Neohydatothrips elaeagni (Kudo)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4869.3.6 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8065E4DB-0272-4CFF-9CDB-33FB585A0D69 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4437220 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6027436E-9020-FFFC-FF45-74E9FBEDFCB1 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Neohydatothrips elaeagni (Kudo) |
status |
|
Neohydatothrips elaeagni (Kudo) View in CoL
( Figs 2, 3 View FIGURES 1–9 , 16 & 17 View FIGURES 10–17 )
Hydatothrips (Neohydatothrips) elaeagni Kudo, 1991: 535 View in CoL .
Neohydatothrips popli Han, 1991: 449 . [Synonymized by Wang, 2007.]
This species was described from Elaeagnus umbellata View in CoL [ Elaeagnaceae View in CoL ] based on the macropterous female in Hokkaido, Japan, and Han (1991) described N. popli , which was synonymized by Wang (2007), from Populus View in CoL sp. [ Salicaceae View in CoL ] based on both sexes. Thereafter, it has been collected from not only Elaeagnus View in CoL but also Salix [ Salicaceae View in CoL ] in Honshu. Moreover, micropterous females were recorded in Honshu ( Okajima 2000) but their character states have never been described so far. The micropterous and macropterous females of N. elaeagni View in CoL have almost same character states, but in the micropterous form the abdominal tergites II–VIII are almost uniformly covered with microtrichia, the discal setae are shorter than on the macropterous form, and all the tergites have posteromarginal microtrichia ( Fig. 17 View FIGURES 10–17 ). In the macropterous form the abdominal tergites have no microtrichia posteromedially and posteromarginal microtrichia are absent between S2 setae except on tergite VIII. Thus, the micropterous form is similar to species of Sericothrips View in CoL . However, it can be distinguished from Sericothrips View in CoL by the metanotum without microtrichia, abdominal tergite I without microtrichia medially and tergites II–VIII with S1 setae not similar in size and position. In the micropterous form of N. abnormis View in CoL , the fore wing is longer than the width of the mesothorax, but in N. elaeagni View in CoL the fore wing is lobe-like and much shorter than the width of thorax ( Figs 8 View FIGURES 1–9 & 16 View FIGURES 10–17 ). Sericothrips View in CoL looks like micropterous form of Neohydatothrips View in CoL (also see, Lima & Mound 2016b), but molecular data Buckman et al. (2013) suggested that Neohydatothrips View in CoL was sister group of Hydatothrips View in CoL rather than Sericothrips View in CoL , although only three species of these three genera were included in that analysis.
Specimens examined. JAPAN: Honshu: Iwate-ken, Morioka-shi, nr. Shijyushida-damu; 24 females (mic) on leaves of Salix integra [ Salicaceae ], 64 females (mic) on Elaeagnus sp. [ Elaeagnaceae ], 11.v.1999, T. Nonaka (TUA). Tokyo-to, The Imperial Palace Grounds, Fukiage-gyoen, 30 females (24 mac & 6 mic), 30.iv.1999, S. Okajima (TUA). Kanagawa-ken, Yokohama-shi, Kanazawa-shizen park, 62 micropterous females on Elaeagnus umbellata [ Elaeagnaceae ], 1.v.2005, M.Masumoto (TUA). Hiroshima-ken, Mihara-shi, Hongou-cho, 9 micropterous females on Elaeagnus umbellata [ Elaeagnaceae ], 4.v.2008, Y.Kojima (TUA).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Neohydatothrips elaeagni (Kudo)
Masumoto, Masami & Okajima, Shûji 2020 |
Hydatothrips (Neohydatothrips) elaeagni
Kudo, I. 1991: 535 |
Neohydatothrips popli
Han, Y. F. 1991: 449 |