Scorpionidae, LATREILLE, 1802

Prendini, Lorenzo & Loria, Stephanie F., 2020, Systematic Revision Of The Asian Forest Scorpions (Heterometrinae Simon, 1879), Revised Suprageneric Classification Of Scorpionidae Latreille, 1802, And Revalidation Of Rugodentidae Bastawade Et Al., 2005, Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 2020 (442), pp. 1-480 : 19-22

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.1206/0003-0090.442.1.1

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/5E6CB374-FFE3-6D1C-FED3-6115FBB5DF08

treatment provided by

Felipe (2021-08-30 19:46:52, last updated by Plazi 2023-11-06 03:54:38)

scientific name

Scorpionidae
status

 

( Scorpionidae View in CoL : Heterometrinae Simon, 1879 , stat. nov.)

several species or represented only by type mate- DNA SEQUENCING: Two loci in the nuclear rial, which could not be dissected. genome, the 18S rDNA (18S) and 28S rDNA (28S),

Morphological terminology follows previous and three loci in the mitochondrial genome, 12S papers on Scorpionidae Latreille, 1802 , by the rDNA (12S), 16S rDNA (16S), and cytochrome c first author (e.g., Prendini, 2000b, 2001a; Pren- oxidase subunit I (COI) were Sanger dideoxy dini et al., 2003; Tahir and Prendini, 2014; Pren- sequenced using an ABI Prism 3730 XL DNA dini, 2016). The terminology applied in the new Sequencer (Perkin-Elmer, Melville, NY) at the trichobothrial interpretation of R. keralaensis, AMNH Sackler Institute of Comparative Genomproposed here, follows Vachon (1974). ics. Double-stranded sequences were edited and

A morphological data matrix, comprising 186 assembled into consensus sequences using morphological characters (appendices 1, 2) Sequencher ver. 5.4.6 (Gene Codes Corporation, scored for 132 terminals (including four out- Ann Arbor, MI), and deposited in GenBank groups) and incorporating characters from pre- (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank) (appenviously published matrices by Lamoral (1979), dix 3). Sequences of the 18S, 28S, and COI loci Couzijn (1981), Prendini (2000a), and Prendini were length invariant, respectively comprising 1761 et al. (2003), was prepared using WinClada ver. nucleotide base pairs (bp), 514 bp, and 1078 bp in 1.00.08 ( Nixon, 2002), and deposited in Morpho- all terminals, except Nebo hierichonticus (Simon, bank (http://morphobank.org/permalink/ 1872), which was 515 bp for 28S. Sequences of the P3719). Characters scored in the matrix included 12S locus varied from 328–335 bp with a mode of a variety of traits capturing the morphological 333 bp and the 16S locus from 481–487 bp with a diversity within Scorpionidae , most pertaining to mode of 481 bp. DNA sequences were unavailable the adult stage: total length, 1 (0.5%); chelicerae, for 10 species, for which samples could not be 4 (2%); carapace, 30 (16%); pedipalps, 61 obtained; these were represented in the analyses by (32.5%); coxosternum, 1 (0.5%); legs, 33 (18%); morphological characters only. genital operculum, 1 (0.5%); hemispermato- DNA SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT: DNA sequence phore, 3 (1.5%); pectines, 5 (3%); tergites, 5 (3%); alignment was performed with MAFFT ver. 7.429 sternites, 4 (2%); metasoma, 29 (16%); telson, 5 by auto-aligning with the “leavegappyregion” (3%); ecology and behavior, 3 (1.5%). The break- option selected ( Katoh et al., 2002; Katoh and down of morphological characters by character Standley, 2013). The aligned sequences were consystem is as follows: surface macrosculpture, 70 catenated to produce a matrix of 4188 bp. The con- (38%); macrosetae, 32 (17%); color patterns, 19 catenated alignment contained 925 variable sites (10%); shape and size, 29 (16%); surface topog- and 769 parsimony-informative sites. Considered raphy, 13 (7%); trichobothria, 9 (5%); genitalia, as a percentage of the alignment length of each 4 (2%); ungues, 3 (2%); sutures, 3 (2%); denti- locus, the numbers of variable positions and parsition, 1 (1%). Forty-seven (25%) multistate char- mony-informative sites were highest for 12S (variacters were treated as unordered/nonadditive able, 56%; parsimony informative, 48%), followed ( Fitch, 1971) to avoid a priori character state by 16S (49%, 40%), COI (40%, 36%), 28S (6%, 2%) transformations. and 18S (2%, 0.3%). As expected for a protein-cod-

ing gene, the third codon position of the COI was the most informative, containing 77% and 82% of the variable and parsimony-informative sites in the locus, followed by the first codon position, containing 19% and 15%, respectively.

PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS: The morphological character matrix and the concatenated dataset of aligned nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequences (hereafter, “the molecular dataset”) were analyzed simultaneously using maximum likelihood (ML), Bayesian inference (BI), and parsimony with equal weighting and implied weighting ( Goloboff, 1993), applying five values for the concavity constant, k, ranging from strong to mild (k = 1, 3, 10, 60, 100). The morphological and molecular datasets were also analyzed separately using parsimony with equal weighting and implied weighting with k = 1, 3, 10, 60, 100, and the molecular dataset was analyzed separately using ML and BI.

Parsimony analyses were performed using TNT ver. 1.1 ( Goloboff et al., 2003, 2008), with a script from Dimitrov et al. (2012, 2013) modified by Santibáñez-López et al. (2014a), which includes tree drifting, mixed sectorial search, and tree fusing for the tree search. Gaps were treated as missing data and uninformative characters deactivated. A jackknife analysis was performed to evaluate nodal support using another script modified from Dimitrov et al. (2012). A bootstrap analysis was performed for comparison with 1000 pseudoreplicates.

The ML analysis was conducted using RAxML- HPC ver. 8.2.12 on the CIPRES gateway (https:// www.phylo.org; Stamatakis, 2006, 2014). The dataset was partitioned by loci, a MULTIGAMMA model was implemented, and an ascertainment bias applied to the Mk model ( Lewis, 2001) for the morphological partition. A rapid bootstrap analysis with 1000 replicates ( Stamatakis, 2014) was used to search for the ML tree.

Twenty-four nucleotide substitution models were tested for each locus using JModeltest ver. 2.1.6 ( Guindon and Gascuel, 2003; Darriba et al., 2012) on the CIPRES gateway. Models were selected using the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and a gamma distribution assumed for the morphological dataset ( Lewis, 2001). Using these models, BI was conducted in MrBayes v. 3.2.7 on the CIPRES gateway ( Ronquist and Huelsenbeck, 2003) with unlinked parameters for all partitions. The analysis was terminated after 25 million generations when the standard deviation of the split frequencies was below 0.01. The preferred hypothesis for the phylogeny of Heterometrinae , with unambiguous morphological synapomorphies optimized, is presented in fig. 10. A more detailed explanation of the methods and results of the phylogenetic analyses is provided by Loria and Prendini (in press).

Couzijn, H. W. C. 1981. Revision of the genus Heterometrus. Zoologische Verhandelingen 184: 1 - 196.

Darriba, D., G. L. Taboada, R. Doallo, and D. Posada. 2012. jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nature Methods 9: 772.

DeGeer, C. (K. DeGeer). 1778. Memoires pour servir a l'histoire des insectes. Stockholm: Imprimerie Pierre Hesselberg 7: 1 - 950.

Dimitrov, D., et al. 2012. Tangled in a sparse spider web: single origin of orb weavers and their spinning work unravelled by denser taxonomic sampling. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, Biological Sciences 279: 1341 - 1350.

Dimitrov, D., J. J. Astrin, and B. A. Huber. 2013. Pholcid spider molecular systematics revisited, with new insights into the biogeography and the evolution of the group. Cladistics 29: 132 - 146.

Fitch, W. M. 1971. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Systematic Zoology 20: 406 - 416.

Goloboff, P. A. 1993. Estimating character weights during tree search. Cladistics 9: 83 - 91.

Goloboff, P. A., J. S. Farris, and K. C. Nixon. 2003. TNT: tree analysis using new technology. Computer software and documentation. Online resource (https: // cladistics. org / tnt).

Goloboff, P. A., J. S. Farris, and K. C. Nixon. 2008. TNT, a free program for phylogenetic analysis. Cladistics 24: 774 - 786.

Guindon, S., and O. Gascuel. 2003. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Systematic Biology 52: 696 - 704.

Katoh, K., K. Misawa, K. I. Kuma, and T. Miyata. 2002. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Research 30: 3059 - 3066.

Lamoral, B. H. 1979. The scorpions of Namibia (Arachnida: Scorpionida). Annals of the Natal Museum 23: 497 - 784.

Latreille, P. A. 1802 ( An X ). Histoire naturelle, generale et particuliere, des crustaces et des insectes. 3. (Ouvrage faisant suite a l'histoire naturelle generale et particuliere, composee par Leclerc de Buffon, et redigee par C. S. Sonnini.) Paris: F. Dufart.

Lewis, P. O. 2001. A likelihood approach to estimating phylogeny from discrete morphological character data. Systematic Biology 50: 913 - 925.

Nixon, K. C. 2002. WinClada, ver. 1.00. 08. Computer software and documentation. Online resource (http: // www. diversityoflife. org / winclada).

Pocock, R. I. 1897. Descriptions of some new species of scorpions from India. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 11: 102 - 117.

Prendini, L. 2000 b. Chelicerata (Scorpiones). In A. H. Kirk-Spriggs and E. Marais (editors), Daures - Biodiversity of the Brandberg Massif, Namibia. Cimbebasia Memoir 9: 109 - 120.

Prendini, L. 2000 a. Phylogeny and classification of the superfamily Scorpionoidea Latreille 1802 (Chelicerata, Scorpiones): an exemplar approach. Cladistics 16: 1 - 78.

Prendini, L. 2001 a. A review of synonyms and subspecies in the genus Opistophthalmus C. L. Koch (Scorpiones: Scorpionidae). African Entomology 9: 17 - 48.

Ronquist, F., and J. P. Huelsenbeck. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572 - 1574.

Santibanez-Lopez, C. E., O. F. Francke, and L. Prendini. 2014 a. Phylogeny of the North American scorpion genus Diplocentrus Peters, 1861 (Scorpiones: Diplocentridae) based on morphology, nuclear and mitochondrial DNA. Arthropod Systematics and Phylogeny 72: 257 - 279.

Simon, E. 1879. 3 e Ordre. Scorpiones. In Les arachnides de France. VII. Contenant les ordres des Chernetes, Scorpiones et Opiliones: 79 - 115. Paris: Roret.

Stamatakis, A. 2006. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22: 2688 - 2690.

Stamatakis, A. 2014. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30: 1312 - 1313.

Tahir, H. M., and L. Prendini. 2014. Redescription of Heterometrus latimanus and confirmation of the genus Heterometrus (Scorpiones: Scorpionidae) in Pakistan. American Museum Novitates 3805: 1 - 23.

Vachon, M. 1974 ( 1973 ). Etude des caracteres utilises pour classer les familles et les genres de scorpions (arachnides). 1. La trichobothriotaxie en arachnologie. Sigles trichobothriaux et types de trichobothriotaxie chez les scorpions. Bulletin du Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris 140: 857 - 958.