Lampadena gracilis (Schubert, 1912)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2017.322 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3848327 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/61599612-9474-CE24-7A74-A070FB06957A |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Lampadena gracilis (Schubert, 1912) |
status |
|
Lampadena gracilis (Schubert, 1912)
The otoliths of L. gracilis are very rare at the investigated localities ( Fig. 5 View Fig N–O). They are characterised by a more ventrally located sulcus, leaving a dorsal area that is wider than the ventral one, and by a prominent postero-dorsal angle. Their rostrum is directed straight anteriorly, and not upward, like in Lampadena dea Fraser-Brunner, 1949 (e.g., Fig. 5K View Fig ). Recently, based only on otoliths, Schwarzhans (2013b: p. 160) erected a new fossil genus Paralampadena including three fossil species from West Africa as well as L. gracilis . However, following the diagnostic features described for Paralampadena , each criterion is covered by the high variability of extant Lampadena otoliths. For example, the statement that Paralampadena does not exhibit ventral denticles, a postero-dorsal depression, which can be rather deep and angular, thus reducing the posterior rim of the otolith to some extent, and the comparatively long cauda, can all be observed in the otoliths of Recent Lampadena anomala Parr, 1928 , L. dea , L. notialis Nafpaktitis & Paxton, 1968 , and L. speculigera Goode & Bean, 1896 (see Girone & Nolf 2002 for the otolith iconography of all the Recent Lampadena species). Consequently, we retain that there is insufficient evidence for separating L. gracilis from the genus Lampadena .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |