Pelophila rudis (LeConte, 1863)
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.245.3416 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:68FE3835-2401-43A7-96E2-CF26532F7A60 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6733B5F9-969A-BB9E-2E09-CB4EEA1477EA |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Pelophila rudis (LeConte, 1863) |
status |
|
Pelophila rudis (LeConte, 1863) View in CoL View at ENA
Nebria rudis LeConte, 1863c: 3. Type locality: "Methy [Portage] [= Portage La Loche, northern Saskatchewan]" (original citation). Holotype [by monotypy] (♂) in MCZ [# 653]. Note. In the original description, LeConte indicated that he received "one specimen" from "Mr. Kennicott" collected at “Methy.” Lindroth (1961a: 59) placed the type locality in eastern Alberta. However, I was unable to find any such locality in Alberta, although there is a locality named “Metis” in northwestern Alberta. In the same paper, LeConte (1863c: 1) described his Cicindela hyperborea from specimen(s) received from "Mr. R. Kennicott" collected at "Methy Portage, Hudson’s Bay Territory." I believe LeConte meant "Methy Portage" as the collection site for Pelophila rudis . Located in northern Saskatchewan, Methy(e) Portage is currently called Portage La Loche.
Distribution.
This species is known from scattered localities from western Newfoundland (Lindroth 1955a: 39) to the Fairbanks area in Alaska (David H. Kavanaugh pers. comm. 2009), south to central British Columbia (Lindroth 1961a: 59) [see Lindroth 1963a: Fig. 65]. Fossil remnants, dated between 14,000 and 15,500 years B.P., have been unearthed in central Iowa (Schwert 1992: 76).
Records.
CAN: AB, BC, MB, NF, NT, ON, SK, YT USA: AK
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Pelophila rudis (LeConte, 1863)
Bousquet, Yves 2012 |
Nebria rudis
LeConte 1863 |