Marchalina, Vayssiere, 1923
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.2646249 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B4639508-1CC3-4167-8CD8-E274086F5330 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6C123514-FFB6-FF8E-FECB-FDE7D4B6FAFE |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Marchalina |
status |
|
MARCHALINA Vayssière View in CoL View at ENA
Marchalina Vayssière, 1923: 427 View in CoL .
Type species: Monophlebus hellenicus Gennadius View in CoL by monotypy and original designation.
Generic diagnosis. Restricted to Pinaceae , where most stages live in cracks and crevices on the branches and/or the trunk. All stages yellow. Adult female ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ; Plate 1 View PLATE 1 ): large, secreting a white, woolly ovisac during oviposition. Derm membranous; dorsum and venter covered in abundant hairs, rather fewer setae, ranging from hairlike setae with shallow basal sockets to collared setae with deep, collarlike basal sockets; with quite large loculate pores, each with a central ring of 2–9 loculi arranged like petals on a flower, and an outer ring of perhaps 12–18 (rather obscure) loculi; distribution of setae and pores rather clearly segmental on thorax and abdomen; also with some small conical pores between eyespots and scape; cicatrice absent. Antennae 11 segmented; eyespots surrounded by a strongly sclerotised area; mouthparts represented by some poorly sclerotised sclerites and a membranous labium; stylets totally wanting; legs well developed, without articulation between tibia and tarsus; prothoracic legs with particularly welldeveloped coxal ridges; each trochanter with a long seta on ventral surface in addition to other setae; claw with several minute denticles; claw digitules setose; thoracic spiracles relatively small; with 7 pairs of small abdominal spiracles, each with a distinct atrium; anal tube sclerotised, tubelike, without pores; possibly with a spermatheca associated with the oviduct. 3rdinstar female ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 ): similar to adult female but with welldeveloped mouthparts, many dermal spines on posterior abdominal segments and antennae with only 9 segments. 2ndinstar (probably female) ( Figs 3 View FIGURE 3 & 4 View FIGURE 4 ): as for 3rdinstar but with fewer dermal spines on posterior abdominal segments and only 6segmented antennae; claw digitules without capitate apices. 1stinstar nymph ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 ): similar to 2nd instar in having 6segmented antennae but body much less hirsute, with few hairs, setae and very few dermal spines; claw digitules with small capitate apices; mouthparts proportionately rather large. Prepupa ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 ): rather similar to 3rdinstar female in having only 9segmented antennae but mouthparts reduced to a few sclerites and a membranous labium without stylets; also with very few dermal spines on posterior abdominal segments. Pupa (of apterous male) ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 ): somewhat similar to pupa but with 10segmented antennae; very few hairs and setae; no dermal spines on abdomen; legs without claws; anal tube present; genital structures present as a more or less round sclerotised area on ventral surface of posterior abdomen. Adult male (apterous) ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 ; Plate 2 View PLATE 2 ): derm mainly membranous; both dorsum and venter with hairs, setae, loculate pores and a few small conical pores; loculate pores forming a denser band across dorsum of abdominal segment VI; tubular ducts restricted to a transverse group across abdominal segment VII; posttergites present on M. hellenica (possibly absent from apterous male of M. caucasica ); antennae 10 segmented, most segments with satellite setae; compound eyes well developed; head with ( M. hellenica ) or possibly without ( M. caucasica ) a cervical groove between head and thorax; dorsally with ( M. hellenica ) or without ( M. caucasica ) a postoccipital ridge; both species with a ventral midcranial and preocular ridges but preoral ridge also present on M. hellenica ; legs well developed; each trochanter with a long seta on ventral surface in addition to other setae; tibia and tarsi with bifurcated spines; tarsi 2 segmented; claws with several minute denticles; claw digitules setose; thoracic spiracles well developed; abdominal spiracles smaller, with 7 pairs; penial sheath well developed, with an elongate, eversible, spinose endophallus.
Comment. One of the main characters that diagnoses Marchalina (and therefore the Marchalinidae ) is, on the adult male, the restriction of the tubular ducts on the dorsal surface of the abdomen to abdominal segment VII only, these being replaced by numerous loculate pores on segment VI. In all other margarodoid families which have both tubular ducts and loculate pores on the abdomen, the tubular ducts are present on both segments VI and VII (i.e., Margarodidae , Xylococcidae , Kuwaniidae , Stigmacoccidae and Callipappidae) (Hodgson & Foldi, in press). The tubular ducts on male Matsucoccidae are also restricted to segment VII but males of Matsucoccus species lack loculate pores. The arrangement described here almost certainly applies also to the winged males of M. caucasica , as Hadzibeyli (1965) indicates that there are several times more pores in the anterior group (segment VI) than in the posterior group (segment VII) (ratio of pore/duct frequency 105:30), suggesting that those on segment VI are loculate pores and those on segment VII, tubular ducts.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Marchalina
Hodgson, Chris & Gounari, Sofia 2006 |
Marchalina Vayssière, 1923 : 427
Vayssiere, P. 1923: 427 |