Hercostomus baishanzuensis

Tang, Chufei, Zhang, Lili & Yang, Ding, 2014, New species of Hercostomus baishanzuensis group from Tibet (Diptera: Dolichopodidae, Dolichopodinae), Zootaxa 3881 (6), pp. 549-562 : 550-551

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3881.6.4

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:57712A76-D455-4B39-9BAE-6EF3C13837F4

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6123501

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6A2287F2-4B64-FFCA-FF09-FE3C07AFFD1F

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Hercostomus baishanzuensis
status

 

Key to species (males) of Hercostomus baishanzuensis View in CoL group

(modified from Yang et al. 2011)

1 Acr present.......................................................................................... 2

– Acr absent.......................................................................................... 25

2 First flagellomere elongated, at least 2 times longer than wide................................................. 3

– First flagellomere not elongated, less than 2 times width..................................................... 9

3 Postocular bristles black............................................................................... 4

– Mid and lower postocular bristles pale yellow................................... H. caixiae Zhang, Yang et Grootaert View in CoL

4 Basal segment of arista short, 0.3 times as long as apical portion of arista ( Yang et al 2011, fig. 434)............................................................................................... H. curvilobatus Yang et Saigusa View in CoL

– Basal segment long, 0.5–1.0 times as long as apical portion of arista............................................ 5

5 Arista arising at middle of the first flagellomere............................................................ 6

– Arista arising near the base of the first flagellomere......................................................... 7

6 Phallus specialized, hazelnut-shaped at tip ( Fig. 21 View FIGURES 20 – 21 )......................................... H. nuciformis View in CoL sp. nov.

– Phallus not strongly modified ( Yang et al. 2011, fig. 431)............................ H. baishuihensis Yang et Saigusa View in CoL

7 Fore tibia with 1 weak apical bristle......................................................... H. spatiosus Yang View in CoL

– Fore tibia without apical bristle......................................................................... 8

8 Arista arising at basal third of first flagellomere; inner epandrial lobe small ( Yang et al. 2011, fig. 440).............................................................................................. H. jingxingensis Yang et Saigusa View in CoL

– Arista arising at basal fourth of first flagellomere; inner epandrial lobe long and finger-shaped ( Yang et al. 2011, fig. 447).............................................................................. H. qinlingensis Yang et Saigusa View in CoL

9 Coxae not all black................................................................................... 10

– Coxae all wholly black................................................................................ 13

10 Fore coxa brownish ( Fig. 9)........................................................... H. pailongensis View in CoL sp. nov.

– Fore coxa yellow................................................................................... 11

11 Mid and hind coxae black............................................................... H. fanjingensis Wei

– Mid coxa blackish to black except at base, hind coxa yellow................................................. 12

12 Antenna dark yellow, first flagellomere black except base; fore tibia with 1 short ventral apical bristle (longer than width of fore tibia); outer epandrial lobe long and narrow ( Yang et al. 2011, fig. 443)............. H. longilobatus Yang et Saigusa View in CoL

– Antenna black; fore tibia with 1 long apical ventral bristle (nearly as long as fore tarsomeres 1); outer epandrial lobe wide ( Yang et al. 2011, fig. 441)...................................................... H. latilobatus Yang et Saigusa View in CoL

13 Basal segment of arista short, shorter than 0.3 times length of apical portion of arista.............................. 14

– Basal segment of arista long, about 0.4–0.6 times length of apical portion of arista................................ 16

14 Fore tibia with apical bristle........................................................................... 15

– Fore tibia without apical bristle......................................................... H. xinjianganus Yang View in CoL

15 Male cercus brown ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 5 – 6 ).......................................................... H. galonglaensis View in CoL sp. nov.

– Male cercus mainly brown, but yellowish at base ( Fig. 4)....................................... H. flavus View in CoL sp. nov.

16 Mid and lower postocular bristles light yellow............................................................ 17

– All postocular bristles black........................................................................... 18

17 First flagellomere 1.7 times longer than wide, arista arising from middle; cercus nearly square ( Yang et al. 2011, fig. 432)........................................................................................... H. basalis Yang View in CoL

– First flagellomere as long as wide, arista arising subapically; cercus nearly triangular ( Yang et al. 2011, fig. 450).................................................................................... H. subtruncatus Yang et Saigusa View in CoL

18 Male cercus with short to long digitations................................................................ 19

– Male cercus only with short digitations.................................................................. 20

19 First flagellomere blunt at tip; inner epandrial lobe short and thin ( Yang et al. 2011, fig. 444). H. masunagai Yang et Saigusa View in CoL

– First flagellomere sharp at tip; inner epandrial lobe long and strong ( Yang et al. 2011, fig. 435)................................................................................................... H. curviphallus Yang et Saigusa View in CoL

20 Inner epandrial lobe long, nearly as long as outer epandrial lobe ( Yang et al. 2011, fig. 453).......... H. xizangensis Yang View in CoL

– Inner epandrial lobe not obvious or very short............................................................ 21

21 Fore tibia with 1 long obvious ventral apical bristle........................................................ 22

– Fore tibia without obvious ventral apical bristle........................................................... 23

22 First flagellomere 1.8 times longer than wide, sharp at tip; femora blackish to black ( Yang et al. 2011, fig. 439)............................................................................................... H. hunanensis Yang View in CoL

– First flagellomere 1.4 times longer than wide, blunt at tip; femora dark yellow ( Yang et al. 2011, fig. 438)............................................................................................ H. hubeiensis Yang et Saigusa View in CoL

23 Inner epandrial lobe weak ( Yang et al. 2011, fig. 445).................................. H. medialis Yang et Saigusa View in CoL

– Inner epandrial lobe obvious.......................................................................... 24

24 Femora black, but tip yellowish brown.............................................. H. serratus Yang et Saigusa View in CoL

– Femora yellow, somehow dark at dorsum..................................................... H. dentalis Yang View in CoL

25 Fore tibia with apical bristles.......................................................................... 26

–......................................................................... Fore tibia without apical bristle 29

26 Fore tibia with 3 apical bristles ( Fig. 1)...................................................... H. bisetus View in CoL sp. nov.

– Fore tibia with 1 apical bristle......................................................................... 27

27 Hypandrium thick, with spinous digitations on base ( Yang et al. 2011, fig. 429)........... H. apicispinus Yang et Saigusa View in CoL

–........................................................... Hypandrium without spinous digitations on base 28

28 Legs mainly black; outer epandrial lobe short and thick; male cercus with short digitations ( Yang et al. 2011, fig. 430)................................................................................. H. baishanzuensis Yang et Yang View in CoL

– Legs mainly yellow; outer epandrial lobe long and narrow; male cercus with long digitations ( Yang et al. 2011, fig. 442)............................................................................. H. longidigitatus Yang et Saigusa View in CoL

29 Legs mainly black.................................................................................. 30

– Legs mainly yellow....................................................................... H. nudus Yang View in CoL

30 Phallus with 1 large, sharp dorsal tooth ( Fig. 14 View FIGURES 13 – 15 )........................................... H. deltodontus View in CoL sp. nov.

– Phallus without tooth ( Yang et al. 2011, fig. 451).................................. H. subtruncatus Yang et Saigusa View in CoL

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Diptera

Family

Dolichopodidae

Genus

Hercostomus

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF