Chamaecrista absus (L.) H.S. Irwin & Barneby, 1990
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.291971 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4378752 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/62FC5488-82E1-B1A9-E80E-AC2D4946E7E5 |
treatment provided by |
Admin |
scientific name |
Chamaecrista absus (L.) H.S. Irwin & Barneby |
status |
|
Cassia absus Linnaeus View in CoL , Species Plantarum 1: 376. 1753 View Cited Treatment .
"Habitat in India, Aegypto." RCN: 2958.
Lectotype (de Wit in Webbia 11: 280. 1956): Herb. Linn. No. 528.4 ( LINN) .
Current name: Chamaecrista absus (L.) H.S. Irwin & Barneby View in CoL ( Fabaceae : Caesalpinioideae ).
Note: Fawcett & Rendle (Fl. Jamaica 4: 111. 1920) indicated that the type was in Herb. Hermann ( BM) but as the elements preserved there include both specimens and drawings, this is not an effective type choice. De Wit appears to have been the next to indicate a type, and chose material in LINN (as “holotype”). Although he was followed by some authors (e.g. Symon in Trans. Roy. Soc. S. Australia 90: 131. 1966), Ali (in Nasir & Ali, Fl. W. Pakistan 54: 20. 1973) indicated a Hermann collection (BM) as lectotype, and was followed by many authors. These include Irwin & Barneby (in Mem. New York Bot. Gard. 30: 281. 1978) who rejected de Wit’s choice on the grounds that Linnaeus’ account was based primarily on his Flora Zeylanica (1747) treatment. However, the collection in LINN does form part of the original material for the name, and de Wit’s choice has priority.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Chamaecrista absus (L.) H.S. Irwin & Barneby
Jarvis, Charlie 2007 |