Compsodactylus argentinus ( Moser, 1919 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4679.1.9 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D4C36872-B5F6-4007-962D-ABD17CED9BF7 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3510468 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6902F102-7936-046B-FF48-4F111011FEB9 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Compsodactylus argentinus ( Moser, 1919 ) |
status |
|
Compsodactylus argentinus ( Moser, 1919) ; new combination
( Figs. 1–4 View FIGURES 1–8 , 10–13, 17–18 View FIGURES 9–20 , 21–22 View FIGURES 21–23 , 98 View FIGURES 98–99 )
Isonychus argentinus Moser, 1919: 41 ; Blackwelder 1944: 230 (checklist); Frey 1970b: 128, fig. 13 (aedeagus); Evans 2003: 275 (checklist); Evans & Smith 2009: 236 (checklist).
Compsodactylus scabrosus Fuhrmann, 2012: 47 View Cited Treatment ; Figueroa & Neita-Moreno 2019: 588; new synonym.
Diagnosis. Body without metallic reflections; females fusiform in lateral view; elytral striae strongly and regularly punctate; metatibia of males gradually enlarged ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 9–20 ); females with inner distal area of gonocoxite rounded.
Description. Emendation to Fuhrmann (2012) description (named as C. scabrosus new synonym). Body ( Figs. 1–2 View FIGURES 1–8 ) fusiform in dorsal and lateral view; length: 5.1–6.5 mm; greatest width at half of elytra: 2.2–3.2 mm. Dark brown with legs, elytra, and pygidium yellow. Head greatest width: 1.1–1.4 mm; eye small in dorsal view and interocular distance 5 times wider than eye width (measures taken at medial area of eyes). Epistomal suture straight or slightly sinuous. Clypeus with spine-like setae. Pronotum length: 1.7–1.9 mm; greatest width: 1.9–2.2 mm. Elytral striae strongly and regularly punctate. Metathoracic legs of males ( Figs. 11–13 View FIGURES 9–20 ) with femur slightly enlarged and posterior third with some inner spine-like setae; tibia gradually enlarged, posterior area almost straight ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 9–20 ), transverse carina I short and with some stout setae. Parameres as figured ( Figs. 17–18 View FIGURES 9–20 ). Endophallus ( Figs. 21–22 View FIGURES 21–23 ) with ventromedial area with asperites.
Remarks. Compsodactylus argentinus and C. parvulus are quite similar to each other, and the former is distinguished as follows (opposition to C. parulus ): clypeus with spine-like setae (with or without); female fusiform in lateral view (dorsoventrally flattened; Fuhrmann 2012: figs. 6, 9); elytra strongly and regularly punctate (shallowly and irregularly punctate); male metatibia progressively enlarged (abruptly enlarged in proximal third) ( Figs. 12, 15 View FIGURES 9–20 ); gonocoxite inner margin straight (rounded; Fuhrmann 2012: figs. 74–75). The aedeagus is helpful in species determination ( Figs. 17–23 View FIGURES 9–20 View FIGURES 21–23 ). Males of C. parvulus are relatively more dorsoventrally flattened than those of C. argentinus ( Figs. 2, 5 View FIGURES 1–8 ), but this characteristic is much more conspicuous in females.
Distribution. Argentina: Catamarca, Salta, Tucumán ( Fig. 98 View FIGURES 98–99 ).
Type series. Isonychus argentinus : the species was described based on an undetermined number of specimens. A male lectotype from ZMHU ( Figs. 1–2 View FIGURES 1–8 ) is hereby designated. Lectotype without external damage; labels ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1–8 ): [ Argentina | Pro. Salta | mtt. 1905 | Steinbach] [ Isonychus | argentinus | Type Mos.] [Berlin] [LECTOTYPE | Isonychus | argentinus | Moser, 1919 | des. J. Fuhrmann | 2014 ♂] [ Compsodactylus | argentinus | ( Moser, 1919) | des. J. Fuhrmann | 2014 ♂]. A male paralectotype was seen from ZMHU with similar labels to the lectotype.
Compsodactylus scabrosus : the species was described based on a male holotype and two male and two female paratypes, one of these females was designated as an allotype. Holotype from CEMT without external damage; labels ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 1–8 ): [ ARGENTINA, SALTA | Payogasta iii.1992] [HOLOTYPE ♂ | Compsodactylus | scabrosus | det. J. Fuhrmann, 2012].
Material examined. (9 specimens). ARGENTINA: SALTA, 1905, Steinach (collector), 2 ♂ (lectotype and paralectotype of I. argentinus ) ( ZMHU) , Payogasta , iii.1992, 1 ♂ (holotype of C. scabrosus ) ( CEMT) , 1 ♀, 2 ♂ (paratypes of C. scabrosus ) ( CEMT) ; TUCUMÁN, San Miguel de Tucumán (“Ciudad”), A. Martínez (collector), xii.1948, 1 ♀ (paratype of C. scabrosus ) ( MZSP) ; CATAMARCA, Andalhualá, Willik-Terán (collector), 20.ii.1967, 1 ♂, 1 ♀ ( CEMT) .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Compsodactylus argentinus ( Moser, 1919 )
Fuhrmann, Juares 2019 |
Isonychus argentinus
Evans, A. V. & Smith, A. B. T. 2009: 236 |
Evans, A. V. 2003: 275 |
Frey, G. 1970: 128 |
Blackwelder, R. E. 1944: 230 |
Moser, J. 1919: 41 |