Curculio imperialis, (Forster)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1649/0010-065x(2002)056[0501:tnwgec]2.0.co;2 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/5F3F879C-FFE1-FFBC-FDA8-88A4FE8F7E03 |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Curculio imperialis |
status |
|
E. imperialis (Forster) View in CoL
( Figs. 1 View Fig , 7 View Figs )
Curculio imperialis Forster 1771:34 View in CoL ; Latreille 1804:158 ( Brachyrhinus View in CoL ); Germar 1817:341 ( Entimus View in CoL ).
Diagnosis. Frontal groove shallow; pronotum wider than long, with acute postocular lobes, and erect setae; scutellum protruding; elytra with angulate
and projecting humeri, interstriae lacking rounded tubercles, and abundant setae; scales elongateovate, only covering punctures, imbricate, absent on intestriae; elytra lacking white bands; and male legs with abundant setae. Total length (pronotum 1 elytra): 16–33 mm.
Distribution. Argentina, Brazil, and Paraguay.
Material Examined. BRAZIL. Bahia: Bahia , X1981, 1 ( BMNH) . Espirito Santo: Jetiba´ , II1964, 1 ( MACN) . Minas Gerais: Ipatinga , 1988, 1 ( MZFC) , X1993, E. J. Grossi coll., 5 ( MZFC) . Rio de Janeiro: Mendes , Hno. Eufrasio coll, 2 ( MACN) . Without more precise data. 4 (3 BMNH, 1 MACN) .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Curculio imperialis
Morrone, Juan J. 2002 |
Curculio imperialis
Germar 1817: 341 |
Latreille 1804: 158 |
Forster 1771: 34 |