Chlorophorus annulatus ( Hope, 1831 ), 1984
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.3897/zookeys.1214.131143 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B85C4AFE-4E7C-4539-90FF-1E2B92412BC1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13871809 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/682536F5-A5A2-571E-9300-51D759BEFD05 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Chlorophorus annulatus ( Hope, 1831 ) |
status |
|
Chlorophorus annulatus ( Hope, 1831) View in CoL
Figs 17 View Figures 17, 18 , 18 View Figures 17, 18
Clytus annulatus Hope, 1831: 28. TL: Nepal. TD: OUMNH. View in CoL
Clytus signaticollis Laporte de Castelnau & Gory, 1841: 103. TL: India. TD: OUMNH. Syn. by Holzschuh 2020: 49. View in CoL
Anthoboscus signaticollis Chevrolat 1863: 303. View in CoL
Clytanthus signaticollis Waterhouse 1874 View in CoL : xxviii.
Chlorophorus signaticollis Schwarzer 1925: 27. View in CoL
Chlorophorus separatus Gressitt, 1940: 78. TL: China. TD: SYSU. Syn. by Holzschuh 2020: 49. View in CoL
Chlorophorus nigroannulatus Pic, 1943: 1. TL: Vietnam. TD: MNHN. Syn. by Holzschuh 2020: 49. View in CoL
Chlorophorus nigroannulatus v. rufonotatus Pic, 1943: 1. Syn. by Holzschuh, 2020: 49.
Rhaphuma signaticollis Ohbayashi 1963: 11. View in CoL
Chlorophorus nigroannulatus Villiers and Chûjô 1966: 552 [HN]. View in CoL
Chlorophorus viticis Gressitt & Rondon, 1970: 220, 225. TL: Laos. TD: BPBM. Syn. by Holzschuh 2020: 49. View in CoL
Chlorophorus annulatus Holzschuh 1984: 358. View in CoL
Chlorophorus (Chlorophorus) signaticollis Mitra et al. 2017: 81. View in CoL View Cited Treatment
Chlorophorus (Humeromaculatus) annulatus Lazarev and Murzin 2019: 765. View in CoL
Chlorophorus (Immaculatus) signaticollis Niisato in Danilevsky 2020: 231. View in CoL
Chlorophorus (Chlorophorus) annulatus Özdikmen 2022: 641, 686, 690. View in CoL
Specimens examined.
China • 16 ♂♂ 8 ♀♀; Yunnan Province, Pu’er City, Simao, Laiyang River ; 11–13 V. 2018; Qiu Jianyue, Peng Chenli and Xu Hao leg. ( SWU) • 25 ♂♂ 19 ♀♀; Yunnan Province, Pingbian County, Dawei Mountain ; 25–27 V. 2018; Qiu Jianyue, Peng Chenli and Xu Hao leg. ( SWU) .
Remarks.
This species is similar in elytral markings to C. fainanensis , but the male genitalia are distinctly different (Fig. 18 View Figures 17, 18 ).
New records for China
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Chlorophorus annulatus ( Hope, 1831 )
Fu, Zheng-Ju, Chen, Lu & Li, Zhu 2024 |
Chlorophorus (Chlorophorus) annulatus Özdikmen 2022: 641 , 686, 690.
Özdikmen H 2022: 641 |
Chlorophorus (Immaculatus) signaticollis
Danilevsky ML 2020: 231 |
Chlorophorus (Immaculatus) signaticollis Niisato in Danilevsky 2020: 231 . |
Chlorophorus (Humeromaculatus) annulatus
Lazarev MA & Murzin SV 2019: 765 |
Chlorophorus (Chlorophorus) signaticollis
Mitra B & Chakraborti U & Mallick K & Bhaumik S & Das P 2017: 81 |
Chlorophorus annulatus
Holzschuh C 1984: 358 |
Chlorophorus viticis
Holzschuh C 2020: 49 |
Gressitt JL & Rondon JA 1970: 220 |
Chlorophorus nigroannulatus Villiers and Chûjô 1966: 552 [HN].
Villiers A & Chûjô M 1966: 552 |
Rhaphuma signaticollis
Ohbayashi K 1963: 11 |
Chlorophorus nigroannulatus
Holzschuh C 2020: 49 |
Pic M 1943: 1 |
Chlorophorus nigroannulatus v. rufonotatus
Holzschuh C 2020: 49 |
Pic M 1943: 1 |
Chlorophorus separatus
Holzschuh C 2020: 49 |
Gressitt JL 1940: 78 |
Chlorophorus signaticollis
Schwarzer B 1925: 27 |
Anthoboscus signaticollis
Chevrolat LA 1863: 303 |
Clytus signaticollis
Holzschuh C 2020: 49 |
Laporte de Castelnau FL & Gory HL 1841: 103 |
Clytus annulatus
Hope W 1831: 28 |
Clytanthus signaticollis
Clytanthus signaticollis Waterhouse 1874 |