Lithurgus atratiformis Cockerell

Gonzalez, Victor H., Engel, Michael S. & Griswold, Terry L., 2013, The lithurgine bees of Australia (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae), with a note on Megachile rotundipennis, Journal of Melittology 2013 (11), pp. 1-19 : 10-11

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.17161/jom.v0i11.4520

publication LSID

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F8D5EC99-DB33-4628-B175-94D57B7FF550

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13228735

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/697F87FD-FF97-FFE6-FE0A-FA9450157C81

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Lithurgus atratiformis Cockerell
status

 

Lithurgus atratiformis Cockerell View in CoL

( Figs. 20–22 View Figures 20–22 )

Lithurgus atratiformis Cockerell, 1905: 295 View in CoL . Holotype: NHML No. 17.a.2098; ♀, NW coast of Australia.

DIAGNOSIS: Among Australian Lithurgus , L. atratiformis is most similar to L. atratus Smith in the black or dark brown sternal scopa, distal terga with dark setae ( Fig. 20 View Figures 20–22 ), and mesoscutum with strong rugulae ( Fig. 21 View Figures 20–22 ). The female can be distinguished from that species primarily by its larger body size (head width 4.5 mm vs. 4.2 mm) and broader facial prominence ( Fig. 22 View Figures 20–22 , about two-thirds length of lower interorbital distance vs. about half length of lower interorbital distance).

COMMENTS: Cockerell (1905) did not state the number of specimens on which he based the description of L. atratiformis but the female specimen deposited in the NHML has a label in Cockerell’s handwriting that reads “type”. Cockerell usually labeled one specimen as “type” and the others in the type series as “cotypes”, corresponding to the modern holotype and paratype concepts. A designation of lectotype is therefore not necessary as the NHML specimen is assuredly a holotype .

As indicated by Michener (1965), L. atratiformis is morphologically very similar to L. atratus , L. scabrosus (Smith) , and L. collaris Smith and they may be conspecific. Except for subtle differences in body size, we did not find consistent morphological differences between the male specimens associated with females that matched the type of L. atratiformis and those males associated with females that matched the type of L. atratus . For this reason, the males of both species are not separated in the key.

NHML

Natural History Museum, Tripoli

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hymenoptera

Family

Megachilidae

Genus

Lithurgus

Loc

Lithurgus atratiformis Cockerell

Gonzalez, Victor H., Engel, Michael S. & Griswold, Terry L. 2013
2013
Loc

Lithurgus atratiformis

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1905: 295
1905
Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF