Opius capeki Fischer, 1963
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.37520/aemnp.2022.027 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:FA9F151F-C5FE-4048-9A82-8B21726D8D3E |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10560355 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/616187B8-6B14-FFC0-5658-430CFD8973B5 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Opius capeki Fischer, 1963 |
status |
|
Opius capeki Fischer, 1963 View in CoL
Opius capeki Fischer, 1963: 286 View in CoL , Figs 4–7 View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig (original description).
The holotype and allotype are deposited in NMPC (ex. coll. M. Čapek):
HOLOTYPE (♀): ‘ Muráň / 25.vi.1957 / Lgt. M. Čapek [hw] // Opius [p] / Capeki ♀ / n.sp. [hw, blue ink] / det. Fischer // Holotype [p, red label] // Präparat! [hw, pencil] // Mus. Nat.Pragae / Inv. [p] 25.786 [hw, blue ink, orange label]’ ( Fig. 15 View Fig ). (Fore wing and all legs are missing on the non-glued side of specimen.)
ALLOTYPE (♂): ‘ Muráň / 25.vi.1957 / Lgt. M. Čapek [hw] // Opius [p] / Capeki ♂ / n.sp. [hw, blue ink] / det. Fischer // Allotype [p, red label] // Mus. Nat. Pragae / Inv. [p] 25.787 [hw, blue ink, orange label]’ ( Fig. 16 View Fig ).
Current status. Valid species, currently as Phaedrotoma capeki ( Fischer, 1963) (see VAN ACHTERBERG 2009 and YU et al. 2016).
Distribution. Estonia, Slovakia (see YU et al. 2016).
Remark. The slide preparation that is listed on the label under the female holotype is missing.
NMPC |
Czech Republic, Prague, National Museum (Natural History) |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Opius capeki Fischer, 1963
Hovorka, Tomáš & Macek, Jan 2022 |
Opius capeki
FISCHER M. 1963: 286 |