Xanthopygus Kraatz, 1857 sensu Chatzimanolis 2021
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5099.2.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9889BA66-0E9D-424B-BD4D-DE835993CD0F |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6309124 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6408AC19-4D37-F877-FF2C-5CD6C80E5854 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Xanthopygus Kraatz, 1857 sensu Chatzimanolis 2021 |
status |
|
Xanthopygus Kraatz, 1857 sensu Chatzimanolis 2021 View in CoL
( Figs. 1–55 View FIGURES 1–6 View FIGURES 11–13 View FIGURE 14 View FIGURES 15–18 View FIGURES 19–21 View FIGURE 22 View FIGURES 23–26 View FIGURES 27–29 View FIGURES 30–33 View FIGURES 34–36 View FIGURES 37–39 View FIGURES 40–43 View FIGURES 44–46 View FIGURES 47–50 View FIGURES 51–53 View FIGURE 54 View FIGURE 55 )
Xanthopygus Kraatz, 1857: 539 View in CoL .
Type species: Staphylinus xanthopygus Nordmann, 1837 View in CoL , fixed by absolute tautonymy ( Herman 2001).
Lampropygus Sharp. 1884: 346 View in CoL . Synonym of Xanthopygus View in CoL ; Blackwelder 1943. Type species: Staphylinus xanthopygus Nordmann, 1837 View in CoL , fixed by subsequent designation by Lucas 1920: 361.
Heteropygus Bernhauer, 1906: 195 . Synonym of Xanthopygus View in CoL ; Blackwelder 1943. Types species: Blackwelder (1943) listed giganteus as the type of Heteropygus as being monotypic; however, Bernhauer (1906) included two species ( giganteus and oliveirae View in CoL ) in his definition of Heteropygus , therefore the statement by Blackwelder is invalid. Lampropygus giganteus Bernhauer is here designated as the type species of Heteropygus .
Type species: Staphylinus xanthopygus Nordmann, 1837 View in CoL , fixed by absolute tautonymy ( Herman 2001).
Species included: cognatus View in CoL , luctuosus View in CoL , major View in CoL , max View in CoL , oliveirae View in CoL , pexus View in CoL and xanthopygus View in CoL .
Diagnosis: Modified from Chatzimanolis (2021). Xanthopygus can be distinguished from all other genera in Xanthopygina based on the combination of the following characteristics: head wider than long and rectangular in shape; head wider than pronotum; antennomeres 7–10 transverse; left mandible with two teeth separated by deep emargination; labial palpomere 3 parallel-sided, not securiform; eye size small (less than 2/5 length of head); superior marginal line of pronotal hypomeron not continuing to anterior margin; superior and inferior marginal line of pronotal hypomeron produce anterolateral angles not parallel to one other; postcoxal process present; elytra coloration black (except with blue metallic overtones in Xa. xanthopygus ); dorsal 1/3 of metepisterstum without punctures throughout its length; with more than four spines on the posterior surface of metacoxae (except in X. xanthopygus , four); tergites 3–5 with arch-like carina; and sternite 7 in males with emargination at posterior margin. For a list of characters that distinguish Xanthopygus from Photinopygus , see Chatzimanolis (2021).
Description. Habitus as in Figs. 7, 15, 23, 30, 37, 40, 47. Body medium-sized to large, forebody 6.0– 17.3 mm, without long bristle-like setae. Coloration dark brown to black except posterior abdominal segments orange. Head shape rectangular; head length in comparison to pronotum shorter (except X. luctuosus ). Eye size small, less than 2/5 length of head. Postclypeus, in comparison to frons, not deflexed; anterior margin more or less straight. Middle of epicranium impunctate but with microsculpture. Postmandibular ridge laterally; with deep punctures demarcating raised postmandibular ridge present. Gular sutures not joined before neck, extended close to each other at base of head capsule. Posterior margin of head more or less at same level with neck border. Nuchal ridge incomplete dorsally. Neck disc without or with sparse punctures.
Antennae (Figs. 10, 18, 26, 33, 39, 43, 50) with relative width of antennomere 1 equal or slightly wider than 2. Third antennomere 2.5 times as long as wide or less; antennomere 4 with tomentose pubescence absent ( X. luctuosus , X. oliveirae ) or present (other species); antennomeres 4–10 cylindrical in shape; antennomeres 5–10 without club; antennomere 5 subquadrate; antennomeres 7–10 symmetrical, transverse; antennomere 6 with curved, distinctly longer and thicker subapical setae than other macrosetae, forming a circlet; antennomere 11 in males subequal to 10.
Mouthparts with labrum having broadly U-shaped emargination, lobes strongly separated. Mandibles ( Figs. 1–2 View FIGURES 1–6 ) with relative length typical (i.e., closed mandible not extending beyond lateral margin of head); without asymmetrical torsion. Mandibles in dorsal view curved from apical half in most species except more or less straight (except tip) in X. luctuosus and X. oliveirae ; in lateral aspect straight; left mandible with two teeth separated by deep emargination; right mandible with one tooth. Maxilla ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1–6 ) with galea much shorter than palpus; maxillary palpus with palpomere 3 shorter than 2; palpomere 4 longer than 3; palpomere 4 not dilated (parallel-sided). Labial palpus ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 1–6 ) with palpomere 3 widest before apex; palpomere 3 without long dense setae on entire lateral sides. Ligula small, entire. Mentum with alpha seta present; hypostomal cavity present; moderately delimited.
Pronotum with shape of lateral margins in dorsal view posteriad of midpoint straight to sinuate; anterior angles in dorsal view not strongly acuminate and produced laterad. Pronotum near anterolateral angles without raised impunctate spots; anterolateral corners with punctation; disc of pronotum with punctation beyond midlength; punctation varies but with transverse lines of microsculpture; without coarse punctures impressed in flange at posterior angle of pronotum. Hypomeron with superior marginal line not continuous to anterior margin; superior marginal line without distinct deflection under anterior angles in ventral view; inferior marginal line of hypomeron continued as separate entity beyond anterior pronotal angles and curving around them. Superior and inferior marginal lines produce anterolateral angles not parallel to one other (see figs. 2A–B in Chatzimanolis 2021). Postcoxal process present. Basisternum ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 1–6 ) slightly longer than furcasternum; basisternum with pair of macrosetae, situated far from anterior margin of prosternum.
Elytra well developed, longer than pronotum and together, not strongly transverse; hind wings present; hind wing venation with veins CuA and MP4 fused in one vein. Elytra setae not reduced, easily seen at low magnification; without patches of white setae. Elytra without contiguous polygon-shaped meshed microsculpture. Mesoscutelum with dense cluster of punctures medially. Mesoventrite ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 1–6 ) with apex of intercoxal process being broad and either rounded or pointed. Metepisternum with dorsal 1/3 without punctures throughout its length.
Legs 5-5-5; profemora without lateroventral apical spines; protarsi with modified pale (adhesive) setae ventrally; protarsi with tarsomeres 1–4 dorsoventrally flattened. Mesocoxae strongly separated, intercoxal area on approximately same plane as both meso and metaventrital processes. Metacoxae without coxal shield; with more than four spines on posterior surface (except X. xanthopygus , less than four). Metatibia without thick and long apical spurs but smaller spurs present; with spines. Meso/metatarsi with symmetrically lobed tarsomeres 1–4; tarsomeres 3–5 of metatarsi with chaetotaxy developed only at margins of dorsal surface; dorsal surface of tarsomeres glabrous along midline. Pretarsal claws with empodial setae.
Abdomen with lateral sides in dorsal view more or less parallel-sided; with protergal glands having well-developed acetabula. Anterior basal transverse carina on tergites 3 and 4 without pair of accessory ridges; tergite 3 without posterior basal transverse carina; tergites 3–5 with curved carina (arch-like) on disc; tergite 5 without pair of accessory ridges on anterior basal transverse carina; center of tergite 5 with punctation; posterior half of tergite 5 in lateral view not appearing bulging. Sternite 3 with straight to arcuate basal transverse carina medially; basal transverse carina laterally not sinuate. Sternite 4 without basal transverse carina medially. Sternite 5 with dense, meshed microsculpture anterolaterally, appearing different in texture to posterior portion. Males with secondary sexual structures (medial emargination) present on sternites 7 and 8; without porose structure (except X. xanthopygus ). Aedeagus with long median lobe and single paramere; paramere with sensory peg setae; median lobe with single subapical tooth (except in X. cognatus and X. xanthopygus , no tooth), without apical tooth, carina or paired apex. Spermatheca not sclerotized.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Xanthopygus Kraatz, 1857 sensu Chatzimanolis 2021
Chatzimanolis, Stylianos 2022 |
Staphylinus xanthopygus
Lucas, R. 1920: 361 |
Heteropygus
Bernhauer, M. 1906: 195 |
Xanthopygus
Kraatz, G. 1857: 539 |