Aphractia andrenoides ( Bromley, 1934 ) Camargo & Vieira & Rafael, 2024
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5436.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:42656763-C43A-4762-9678-EBE40136907B |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6B7E87DC-FFE2-FF91-FF34-46C1C03AFD14 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Aphractia andrenoides ( Bromley, 1934 ) |
status |
stat. rev. et comb. nov. |
Aphractia andrenoides ( Bromley, 1934) stat. rev. et comb. nov.
( Figs 42–48 View FIGURE 42 View FIGURE 43 View FIGURE 44 View FIGURE 45 View FIGURE 46 View FIGURE 47 View FIGURE 48 )
Atomosia andrenoides Bromley, 1934: 339 View in CoL ; Hull, 1962 (1): 373 (synopsis of world fauna); Martin & Papavero, 1970: 46 (catalogue).
Aphestia andrenoides ; Curran, 1935: 5 (key for Atomosia View in CoL ); Artigas, Papavero & Serra, 1991: 58 (synonymization with Aphestia nigra Bigot, 1878 View in CoL , Atomosiini View in CoL catalogue); Papavero, 2009: 85 (catalogue).
Diagnosis. Mystacal macrosetae and setae yellowish white ( Figs 42B–C View FIGURE 42 , 43B–C View FIGURE 43 , 44C–D View FIGURE 44 , 45C–D View FIGURE 45 ); postpedicel filiform distally, black, except base and ventrally, reddish yellow ( Fig. 45E–F View FIGURE 45 ); 3 pairs of reddish yellow marginal scutellar macrosetae ( Figs 42D View FIGURE 42 , 43D View FIGURE 43 , 44E View FIGURE 44 , 45G View FIGURE 45 ); fore leg with yellow femur and tibia ( Figs 42A View FIGURE 42 , 43A View FIGURE 43 , 44B View FIGURE 44 , 45B View FIGURE 45 ); abdominal tergites with a reddish yellow band posteriorly ( Figs 42A View FIGURE 42 , 43A View FIGURE 43 , 44A, G View FIGURE 44 , 45A–B View FIGURE 45 ).
Redescription. Paratype female ( Fig. 44 View FIGURE 44 ). Head ( Fig. 44C–D View FIGURE 44 ): black, yellowish white pruinose ( Fig. 44C–D View FIGURE 44 ), except lower half of face and anterior half of ocellar tubercle (posterior half apruinose) white and occiput golden; frons with convergent slopes; orbital setae yellowish white; mystacal macrosetae and setae yellowish white ( Fig. 44C–D View FIGURE 44 ); gena dark brown; ocelli dark brown, 2 dark brown ocellar setae; vertex densely pruinose medially, forming a V shape (in dorsal view), yellowish white setose; 21–22 yellowish postocular macrosetae, distributed laterally until lower margin; occipital and lower occipital setae yellowish white; proboscis shining black, base and apex reddish brown, proboscial setae yellowish white and labial yellowish; palpus brown, yellowish white setose ( Fig. 44C–D View FIGURE 44 ). Antenna: scape and pedicel yellow, brown setose, except scape yellow setose ventrally and pedicel with two apical, internal yellow setae ( Fig. 44C–D View FIGURE 44 ); (addendum) postpedicel tapering distally, filiform, black, except base and ventral half, reddish yellow, sparsely brown pruinose; sensorial element black; sensorial area pale yellow, slightly smaller than male ( Fig. 45F View FIGURE 45 ).
Thorax ( Fig. 44A–B, E View FIGURE 44 ): black, antepronotum and pleuron white pruinose, scutum, scutellum, meso and metathoracic spiracles golden and lateral margins of scutum yellowish white pruinose; postpronotal lobe and postalar callus reddish brown ( Fig. 44E View FIGURE 44 ). Chaetotaxy: mostly white setose, punctations golden, katatergite and anatergite yellow setose; macrosetae: antepronotal yellow; 2 notopleural and 1 supra-alar black, 3 postalar black to reddish yellow ( Fig. 44E View FIGURE 44 ), 6 reddish yellow marginal scutellar (3 pairs) ( Fig. 44E View FIGURE 44 ) and 3 reddish yellow posterior anepisternal.
Wings ( Fig. 44F View FIGURE 44 ): translucent; veins dark brown, light brown at wing base; cell r 5 closed before wing margin on right wing and open on left wing; crossvein r-m before half of discal cell; cells m 3 and cua closed before wing margin and petiolate; halteres yellow.
