Haematopota montisdraconis Usher, 1965: 58 fig. 10a-d.
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.62.76103 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9E50B831-2AA7-4225-81EB-6C4AD5668780 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/61BF0A6B-9F50-569F-B16F-9456B3FC115A |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Haematopota montisdraconis Usher, 1965: 58 fig. 10a-d. |
status |
|
Haematopota montisdraconis Usher, 1965: 58 fig. 10a-d.
Holotype.
South Africa • ♀; Eastern Cape, Naude’s Nek; NMSA-Dip 052789; type number 1896. Figs 5A-D & I View Figure 5 -IV.
Current status.
Haematopota montisdraconis Usher, 1965; original combination.
Remarks.
The holotype label does not contain a date or collector. In the publication, four paratypes are listed as having the same collecting information. Two of the paratypes have labels stating "Naudes Nek [sic], Barkly East District, Eastern Cape Province, 2350 - 2525 m, 19 Jan 1963// Collectors: B & P Stuckenberg". It is therefore assumed that this information is the same for the holotype. The holotype and paratypes all have type labels with the name " Haematopota dracomontana , Usher" which is assumed to be the name Usher assigned before she published it as Haematopota montisdraconis . The four paratypes - two male and two female - listed in the publication are in the KwaZulu-Natal Museum collection. The specimen is in poor condition. The head lacks both antennae and is glued to a card pinned below the specimen. A piece of one of the wings is also glued to the card and the remainder of the wing is missing. The two male paratypes are in good condition ( NMSA-DIP 136319, NMSA-DIP 052768) - one is missing the ends of its flagellum ( NMSA-DIP 052768). The head of one of the female paratypes is glued to a card pinned below the specimen ( NMSA-DIP 136321) and the other specimen is in good condition ( NMSA-DIP 136320).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |