du Musee du Caucase]. Tiflis: Imprimerie de la Chancellerie du Comite pour la Transcaucasie A (5): 1 - 253. [in Russian; English translation: A. A. Byalynitskii-Birulya. 1964. Arthrogastric arachnids of Caucasia. 1. Scorpions. Jerusalem: Israel Program for Scientific Translations, 170 pp.]
Birula, A. A. 1917 b. Faune de la Russie et des pays limitrophes fondee principalement sur les collections du Musee Zoologique de l'Academie des Sciences de Russie. Arachnides (Arachnoidea). Petrograd 1 (1): xx, 1 - 227. [in Russian; English translation: A. A. Byalynitskii-Birulya. 1965. Fauna of Russia and Adjacent Countries. Arachnoidea. Vol. I. Scorpions. Jerusalem: Israel Program for Scientific Translations, xix, 154 pp.]
Biswas, A. T. 1984. Scorpions (Scorpiones). In Fauna of Rajaji National Park. Zoological Survey of India, Fauna of Conservation Areas 5: 317 - 323.
Booncham, U., D. Sitthicharoenchai, A. O. Pradatsundarasar, S. Prasarnpun, and K. Thirakhupt. 2007. Sexual dimorphism in the Asian giant forest scorpion, Heterometrus laoticus Couzijn, 1981. NU International Journal of Science 4: 42 - 52.
Braunwalder, M. E., and V. Fet. 1998. On publications about scorpions (Arachnida, Scorpiones) by Hemprich and Ehrenberg (1828 - 1831). Bulletin of the British Arachnological Society 11: 29 - 35.
Bucherl, W. 1964. Distribucao geografica dos aracnoides peconhentos temiveis. Memorias do Instituto de Butantan 31: 55 - 66.
Couzijn, H. W. C. 1978. The method of polythetic analysis applied to a source of taxonomic difficulty: the genus Heterometrus H. and E., 1828 (Scorpionidae). Symposium of the Zoological Society of London 42: 327 - 333.
Couzijn, H. W. C. 1981. Revision of the genus Heterometrus. Zoologische Verhandelingen 184: 1 - 196.
Di, Z., X. Xu, Z. Cao, Y. Wu, and W. Li. 2013. Notes on the scorpions (Arachnida, Scorpiones) from Xizang with the redescription of Scorpiops jendeki Kovarik, 2000 (Scorpiones, Euscorpiidae) from Yunnan (China). ZooKeys 301: 51 - 99.
Esposito, L. A., H. Y. Yamaguti, C. A. Souza, R. Pinto-da- Rocha, and L. Prendini. 2017. Systematic revision of the Neotropical club-tailed scorpions, Physoctonus, Rhopalurus, and Troglorhopalurus, revalidation of Heteroctenus, and descriptions of two new genera and three new species (Buthidae: Rhopalurusinae). Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 415: 1 - 136.
Esposito, L. A., H. Y. Yamaguti, R. Pinto-da-Rocha, and L. Prendini. 2018. Plucking with the plectrum: phylogeny of the New World buthid scorpion subfamily Centruroidinae Kraus, 1955 (Scorpiones: Buthidae) reveals evolution of three pecten-sternite stridulation organs. Arthropod Systematics and Phylogeny 76: 87 - 122.
Fage, L. 1933. Les scorpions de l'Indochine francaise, leurs affinites, leurs distribution geographique. Annales de la Societe Entomologique de France 102: 25 - 34.
Fage, L. 1936. Nouvelle contribution a l'etude des scorpions de l'Indochine francaise. Bulletin de la Societe Entomologique de France 41: 179 - 181.
Fet, V. 2000. Family Scorpionidae Latreille, 1802. In V. Fet, W. D. Sissom, G. Lowe, and M. E. Braunwalder, Catalog of the scorpions of the World (1758 - 1998): 427 - 486. New York: New York Entomological Society.
Francke, O. F. 1985. Conspectus genericus scorpionorum 1758 - 1982 (Arachnida: Scorpiones). Occasional Papers of the Museum, Texas Tech University 98: 1 - 32.
Harrison, J. L. 1954. A family of the great black scorpion (Heterometrus longimanus). Malayan Nature Journal 9: 31 - 32.
Hemprich, F. G., and C. G. Ehrenberg. 1828. Zoologica II. Arachnoidea. Plate I: Buthus; plate II: Androctonus. In Symbolae physicae seu icones et descriptiones animalium evertebratorum sepositis insectis quae ex itinere per Africam borealem et Asiam occidentalem. Decas Prima, Plates IX et X. Berolini: Officina Academica.
Hemprich, F. G., and C. G. Ehrenberg. 1829. Vorlaufige Uebersicht der in Nord-Afrika und West-Asien einheimischen Scorpione und deren geographischen Verbreitung, nach den eigenen Beobachtungen. Verhandungen der Gesellschaft Naturforschende Freunde in Berlin 1: 348 - 362.
Herbst, J. F. W. 1800. Naturgeschichte der Skorpionen. In Natursystem der Ungeflugelten Insekten 4: 1 - 86. Berlin: Gottlieb August Lange.
Indra, T. J. 2001. Scorpion. In Fauna of Nilgiri Biosphere Reserve. Zoological Survey of India, Fauna of Conservation Area Series II: 55 - 58.
Javed, S. M. M., Z. A. Mirza, F. Tampal, and W. R. Lourenco. 2010 a. A new species of the genus Heterometrus Ehrenberg, 1828 (Scorpiones: Scorpionidae) from India with notes on its natural history. Boletin de la Sociedad Entomologica Aragonesa 47: 143 - 148.
Karsch, F. 1879 a. Skorpionologische Beitrage. Part I. Mitteilungen des Munchener Entomologischen Vereins 3: 6 - 22.
Kastner, A. 1941. 1. Ordnung der Arachnida: Scorpiones. In T. Krumbach (editor), Handbuch der Zoologie 3: 117 - 240. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter Verlag.
Koch, C. L. 1838. Die Arachniden. Nurnberg: C. H. Zeh'sche Buchhandlung 4 (6): 109 - 144, pl. 139 - 144 (figs. 319 - 339).
Kopstein, F. 1921. Die Skorpione des Indo-Australischen Archipels. Mit Grundlage der in hollandischen Sammlungen, vornahmlich des Rijks-Museums in Leiden, vorhandenen Arten. Zoologische Mededeelingen 6: 115 - 144.
Kovarik, F. 1998. Stiri [Scorpions]. Jihlava, Czech Republic: Madagaskar, 176 pp. [in Czech]
Kovarik, F. 2004. A review of the genus Heterometrus Ehrenberg, 1828, with descriptions of seven new species (Scorpiones, Scorpionidae). Euscorpius 15: 1 - 60.
Kovarik, F. 2009. Illustrated catalog of scorpions. Part 1. Introductory remarks; keys to families and genera; subfamily Scorpioninae with keys to Heterometrus and Pandinus species. Prague: Clarion Production. 170 pp.
Kraepelin, K. 1894. Revision der Skorpione. II. Scorpionidae und Bothriuridae. Beiheft zum Jahrbuch der Hamburgischen Wissenschaftlichen Anstalten 11: 1 - 248.
Kraepelin, K. 1899. Scorpiones und Pedipalpi. In F. Dahl (editor), Das Tierreich, 8 (Arachnoidea): 1 - 265. Herausgegeben von der Deutschen Zoologischen Gesellschaft. Berlin: R. Friedlander und Sohn Verlag.
Lankester, E. R. 1885. Notes on certain points of the anatomy of generic characters of scorpions. Transactions of the Zoological Society, London 11: 372 - 384.
Laurie, M. 1896 a. Notes on the anatomy of some scorpions, and its bearing on the classification of the order. Annals and Magazine of Natural History (Ser. 6) 17: 185 - 193.
Laurie, M. 1896 b. Further notes on the anatomy and development of scorpions, and their bearing on the classification of the order. Annals and Magazine of Natural History (Ser. 6) 17: 121 - 133.
Linnaeus, C. (C. von Linne). 1758. Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, loci. Ed. 10. 1: 1 - 821. [Scorpiones: pp. 624, 625.] Holmiae (Stockholm): Laurentii Salvii.
Lonnberg, E. 1897 a. Om skorpionernas och pedipalpernas geografiska utbredning. Entomologisk Tidskrift 18: 193 - 211.
Lourenco, W. R. 1989. Retablissement de la famille des Ischnuridae, distincte des Scorpionidae Pocock, 1893, a partir de la sous-famille des Ischnurinae, Pocock, 1893. Revue Arachnologique 8: 159 - 177.
Lourenco, W. R. 2000. Panbiogeographie, les familles des scorpions et leur repartition geographique. Biogeographica 76: 21 - 39.
Lourenco, W. R., and D. Huber. 2002. New addition to the scorpion fauna (Arachnida: Scorpiones) of Sri Lanka. Revue Suisse de Zoologie 109: 265 - 275.
Mahsberg, D. 1990. Brood care and family cohesion in the tropical scorpion Pandinus imperator (Koch) (Scorpiones: Scorpionidae). Acta Zoologica Fennica 190: 267 - 272.
Meise, W. 1932. Fehlender und extrem entwickelter Sexualdimorphismus im Formenkreis Heterometrus longimanus (Scorpion). Archiv fur Naturgeschichte, Neue Folge 1: 660 - 671.
Menzel, P., and F. D'Aluisio. 1998. Man eating bugs: the art and science of eating insects. Berkeley, CA: Material World Books / Ten Speed Press.
Mirza, Z. A., and R. Sanap. 2009. Notes on the reproductive biology of Heterometrus phipsoni Pocock, 1893 (Scorpiones, Scorpionidae). Journal of Threatened Taxa 1: 488 - 490.
Mirza, Z. A., D. Joshi, G. Desouza, and R. V. Sanap. 2012. Description of a new species of scorpion of the genus Heterometrus Ehrenberg, 1828 (Scorpiones, Scorpionidae) from the Western Ghats, India. Indian Journal of Arachnology 1: 1 - 8.
Nenilin, A. B., and V. Fet. 1992. Zoogeographical analysis of the world scorpion fauna (Arachnida: Scorpiones). Arthropoda Selecta 1: 3 - 31. [in Russian; extended English summary]
Pham, D. S., T. H. Tran, and W. R. Lourenco. 2017. Diversity and endemicity in the scorpion fauna of Vietnam. A preliminary synopsis. Comptes Rendus Biologies 340: 132 - 137.
Pliskova, J., F. Kovarik, O. Kosulic, and F. St'ahlavsky. 2016. Description of a new species of Heterometrus Ehrenberg, 1828 (Scorpiones: Scorpionidae) from Thailand with remarks about the utilization of cytogenetic data in taxonomy of the genus. Annales Zoologici (Warszawa) 66: 467 - 476.
Pocock, R. I. 1892. Descriptions of two new genera of scorpions, with notes upon some species of Palamnaeus. Annals and Magazine of Natural History (Ser. 6) 9: 38 - 49.
Pocock, R. I. 1893. Report upon a small collection of scorpions sent to the British Museum by Mr. Edgar Thurston, of the Government Central Museum, Madras. Journal of the Bombay Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society 7: 295 - 312.
Pocock, R. I. 1896 a. On a new generic distinction between the scorpions of the genera Scorpio and Palamnaeus. Annals and Magazine of Natural History (Ser. 6) 18: 75 - 77.
Pocock, R. I. 1897. Descriptions of some new species of scorpions from India. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 11: 102 - 117.
Pocock, R. I. 1899. Diagnoses of some new Indian Arachnida. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 12: 744 - 753.
Pocock, R. I. 1900 a. Arachnida. In W. T. Blandford (editor), The fauna of British India, including Ceylon and Burma. London: Taylor and Francis, 279 pp.
Polis, G. A., and W. R. Lourenco. 1986. Sociality among scorpions. In J. A. Barrientos (editor), Actas X Congreso de Aracnologia, Jaca (Espana), Septiembre 1986, 1: 111 - 115. Barcelona: Instituto Pirenaico de Ecologia (C. S. I. C.) Grupo de Aracnologia (Asoc. Esp. Entomol.)
Prendini, L. 2000 a. Phylogeny and classification of the superfamily Scorpionoidea Latreille 1802 (Chelicerata, Scorpiones): an exemplar approach. Cladistics 16: 1 - 78.
Prendini, L. 2001 b. Substratum specialization and speciation in southern African scorpions: the Effect Hypothesis revisited. In V. Fet and P. A. Selden (editors), Scorpions 2001: In memoriam Gary A. Polis: 113 - 138. Burnham Beeches, Bucks, U. K.: British Arachnological Society.
Prendini, L., T. M. Crowe, and W. C. Wheeler. 2003. Systematics and biogeography of the family Scorpionidae Latreille, with a discussion of phylogenetic methods. Invertebrate Systematics 17: 185 - 259.
Prendini, L., and W. C. Wheeler. 2005. Scorpion higher phylogeny and classification, taxonomic anarchy, and standards for peer review in online publishing. Cladistics 21: 446 - 494.
Rossi, A. 2016 a. Atlas of scorpions. Volume 1. (Scorpionidae: Pandininae: Pandinoides). Rivista Aracnologica Italiana 8 (Suppl.): 1 - 148.
Schultze, W. 1927. Biology of the large Philippine forest scorpion. Philippine Journal of Science 32: 375 - 388.
Shultz, J. W. 2007. Morphology of the prosomal endoskeleton of Scorpiones (Arachnida) and a new hypothesis for the evolution of cuticular cephalic endoskeletons in arthropods. Arthropod Structure and Development 36: 77 - 102.
Sissom, W. D. 1990. Systematics, biogeography and paleontology. In G. A. Polis (editor), The biology of scorpions: 64 - 160. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Soleglad, M. E., and V. Fet. 2003 a. High-level systematics and phylogeny of the extant scorpions (Scorpiones: Orthosterni). Euscorpius 11: ii + 1 - 175.
Tahir, H. M., and L. Prendini. 2014. Redescription of Heterometrus latimanus and confirmation of the genus Heterometrus (Scorpiones: Scorpionidae) in Pakistan. American Museum Novitates 3805: 1 - 23.
Takashima, H. 1945. [Scorpions of eastern Asia.] Acta Arachnologica 9: 68 - 106. [in Japanese]
Thorell, T. 1876 a. On the classification of scorpions. Annals and Magazine of Natural History (Ser. 4) 17: 1 - 15.
Tikader, B. K. 1973. Arachnida of the Deccan area. Bulletin of the Indian National Science Academy 45: 260 - 276.
Tikader, B. K., and D. B. Bastawade. 1983. Fauna of India, vol. 3. Scorpions (Scorpionida: Arachnida). Zoological Survey of India. Pune: Sangam Press. 671 pp.
Vachon, M. 1953. Quelques remarques sur les frontieres en biogeographie a propos de la Ligne Wallace et des scorpions indonesiens. Comptes Rendus des Seances de la Societe de Biogeographie 30: 6 - 12.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Heterometrus Ehrenberg, 1828
Prendini, Lorenzo & Loria, Stephanie F. 2020 |
Heterometrus (Heterometrus)
Bastawade, D. B. & M. Borkar 2008: 212 |
Bastawade, D. B. & P. M. Sureshan & C. Radhakrishnan 2004: 47 |
Prendini, L. & T. M. Crowe & W. C. Wheeler 2003: 222 |
Fet, V. 2000: 431 |
Prendini, L. 2000: 44 |
Francke, O. F. 1985: 8 |
Biswas, A. T. 1984: 320 |
Tikader, B. K. & D. B. Bastawade 1983: 519 |
Couzijn, H. W. C. 1981: 80 |
Couzijn, H. W. C. 1978: 330 |
Scorpio
Lonnberg, E. 1897: 197 |
Laurie, M. 1896: 193 |
Scorpio (Buthus)
Lankester, E. R. 1885: 379 |
Buthus (Heterometrus)
Karsch, F. 1879: 20 |
Caucon
Kraepelin, K. 1894: 34 |
Karsch, F. 1879: 14 |
Heterometrus: Karsch, 1879a: 20
Prendini, L. & T. M. Crowe & W. C. Wheeler 2003: 185 |
Bastawade, D. B. 2002: 95 |
Lourenco, W. R. & D. Huber 2002: 273 |
Indra, T. J. 2001: 55 |
Fet, V. 2000: 431 |
Lourenco, W. R. 2000: 25 |
Prendini, L. 2000: 2 |
Braunwalder, M. E. & V. Fet 1998: 31 |
Kovarik, F. 1998: 136 |
Nenilin, A. B. & V. Fet 1992: 19 |
Mahsberg, D. 1990: 269 |
Lourenco, W. R. 1989: 174 |
Francke, O. F. 1985: 8 |
Biswas, A. T. 1984: 320 |
Tikader, B. K. & D. B. Bastawade 1983: 2 |
Couzijn, H. W. C. 1981: 3 |
Couzijn, H. W. C. 1978: 327 |
Bucherl, W. 1964: 59 |
Kastner, A. 1941: 233 |
Fage, L. 1936: 179 |
Fage, L. 1933: 27 |
Kopstein, F. 1921: 128 |
Birula, A. A. 1917: 161 |
Birula, A. A. 1917: 59 |
Kraepelin, K. 1899: 106 |
Laurie, M. 1896: 193 |
Laurie, M. 1896: 128 |
Karsch, F. 1879: 20 |
Palamnaeus
Couzijn, H. W. C. 1981: 5 |
Tikader, B. K. 1973: 263 |
Pocock, R. I. 1900: 84 |
Laurie, M. 1896: 193 |
Laurie, M. 1896: 128 |
Pocock, R. I. 1896: 77 |
Pocock, R. I. 1892: 38 |
Thorell, T. 1876: 13 |
Buthus (Heterometros)
Hemprich, F. G. & C. G. Ehrenberg 1829: 351 |
Centrurus
Kraepelin, K. 1894: 34 |
Hemprich, F. G. & C. G. Ehrenberg 1829: 350 |