Legs ( Fig. 44B View FIGURE 44 ): yellow to reddish yellow except, mid and hind coxae yellowish brown; mid femur with dorsal distal fourth brown, hind femur with apical third dark brown; mid tibia darker distally, hind tibia brown on apical third; fore tarsus with tarsomeres 2–5 gradually from yellow to dark brown, mid and hind tarsi black; coxae white pruinose. Chaetotaxy: coxae white and trochanters yellowish white setose; fore and mid femora dorsodistally yellowish white and black setose, hind femur yellowish setose, black on apical third; fore femur with 1 anterodistal, 1 anterodorsal distal and 1 dorsal yellow macrosetae; mid femur with 2 anterior, 1 anterodorsal and 2 dorsal distal yellow macrosetae; hind femur with 5 dorsal yellow and 1 dorsal distal black macroseta; tibiae yellowish setose, black distally on mid and hind tibiae, fore and mid tibiae with reddish yellow macrosetae, hind tibia with black macrosetae dorsally; tarsi black setose dorsally, tarsomeres 1–2 with yellow dorsal macrosetae, black on tarsomeres 3–5, ventral macrosetae reddish yellow; brush setae reddish yellow; claws black, reddish at base; empodium and pulvilli reddish yellow at base and yellowish distally.
Abdomen ( Fig. 44A–B, G–H View FIGURE 44 ): black, tergites a with reddish yellow band posteriorly ( Fig. 44A–B, G View FIGURE 44 ); punctate with reddish yellow dorsal and yellowish white lateral setae; T1 with 4, T2 with 2, T3–5 with 1 and T6 with 3 yellow lateral marginal macrosetae ( Fig. 44G View FIGURE 44 ); sternites reddish brown with sparse whitish to yellow setae ( Fig. 44H View FIGURE 44 ).
Terminalia ( Fig. 44H View FIGURE 44 ): reddish brown, yellow and whitish setose ( Fig. 44H View FIGURE 44 ); (addendum) T9+T10+cercus reniform, cuneiform indented mid-posteriorly ( Fig. 47A View FIGURE 47 ); hypoproct rounded ( Fig. 47B View FIGURE 47 ); S8 almost trapezoidal, concave mid-anteriorly, posterior margin with a conic projection on each corner bearing 1 apical macroseta, laterally setose ( Fig. 47C View FIGURE 47 ); spermathecae with 10 turns; spermathecal ducts with balled aspect; sperm pump differentiated, thicker and very sclerotized; genital fork U-shaped; accessory gland oval ( Fig. 47D View FIGURE 47 ).
Length. Body 10.5 mm; wings: 10.2 mm.
Paratype condition. Postpedicel missing ( Fig. 44A–D View FIGURE 44 ), 4 marginal scutellar macrosetae broken, one of these missing ( Fig. 44E View FIGURE 44 ).
Male identified specimen ( Figs 45A–E, G–H View FIGURE 45 , 46 View FIGURE 46 ). Similar to female, except postpedicel with sensorial area brown pruinose, slightly larger than in female ( Fig. 45E View FIGURE 45 ) and terminalia brownish yellow and light brown setose, except gonocoxite brown and yellowish setose; oval in dorsal and ventral views ( Fig. 46A–B View FIGURE 46 ); epandrium truncate posteriorly, sparsely setose ( Fig. 46A, E View FIGURE 46 ); cercus rounded, dorsally setose ( Fig. 46A, E View FIGURE 46 ); subepandrial sclerite obtuse distally, dorsally setose ( Fig. 46A, E View FIGURE 46 ); gonocoxite rounded basally, posteriorly conic, sparsely setose ( Fig. 46C, G–H View FIGURE 46 ); gonostylus rectangular, distally setose ( Fig. 46G–H View FIGURE 46 ); hypandrium reniform, marginally sheathed ( Fig. 46F View FIGURE 46 ); phallus with prongs ending hook-shaped ( Fig. 46I–K View FIGURE 46 ); parameral sheath conic posteriorly ( Fig. 46I View FIGURE 46 ); parameral apodeme directed ventrally ( Fig. 46I–K View FIGURE 46 ); ejaculatory apodeme fan-shaped ( Fig. 46J View FIGURE 46 ).
Variation. Postpedicel completely black; scape and pedicel reddish brown; four postalar macrosetae black; four marginal scutellar macrosetae yellow, intermingled by short yellow setae; legs whitish setose; males slender, females more robust.
Distribution. Mexico (Veracruz), Costa Rica (Heredia), Panama (Darién and Panamá Oeste), Guyana (Cuyuni-Mazaruni) and Brazil (Amazonas) ( Fig. 48 View FIGURE 48 ).
Taxonomic discussion. Bromley (1934) described Atomosia andrenoides mentioning the large size of the individuals (10–11 mm) and the absence of postpedicel among type specimens ( Figs 42–44 View FIGURE 42 View FIGURE 43 View FIGURE 44 ). He probably included this species in Atomosia based on the presence of some thick setae intermingled with thin setae on the anatergite, a feature present in Atomosia . The absence of postpedicel among type specimens may have been another factor that induced him to allocate this species to Atomosia .
Artigas et al. (1991) synonymized this species with Aphestia nigra without explaining the reasons for the transference. It may have been based on the absence of postpedicel among type specimens ( Figs 42–44 View FIGURE 42 View FIGURE 43 View FIGURE 44 ) and the presence of marginal lateral macrosetae on all abdominal tergites ( Fig. 44G View FIGURE 44 ).
The postpedicel is extremely important for correct identification at the genus and species level in Atomosiini . Curiously, Artigas et al. (1991) proposed Aphractia Artigas, Papavero & Serra, 1991 which possesses as the main features the postpedicel ending in a filiform process and marginal lateral macrosetae on all abdominal tergites, in the same work where they synonymized Atomosia andrenoides with Aphestia nigra . It is possible to suppose that if the type material were complete (with postpedicel), its transfer to Aphractia would have been proposed already.
As a result, this species belongs neither to Atomosia nor to Aphestia . But in contrast, it is similar to members of Aphractia . Thus, the previously proposed synonymy and the generic combination cannot be maintained and Aphractia andrenoides ( Bromley, 1934) stat. rev. et comb. nov. has herein its status revalidated and a new combination with Aphractia Artigas, Papavero & Serra, 1991 proposed.
Material examined. Holotype. [ GUYANA. Cuyuni-Mazaruni] Kartabo Bartica District British Guiana 1924 / HOLOTYPE ♂ Atomosia andrenoides Bromley / Atomosia andrenoides ♂ Det. S. W. Bromley / 24676 ( Fig. 42A View FIGURE 42 ) (♂ AMNH) . Paratypes. [ GUYANA. Cuyuni-Mazaruni] Kartabo Bartica District British Guiana 23–viii–1922
/ ALLOTYPE ♀ Atomosia andrenoides Br ( Fig. 43A View FIGURE 43 ) (1♀ AMNH); [ GUYANA. Cuyuni-Mazaruni] Kartabo Bartica District British Guiana 23–v–1924 / PARATYPE Atomosia andrenoides Bromley / SW Bromley Collection 1955 / Atomosia andrenoides Det. S. W. Bromley [19]29 / SW Bromley Collection 1955 / USNMENT 01224860 ( Fig. 44A View FIGURE 44 ) (1♀ NMNH). Additional material. MEXICO. Veracruz: Est. Biol. De Los Tuxtlas 18°35’N 95°05’W / 25.iv.1991 H.A. Hespenheide (1♀ COEF); COSTA RICA. Prov. Heredia: F. La Selva 3 km S.[outh] Pto. Viejo 10°26’N 84°01’W / vii.23.1976 H.A. Hespenheide / A547 / ant. seg. 1 black / Atractia? comata Herm. Det. E.M. Fisher [19]77 (1♂ COEF); PANAMA. Darién: Rio Tacarcuna, Darien Prov. 1.900 ft. [579 meters] 19.july.63 / gift of G.B. Fairchild (1♂ COEF); Canal Zone, [Panamá Oeste] Barro Colorado: Is.[Island] 9°10’N 79°50’W / 19.vii.1974 H.A. Hespenheide / UMW 24–25 0.0255 GM / Atractia comata Herm. Det. E.M. Fisher [19]77 (1♂ COEF); Same data / i. vii.1977, H.A. Hespenheide / WMW 7–8 WT = 0.03476M / A5136 / Aphractia? comata Herm. Det. E.M. Fisher [19]78 (1♀ COEF); BRASIL. Amazonas: Parque Nacional do Jaú 29.vii–08.viii.2001 015342S, 613510W / Arm.[adilha] Malaise, campinarana alta Henriques & Vidal (1♂ INPA); 60 km N.[norte] Manaus Fazenda Esteio ZF 3 km 23 / 19.NOV.1985 B.C. Klein Arm.[adilha] Malaise / Reserva 1112 R.C.E. / Atractia Macquart [dissected] (1♀ INPA); Manaus, Res.[erva] Ducke 05–16.viii.1994, J.A. Rafael & J. Vidal / Arm.[adilha] suspensa, Estação, 1, 5 m [dissected] (1♂ INPA); Manacapuru, 13.ix.1981 João Vidal (1♂ INPA); Maués 12–1936 (1♀ CEIOC).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Aphractia andrenoides ( Bromley, 1934 )
Camargo, Alexssandro, Vieira, Rodrigo & Rafael, José Albertino 2024 |
Aphestia andrenoides
Artigas, J. N. & Papavero, N. & Serra, A. M. 1991: 58 |
Curran, C. H. 1935: 5 |
Atomosia andrenoides Bromley, 1934: 339
Martin, C. H. & Papavero, N. 1970: 46 |
Bromley, S. W. 1934: 339 |