Minirhaphidophora, Gorochov, 2002
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4853.2.5 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D1AC7BC4-92B4-4B3D-9E0F-2BD6FE250139 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4501882 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/63168793-FFF1-FFD6-FF6A-D8E0FA4FB647 |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Minirhaphidophora |
| status |
|
Key to subgenera and species of Minirhaphidophora View in CoL
1. Male............................................................................................... 2
- Female............................................................................................. 3
2. Eight abdominal tergite with a pair of angular projections posteriorly; the posteromedian lobe of the ninth abdominal tergite appears with a small median hook on the dorsal surface; the median part of the tenth abdominal tergite is reduced (partly membranous and without specializations); epiproct with a rather wide apical part and a bilobate apex [subgenus Minirhaphidophora View in CoL s. str.]...................................................................................... M. berezini View in CoL
- Eight abdominal tergite with one posteromedian angular projection ( Figs 35, 36 View FIGURES 32–38 ); posteromedian lobe of the ninth abdominal tergite is present without any hooks ( Figs 34, 35 View FIGURES 32–38 ); median part of the tenth abdominal tergite is developed and has a pair of finger-like dorsal tubercles near each other ( Figs 34–36 View FIGURES 32–38 ); epiproct with a rather narrow apical part and bifurcate apex ( Figs 34–37 View FIGURES 32–38 ) [subgenus Condylophora View in CoL subgen. nov.]................................................. M. ophioglossa View in CoL sp. nov.
3. Genital plate with obtusely angular (almost rounded) apex.......................................... M. (M.) minima View in CoL
- Genital plate with distinct posteromedian spine ( Fig. 40 View FIGURES 39–41 )...................................................... 4
4. Body appears comparatively large (length of hind femur about 12.7 mm).............................. M. (?) ocellata View in CoL
- Body appears comparatively small (length of hind femur 7.9–9.5 mm)........................................... 5
5. Lateral ocelli appears rather large (almost as long as the space between the lateral ocellus and apex of the rostral tubercle; Fig. 33 View FIGURES 32–38 ). Tenth abdominal tergite is present with a pair of small posterior lobules located near each other ( Fig. 39 View FIGURES 39–41 ).......................................................................................... M. (C.) ophioglossa View in CoL sp. nov.
- Lateral ocelli appears to be much smaller (significantly shorter than the space between the lateral ocellus and the apex of the rostral tubercle). Tenth abdominal tergite without lobules............................................ M. (?) kerinci View in CoL
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.