Ctenomorpha marginipennis Gray

Hasenpusch, Jack & Brock, Paul D., 2006, Studies on the Australian stick insect genus Ctenomorpha Gray (Phasmida: Phasmatidae: Phasmatinae), with the description of a new large species, Zootaxa 1282, pp. 1-15 : 4-8

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.173413

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5620920

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6A5787A7-FF99-2E48-FE8A-2BFFFBA6F2C3

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Ctenomorpha marginipennis Gray
status

 

Ctenomorpha marginipennis Gray View in CoL [Margined­winged Stick­insect]

( Figs. 1–6)

Phasma (Ctenomorpha) marginipennis Gray, 1833: 16 , pl. 1: 2 (marginipenne on p.27). Lectotype ♂, Australia, here designated (body length 110 mm) (OXUM) (originally designated by Key, 1960: 236, from Gray’s figure, in the mistaken belief that ‘all the original material appears to be lost’, hence invalid). A further two or more ♂ paralectotypes from Australia said to be in BMNH, ‘brought by Mr Hunter (the surgeon who accompanied Captain King’s voyages), probably from the north­west coast’, have not been traced. [This lectotype designation shall guarantee the stability of the name].

Ctenomorpha marginipennis View in CoL ; Gray, 1835: 41, Burmeister, 1840: 38, Kirby, 1904: 388, Otte & Brock, 2005: 112. Several other references only refer to C. marginipennis View in CoL as a synonym of C. chronus View in CoL , following Westwood, 1859: 114. However, marginipennis View in CoL was selected over chronus View in CoL by the first reviser, Burmeister (1840: 38). Vickery, 1983: 5, stated that the male in OXUM is the holotype, but this is clearly not the case from Gray’s description.

Phasma (Diura) chronus Gray, 1833: 20 View in CoL , pl. 5: 2. Lectotype &, Australia (probably Tasmania), based on Gray’s figure, designated by Key, 1960: 236, synonymised by Burmeister, 1840: 38. Gray comments ‘This insect is often found in collections, and I believe is confined to Van Diemen’s Land [i.e. Tasmania].’

Acrophylla chronus View in CoL ; Gray, 1835: 39, Serville, 1838: 232, Westwood, 1859: 114, Redtenbacher, 1908: 457.

Cyphocrania chronus View in CoL ; Burmeister, 1838: 580.

Ctenomorpha chronus View in CoL ; Vickery, 1983: 5, Balderson et al, 1998: 365.

The following references list chronus View in CoL as a synonym of marginipennis: Kirby, 1904: 388 View in CoL , Otte & Brock, 2005: 112.

Acrophylla oxyacantha Redtenbacher, 1908: 457 View in CoL . Lectotype &, [ Australia], Tasmanie, i.[18]47, Verreaux, Museum Paris (NHMW, No. 867), here designated. Paralectotype series: &, Australia, New South Wales, Thorey, &, Australia, Sydney, Thorey, &, Australia, New South Wales, Dämel, &, Australia, 1863, Brun, & Australia, Sydney, Novara Expedition, 1857­59, Frauenfeld (NHMW, No. 867). Also in ZMAS, locality not known, but not traced in MNHN and ZMUH, synonymised by Vickery, 1983: 5. [This lectotype designation shall guarantee the stability of the name].

Acrophylla phyllocerca Redtenbacher, 1908: 457 View in CoL . Lectotype ♂, Australia [ New Holland], Thorey (NHMW, No. 870), here designated. Paralectotype series: &, Australia [ New Holland], Thorey, ♂, Australia, Deyrolle, &, Australia, &, Australia, [18]90, Prinz (according to Redtenbacher specimens are from Adelaide and Melbourne) (NHMW, No. 870). Not traced in MNHN. Also in MNMS: New Zealand (?), synonymised by Vickery, 1983: 5. [This lectotype designation shall guarantee the stability of the name].

Acrophylla scutigera Redtenbacher, 1908: 457 View in CoL . & (number not known) Australia, Melbourne (not traced in MNHN, according to Vickery (1983) in MVMA) [not examined], synonymised by Vickery, 1983: 5.

Ctenomorpha tasmanensis Lea, 1902: 395 . Holotype &, Australia, Burnie, Tasmania (TMUH) [not examined], synonymised by Vickery, 1983: 5.

Useful non­taxonomic references of ‘The Great Brown Stick­Insect’ ( Coleman, 1942a & b, 1943 & 1944) and Ctenomorpha View in CoL sp. ( Clyne, 1979: 23, pl.) give brief details on biology and behaviour. Although this species has been reared recently, there are no published observations.

In his catalogue on Australian phasmids, Vickery (1983) stated that ‘all synonymy is from the literature; no new synonymy is presented in this work.’ However, he went on to list several new synonyms, including five of chronus , presumably based on geographical range and / or examination of figures, as these synonyms have not been traced in the literature. Unfortunately, the author did not respond to written queries in the 1990’s on entries in his catalogue. In case there is any doubt concerning the synonymy, it is confirmed for the four species above. However, variation is considerable, resulting in authors describing them as new species. Redtenbacher’s key to both sexes gives details of differences, i.e. they may have the thorax granulated, tuberculated or with irregular spines. Females have a short­winged form described as phyllocerca by Redtenbacher, lobes present or absent on tibiae.

Non­type material examined

Detailed studies made on 22 specimens (9 ♂, 11Ψ, 2Ψ nymphs) in BMNH, with various data (details upon request), all identified as Ctenomorpha chronus (Gray) by K. H. L. Key, either in 1956 (donated specimens), or 1958, when he visited the BMNH). Specimens also examined in numerous museums in Australia and Europe, and the private collection of A. Hiller.

Male and female ( Figs. 1–5)

Gray, 1833 provided adequate descriptions and figures of both sexes. The size, degree of tuberculation of the thorax varies, depending on which locality specimens are from and probably the choice of host foodplant(s).

Distribution

Apparently widespread in New South Wales, South­East Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania and Victoria. There is even a possibility that they occur in north Queensland, if the five specimens (2♂, 3Ψ) in RSME from Mossman are correctly labelled. Efforts will be made to obtain these insects and compare the eggs. Rentz (1996) comments: ‘quite common in heath and woodland habitats’. Foodplants include Eucalyptus species ( Clyne, 1979, Coleman, 1942a & b, 1943 & 1944) and Prunus .

Egg ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 )

First described by Kaup (1871, a crude sketch of this species) and later figured by Coleman (1942b), Key (1970, 1991) and Hughes & Westoby (1992), the egg is brown, capsule strongly sculptured, raised in a series of ribs. Micropylar plate almost circular, except sharply pointed at either end. Operculum flat, bearing small stalked capitulum. Average capsule length 3.5 mm, height 2.5 mm, width 2.0 mm.

Notes

Craddock (1972) discussed chromosomal diversity of some Australian phasmids and found a geographic pattern of karyotypic differentiation in this species.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Phasmida

Family

Phasmatidae

SubFamily

Phasmatinae

Genus

Ctenomorpha

Loc

Ctenomorpha marginipennis Gray

Hasenpusch, Jack & Brock, Paul D. 2006
2006
Loc

Ctenomorpha chronus

Balderson 1998: 365
Vickery 1983: 5
1983
Loc

Acrophylla oxyacantha

Vickery 1983: 5
Redtenbacher 1908: 457
1908
Loc

Acrophylla phyllocerca

Vickery 1983: 5
Redtenbacher 1908: 457
1908
Loc

Acrophylla scutigera

Vickery 1983: 5
Redtenbacher 1908: 457
1908
Loc

Ctenomorpha tasmanensis

Vickery 1983: 5
Lea 1902: 395
1902
Loc

Cyphocrania chronus

Burmeister 1838: 580
1838
Loc

Ctenomorpha marginipennis

Otte 2005: 112
Vickery 1983: 5
Kirby 1904: 388
Westwood 1859: 114
Gray 1835: 41
1835
Loc

Acrophylla chronus

Redtenbacher 1908: 457
Westwood 1859: 114
Serville 1838: 232
Gray 1835: 39
1835
Loc

Phasma (Ctenomorpha) marginipennis

Key 1960: 236
Gray 1833: 16
1833
Loc

Phasma (Diura) chronus

Key 1960: 236
Gray 1833: 20
1833
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF