Manulea (Manulea) diaforetica, Volynkin & Saldaitis & Huang, 2022

Volynkin, Anton V., Saldaitis, Aidas & Huang, Si-Yao, 2022, Taxonomic review of Manulea (M.) tienmushanica (Daniel), comb. nov., and its allies with descriptions of two new species from mainland China (Lepidoptera Erebidae: Arctiinae), Zootaxa 5182 (4), pp. 389-398 : 394-397

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5182.4.5

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7278CE0C-28B2-4C3C-A7C6-27FFA7EE428C

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7056582

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/65633A03-FF98-703D-D4A2-F9E4BB3107E7

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Manulea (Manulea) diaforetica
status

sp. nov.

Manulea (Manulea) diaforetica sp. n.

( Figs 7, 8 View FIGURES 1–8 , 14 View FIGURES 12–14 , 16 View FIGURES 15–16 )

Type material. Holotype ( Figs 7 View FIGURES 1–8 , 14 View FIGURES 12–14 ); male, “ China, Yunnan | 5 km N Hutiaoxia | 220 km N Dali | 2200 m, 23– 27.IV.1998 | ex coll. Dr. R. Brechlin” / “Slide | ZSM Arct. | 2021- 195♂ | A. Volynkin” ( MWM / ZSM).

Paratypes. MAINLAND CHINA: 16 males, 3 females with same data as in holotype, ZSM Arct. 2021-194 (male), ZSM Arct. 2021-196 (female) (prepared by Volynkin) ( MWM / ZSM); 1 female, N Yunnan, North from Yongseng, 2050m, N26°31.14' E100°44.52', 11. V.2018, Butvila & Saldaitis leg., gen. prep. No.: AV6780 (prepared by Volynkin) ( AFM). GoogleMaps

Diagnosis. The forewing length is 15.0– 15.5 mm in males and 15.0 mm in females. Manulea diaforetica sp. n. ( Figs 7, 8 View FIGURES 1–8 ) is superficially reminiscent of M. tienmushanica ( Figs 1–3 View FIGURES 1–8 ) but differs in the larger size, the forewing with a more elongate apex and the more oblique tornus, and the smaller black costal spot. Additionally, the male of the new species is distinguished from M. tienmushanica by the presence of a cluster of androconial scales in the cell proximally, and the intense ochreous-yellow suffusion on the hindwing medially-anteriorly. The male genital capsule of M. diaforetica sp. n. ( Fig. 14 View FIGURES 12–14 ) is most similar to M. salweena sp. n. ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 12–14 ) but differs in the narrower uncus, the longer valva (in proportion to the tegumen-uncus complex length), and the more elongate and upcurved distal saccular process. The phallus of the new species is longer than in M. salweena sp. n. and evenly tubular whereas it is distally dilated in the congener. The vesica of M. diaforetica sp. n. ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 12–14 ) differs clearly from other known relatives ( Figs 9–13 View FIGURES 9–11 View FIGURES 12–14 ) in the lack of the subbasal cornutus, and the presence of a robust, thorn-like terminal cornutus. The vesica configuration of the new species is fundamentally different from other species in the group and is characterised by the broad and downcurved subbasal diverticulum, and the main chamber having three short conical diverticula lacking clusters of spinules. The detailed comparison of the female genitalia of M. diaforetica sp. n. ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 15–16 ) with M. salweena sp. n. ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 15–16 ) is provided above in the diagnosis of the latter species.

Distribution. Known only from the type locality in northern Yunnan Province of mainland China.

Etymology. The specific epithet originates from the Greek ‘διαφορετικός’ meaning ‘different’ and refers to the phallus and vesica structures significantly different from other species in the species group. The name is a noun in apposition.

N

Nanjing University

R

Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile

ZSM

Bavarian State Collection of Zoology

A

Harvard University - Arnold Arboretum

V

Royal British Columbia Museum - Herbarium

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF