Euphranta crux (Fabricius)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3635.4.6 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:77AF4C2D-832F-4655-B6A8-C4A5C291FEAB |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6165064 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/697787DA-FFA9-C02D-FF31-FE337011F9B9 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Euphranta crux (Fabricius) |
status |
|
Euphranta crux (Fabricius) View in CoL
( Figs 66–69 View FIGURES 65 – 72 )
Material examined: 4 3, 2 Ƥ, INDIA: Maharashtra, NRCC, Nagpur, 13.vii.2011, David K. J. (NBAII); 1 Ƥ, INDIA: Karnataka, Bangalore, 23.vii.1982, K. D. Ghorpade; 1 3, INDIA: Karnataka, Bangalore, 2.viii.1989, K. D. Ghorpade; 1 3, INDIA: Karnataka, Bangalore, 22.viii.1989, K. D. Ghorpade; 1 3, INDIA: Karnataka, Bangalore, 5.vii.1989, K. D. Ghorpade (TAUI); 1 Ƥ, INDIA: Dessa, vii.1898, Lt Col Nurse, 1916-49 (BMNH); 1 Ƥ, SRI LANKA: Trincomali, 21.vi. [18]91, Lt Col Yerbury, 1892-192 (BMNH).
Comments: This species is known from India, Sri Lanka (new record) and Thailand. Bezzi (1913) differentiated Euphranta crux (Fabricius) from E. dissoluta (Bezzi) by having an apical cross-shaped double band formed by the fusion of preapical and subapical band, whereas in E. dissoluta it is separate. Examination of the series of specimens listed above reveals that this is not a stable character and shows a wide range of variation ( Figs. 66–69 View FIGURES 65 – 72 ), i.e., the bands may be incompletely separate or incompletely fused. Moreover, the original descriptions of E. burtoni Hardy and E. dissoluta indicate that there is hardly any difference between them. Since the wing markings in this species are now known to be variable, E. dissoluta and E. burtoni are placed as new synonyms of E. crux .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |