Holostaspis oophila (Wasmann)

Joharchi, Omid, Tolstikov, Andrei V., Khaustov, Alexander A., Khaustov, Vladimir A. & Sarcheshmeh, Mohammadhassan Abbasi, 2019, Review of some mites (Acari: Laelapidae) associated with ants and bumblebees in Western Siberia, Russia, Zootaxa 4613 (1), pp. 71-92 : 85

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4613.1.3

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B5AA3472-0597-458F-BFD7-019448C35FE5

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/661A87C6-FF9C-FFF7-FF18-60ECFDF58809

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Holostaspis oophila (Wasmann)
status

 

Holostaspis oophila (Wasmann)

Figures 50–55 View FIGURES 50–55 .

Laelaps oophilus Wasmann, 1897 , 172.

Hypoaspis oophilus .— Oudemans, 1902: 24; 1903: 130.

Laelaps (Oolaelaps) oophilus .— Berlese, 1904: 428.

Oolaelaps oophilus .— Oudemans, 1914: 68.

Hypoaspis (Holostaspis) oophila .— Evans & Till, 1966: 206; Karg, 1979: 97; 1982: 247; 1993: 157.

Holostaspis oophila .— Bregetova, 1977: 549; Keum et. al., 2017: 490; Babaeian et al., 2019.

Specimens examined. Three females, RUSSIA, Tyumen Province, vicinity of Uspenka, 57°04’N, 65°04’E, 21 May 2018, O. Joharchi coll., in the nest of Formica fusca View in CoL L. ( Hymenoptera View in CoL : Formicidae View in CoL ) in the rotting stems of trees and stumps.

Notes. Holostaspis oophila was described as Laelaps oophilus , which had been collected associated with eggs of Formica sanguinea Latreille and Formica rufibarbis F. ( Wasmann, 1897). The description of this species is brief and lacks many important details, but additional morphological characters that complement the description of this species are presented by Evans & Till (1966). Vitzthum (1929) synonymised H. isotricha and H. oophila , but did not provide any explanation for that decision, and did not give details of the specimens he examined. We followed Evans & Till (1966), and consider them as separate species. Our specimens agree completely with Evans & Till (1966, Fig. 38 View FIGURES 38–42 ) and Babaeian et al. (2019, Figs 57 View FIGURES 56–61 –66). This species is widely distributed in Europe and Russia in ants’ nests and it is now recorded for the first time in Western Siberia, from the same host. The species is easily recognised by the very short setae of the podonotal area of the dorsal shield, setae of opisthonotal increasing in length from anterior to posterior, almost all opisthonotal area setae with 2–4 minute barbs distally ( Fig. 50 View FIGURES 50–55 ), epistome smooth ( Fig. 54 View FIGURES 50–55 ), anal shield with anterolateral extension, post-anal seta long and thick ( Figs 51, 52 View FIGURES 50–55 ), ad1 on femur I-IV well thickened and fixed digit of chelicera reduced with a small tooth, movable digit with a small sub-terminal which followed by the terminal hook ( Fig. 55 View FIGURES 50–55 ).

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Mesostigmata

Family

Laelapidae

Genus

Holostaspis

Loc

Holostaspis oophila (Wasmann)

Joharchi, Omid, Tolstikov, Andrei V., Khaustov, Alexander A., Khaustov, Vladimir A. & Sarcheshmeh, Mohammadhassan Abbasi 2019
2019
Loc

Holostaspis oophila

Bregetova, N. G. 1977: 549
1977
Loc

Hypoaspis (Holostaspis) oophila

Karg, W. 1979: 97
Evans, G. O. & Till, W. M. 1966: 206
1966
Loc

Oolaelaps oophilus

Oudemans, A. C. 1914: 68
1914
Loc

Laelaps (Oolaelaps) oophilus

Berlese, A. 1904: 428
1904
Loc

Hypoaspis oophilus

Oudemans, A. C. 1902: 24
1902
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF