Lithurgus atratiformis Cockerell
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.17161/jom.v0i11.4520 |
publication LSID |
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F8D5EC99-DB33-4628-B175-94D57B7FF550 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13228735 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/697F87FD-FF97-FFE6-FE0A-FA9450157C81 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Lithurgus atratiformis Cockerell |
status |
|
Lithurgus atratiformis Cockerell View in CoL
( Figs. 20–22 View Figures 20–22 )
Lithurgus atratiformis Cockerell, 1905: 295 View in CoL . Holotype: NHML No. 17.a.2098; ♀, NW coast of Australia.
DIAGNOSIS: Among Australian Lithurgus , L. atratiformis is most similar to L. atratus Smith in the black or dark brown sternal scopa, distal terga with dark setae ( Fig. 20 View Figures 20–22 ), and mesoscutum with strong rugulae ( Fig. 21 View Figures 20–22 ). The female can be distinguished from that species primarily by its larger body size (head width 4.5 mm vs. 4.2 mm) and broader facial prominence ( Fig. 22 View Figures 20–22 , about two-thirds length of lower interorbital distance vs. about half length of lower interorbital distance).
COMMENTS: Cockerell (1905) did not state the number of specimens on which he based the description of L. atratiformis but the female specimen deposited in the NHML has a label in Cockerell’s handwriting that reads “type”. Cockerell usually labeled one specimen as “type” and the others in the type series as “cotypes”, corresponding to the modern holotype and paratype concepts. A designation of lectotype is therefore not necessary as the NHML specimen is assuredly a holotype .
As indicated by Michener (1965), L. atratiformis is morphologically very similar to L. atratus , L. scabrosus (Smith) , and L. collaris Smith and they may be conspecific. Except for subtle differences in body size, we did not find consistent morphological differences between the male specimens associated with females that matched the type of L. atratiformis and those males associated with females that matched the type of L. atratus . For this reason, the males of both species are not separated in the key.
NHML |
Natural History Museum, Tripoli |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Lithurgus atratiformis Cockerell
Gonzalez, Victor H., Engel, Michael S. & Griswold, Terry L. 2013 |
Lithurgus atratiformis
Cockerell, T. D. A. 1905: 295 |