Andrena (Micrandrena) saxonica Stöckhert, 1935

WOOD, T. J., 2024, Further revisions to the Palaearctic Andrena fauna (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae), Zootaxa 5483 (1), pp. 1-150 : 60-61

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:AF0272DB-5588-411D-9EAE-DED4785BF170

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13312508

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/612B87FC-AC62-4346-0B83-FAB38A760694

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Andrena (Micrandrena) saxonica Stöckhert, 1935
status

 

Andrena (Micrandrena) saxonica Stöckhert, 1935 View in CoL

Andrena saxonica Stöckhert, 1935: 82 View in CoL ♀ ♂ [ Germany, ZSM, not examined]

Andrena (Micrandrena) crypta Warncke, 1975b View in CoL (nec. Pterandrena crypta Viereck, 1904 View in CoL ): 96, ♀ ♂ [ Turkey, OÖLM, examined]

Andrena (Micrandrena) warnckei Gusenleitner & Schwarz, 2000: 112 View in CoL , nom. nov. for A. crypta Warncke, 1975 View in CoL syn. nov. ( Figures 39A–D View FIGURE 39 )

Remarks. Warncke (1975b) described A. crypta from eastern Turkey, though the name was unavailable and was replaced by Gusenleitner & Schwarz (2000). Warncke diagnosed A. crypta against A. minutula and surprisingly did not mention A. saxonica ; the two taxa are extremely similar morphologically, and the genital capsule of the holotype of A. crypta is identical to that of A. saxonica ( Figure 39D View FIGURE 39 ). The two taxa are therefore synonymised syn. nov. Wood & Monfared (2022) reported A. saxonica from eastern Turkey, this species thus occurring within the reported range of A. warnckei , but A. saxonica is also widespread in mountainous areas throughout Turkey, including the Taurus mountains in south-western Turkey.

Furthermore, Warncke (1975b: 53) described A. sillata Warncke, 1975 from Turkey, Greece, Ukraine (Donetsk), and southern European Russia (Smolensk), and diagnosed it against A. saxonica . The locus typicus is the Taurus mountains in south-western Turkey ( Figures 40A View FIGURE 40 ; 41A View FIGURE 41 ), and hence the inclusion of material from Eastern Europe in the type series is perplexing. A single female paratype from Ukraine is available in the OÖLM collection ( Figures 41B; D; F; H View FIGURE 41 ), and in direct comparison is larger and presents terga that are more strongly shagreened than typical A. sillata (compare Figures 41G–H View FIGURE 41 ). No males were reported by Warncke from the Eastern European populations. Comparison of the genital capsule of typical A. sillata ( Figure 40D View FIGURE 40 ) and A. saxonica ( Figure 39D View FIGURE 39 ) shows clear differences in the shape of the gonocoxal teeth (narrow and pointed in A. sillata , broad and truncate in A. saxonica ) and penis valves (relatively narrow in A. sillata , strongly basally broadened and triangular in A. saxonica ). One newly examined male specimen from Crimea shows typical A. saxonica genitalia.

It was possible to generate sequences ( Figure 37 View FIGURE 37 ) of A. sillata ( Lebanon) and A. saxonica ( Spain and Greece). The sequence of A. sillata from Lebanon was separated from Spanish and Greek A. saxonica by 6.67% (range 6.28–7.15%). Andrena saxonica itself showed average intraspecific variation of 2.49% (range 0.00–4.10%), with Spanish and Greek sequences forming clades with 89 and 98 bootstrap support, respectively. The division between the Spanish and Greek sequences is considered to represent separation by distance, since A. saxonica is found across most of Central Europe, and therefore Spanish and Greek specimens represent the east and west extremes of the European population. The same can be seen to a slightly lesser extent in A. simontornyella Noskiewicz, 1939 , with average intraspecific variation of 1.90 (range 0.15–3.81%) between specimens from Spain, France, and southern Greece. The overall A. saxonica clade received bootstrap support of 90, and the inclusion of additional sequences from Central Europe (not currently available) is highly likely to reduce this average intraspecific variation further. In conclusion, Whilst A. sillata and A. saxonica are clearly distinct species, material from Eastern Europe and eastern Turkey is considered to belong to A. saxonica . Andrena sillata is therefore considered to have a range restricted to Greece (Rhodes), south-western Turkey, Lebanon *, Syria *, Jordan *, and Israel.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hymenoptera

Family

Andrenidae

Genus

Andrena

Loc

Andrena (Micrandrena) saxonica Stöckhert, 1935

WOOD, T. J. 2024
2024
Loc

Andrena saxonica Stöckhert, 1935: 82

Stockhert, E. 1935: 82
1935
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF