Holostaspis oophila (Wasmann)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4613.1.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B5AA3472-0597-458F-BFD7-019448C35FE5 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/661A87C6-FF9C-FFF7-FF18-60ECFDF58809 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Holostaspis oophila (Wasmann) |
status |
|
Figures 50–55 View FIGURES 50–55 .
Laelaps oophilus Wasmann, 1897 , 172.
Hypoaspis oophilus .— Oudemans, 1902: 24; 1903: 130.
Laelaps (Oolaelaps) oophilus .— Berlese, 1904: 428.
Oolaelaps oophilus .— Oudemans, 1914: 68.
Hypoaspis (Holostaspis) oophila .— Evans & Till, 1966: 206; Karg, 1979: 97; 1982: 247; 1993: 157.
Holostaspis oophila .— Bregetova, 1977: 549; Keum et. al., 2017: 490; Babaeian et al., 2019.
Specimens examined. Three females, RUSSIA, Tyumen Province, vicinity of Uspenka, 57°04’N, 65°04’E, 21 May 2018, O. Joharchi coll., in the nest of Formica fusca View in CoL L. ( Hymenoptera View in CoL : Formicidae View in CoL ) in the rotting stems of trees and stumps.
Notes. Holostaspis oophila was described as Laelaps oophilus , which had been collected associated with eggs of Formica sanguinea Latreille and Formica rufibarbis F. ( Wasmann, 1897). The description of this species is brief and lacks many important details, but additional morphological characters that complement the description of this species are presented by Evans & Till (1966). Vitzthum (1929) synonymised H. isotricha and H. oophila , but did not provide any explanation for that decision, and did not give details of the specimens he examined. We followed Evans & Till (1966), and consider them as separate species. Our specimens agree completely with Evans & Till (1966, Fig. 38 View FIGURES 38–42 ) and Babaeian et al. (2019, Figs 57 View FIGURES 56–61 –66). This species is widely distributed in Europe and Russia in ants’ nests and it is now recorded for the first time in Western Siberia, from the same host. The species is easily recognised by the very short setae of the podonotal area of the dorsal shield, setae of opisthonotal increasing in length from anterior to posterior, almost all opisthonotal area setae with 2–4 minute barbs distally ( Fig. 50 View FIGURES 50–55 ), epistome smooth ( Fig. 54 View FIGURES 50–55 ), anal shield with anterolateral extension, post-anal seta long and thick ( Figs 51, 52 View FIGURES 50–55 ), ad1 on femur I-IV well thickened and fixed digit of chelicera reduced with a small tooth, movable digit with a small sub-terminal which followed by the terminal hook ( Fig. 55 View FIGURES 50–55 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Holostaspis oophila (Wasmann)
Joharchi, Omid, Tolstikov, Andrei V., Khaustov, Alexander A., Khaustov, Vladimir A. & Sarcheshmeh, Mohammadhassan Abbasi 2019 |
Holostaspis oophila
Bregetova, N. G. 1977: 549 |
Hypoaspis (Holostaspis) oophila
Karg, W. 1979: 97 |
Evans, G. O. & Till, W. M. 1966: 206 |
Oolaelaps oophilus
Oudemans, A. C. 1914: 68 |
Laelaps (Oolaelaps) oophilus
Berlese, A. 1904: 428 |
Hypoaspis oophilus
Oudemans, A. C. 1902: 24 |