Furcula terminata ( Wiltshire, 1958 )

Morozov, Pavel S., Prozorov, Alexey M., Korb, Stanislav K., Shovkoon, Dmitry F., Gorbunov, Pavel Y., Müller, Günter C., Saldaitis, Aidas & Yakovlev, Roman V., 2023, Notes on Central Asian Furcula with description of a new species, Zootaxa 5319 (3), pp. 373-388 : 375-379

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5319.3.4

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C0CAAC95-97FA-4652-8C17-18533980C37C

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8231221

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6C333644-FF91-FF8B-FF22-FF14FBEAFB9E

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Furcula terminata ( Wiltshire, 1958 )
status

 

Furcula terminata ( Wiltshire, 1958) View in CoL

( Figs 1–35 View FIGURES 1–6 View FIGURES 8–25 View FIGURES 26–35 , 70–72 View FIGURE 70 View FIGURES 71–75 )

Harpyia lanigera forma terminata Wiltshire, 1958 View in CoL , Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society, 55, 231. HT: ♀, “Afganistan, Faizabad, Kokscha valley, 1,450m ” ( ZSM) .

= Furcula gorbunovi Schintlmeister, 1998 View in CoL , syn. n., Entomofauna   GoogleMaps , 19(5), 88. HT: Ô, “Tadshikistan, Gissar Mts., Ramit Nature Reserve, 38°25’ N.B., 69°20’ E.L.” (CASD).

= Furcula mimonovi Schintlmeister, 1998 View in CoL , syn. n., Entomofauna   GoogleMaps , 19(5), 91. HT: Ô, “ Uzbekistan, Karakalpakija, Tachtakupyr, 43°02’ N.B., 60°17’ E.L.” (CASD).

Taxonomic note. 1. Wiltshire (1958) described terminata View in CoL from one female. It has the diagnostic merged spots along the external margin of the forewing ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1–6 ). Wiltshire considered it as an Afghan form of Harpyia lanigera Butler, 1877 which was a taxon then thought to be distributed from northwestern India eastwards to Japan. Later, Daniel (1965) cited the letter from Wiltshire where he mentioned that actually not one but two females were collected by Klapperich in Afghanistan. One with the merged spots, described by Wiltshire as terminata View in CoL , and “The second specimen resembles lanigera completely...” (“Das zweite Stuck gleicht lanigera vollkommen...,” Daniel, 1965: 39). Considering the fact that the two females were collected at the same time and place, Daniel suggested that they are conspecific and the merged spots of the holotype female of terminata View in CoL was just an aberration. Wings shape and coloration reminded him very much of the Georgian Harpyia pulvigera Staudinger, 1901 . But instead of synonymizing terminata View in CoL , he considered it as a local race of pulvigera . Schintlmeister (1989), stated that terminata View in CoL “whether it is a subspecies of its own must remain open for lack of material” and “belongs after the illustration of the original description without any doubt to petri,” meaning Furcula aeruginosa petri Alpheraky, 1882 View in CoL (“Das Taxon terminata View in CoL aus Afghanistan gehört nach der Abbildung der Urbeschreibung zweifelsfrei zu petri. Ob es sich um eine eigene Unterart handelt, muss mangels Material noch offen bleiben,” Schintlmeister, 1989: 82). Finally, nine years later Schintlmeister (1998) raised terminata View in CoL to the status of a valid species after he investigated more adults and their genitalia, although he did not see any additional Afghan material and did not investigate genitalia of the female holotype. He considered the species together with Furcula furcula (Clerk, 1759) View in CoL within the same specific group “characterized by the processes of valvae which are terminating unpointed” ( Schintlmeister, 1998: 79). Schintlmeister also mentioned that the male genitalia of terminata View in CoL are “unlike mimonovi View in CoL ” ( Schintlmeister, 1998: 85).

Below, in the same publication, Schintlmeister (1998) described two new Central Asian species: F. gorbunovi from the mountains of Tajikistan and Uzbekistan and F. mimonovi from the lowlands along the rivers Vakhsh, Amu Darya and Syr Darya. Both were placed into the bifida -group characterized by the pointed apex of costal process of valva. No diagnostic differences between F. gorbunovi and F. mimonovi were mentioned in the original description or later ( Schintlmeister, 2008). We also couldn’t find any stable external characters to distinguish F. gorbunovi ( Figs 17–25 View FIGURES 8–25 ) from F. minonovi ( Figs 8–16 View FIGURES 8–25 ) because of an external variability of specimens collected even in the same localities ( Figs 14–16 View FIGURES 8–25 ). Males from the valleys of Vakhsh, Syr Darya and Amu Darya rivers, Gissar and Darvaz mountains and western Pamir, including the type localities of F. gorbunovi and F. mimonovi , showed no significant differences in genitalia ( Figs 26–31 View FIGURES 26–35 ). Although, we had no males from northeastern Afghanistan at our disposal to compare with F. gorbunovi and F. mimonovi , we did compare the females. Genitalia of the female holotype of F. terminata ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 1–6 ), another female from Afghanistan ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 1–6 ), and paratype female of F. mimonovi ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 1–6 ) are very much alike the females from Uzbekistan ( Fig. 32 View FIGURES 26–35 ), Kazakhstan ( Fig. 33 View FIGURES 26–35 ), and Tajikistan ( Figs 34–35 View FIGURES 26–35 ).

In summary, dissection of the holotype female of F. terminata helped to prove it is conspecific with F. gorbunovi and F. mimonovi ( Fig. 70 View FIGURE 70 , blue), while F. terminata sensu Schintlmeister is described below as Furcula victoria sp. n. ( Fig. 70 View FIGURE 70 , red).

2. The female holotype of F. terminata in the collection of ZSM is mislabeled as “ ssp. nuristana Wiltshire ,” “ Holotype.” The taxon Harpyia pulcherrima nuristana Wiltshire, 1958 was described in the same publication with F. terminata , and it is presently considered to be a synonym of Neoharpyia pulcherrima ( Brandt, 1938) ( Schintlmeister, 1989; 2008). To avoid future misunderstandings, we will add the correct identification label “ Harpyia lanigera f. terminata Wiltshire ” to the female.

Redescription. Male ( Figs 3 View FIGURES 1–6 , 8, 11, 14–17, 21–22 View FIGURES 8–25 ). Flagellum covered with white scales, rami dark brown or black. Head white. Thorax mesally has black and white or brown and white speckled pattern with yellow scales. Abdomen white with brown or black stripes developed between abdominal sclerites or almost completely brown or black. Forewing. Forewing length: 16–19 mm; wingspan: 31–45 mm. Elongated ellipsoid, apex rounded, outer margin smooth. Background color white, yellowish or creamy. Pattern dark brown or black with rare yellow scales, consist of: speckled antemedial band of sand glass shape, sometimes mesally split, laterally accompanied by fragmented lines; discal mark; medial field with more or less developed speckled pattern; doubled crenulated postmedial line; crenulated external line with dark speckled apical field. Fringe white with black spots. Hindwing. Somewhat triangular. Background color white or yellowish with dark discal spot, anal spot and spots present along external margin. Genitalia (Figs 7, 26–31). Uncus beak-shaped with pointed apex, loosely covered with setae. Socii hardly sclerotized and grown together into hoof-shaped structure, loosely covered with setae. Tegumen fused, forming a band. Valva semioval, membranous, unevenly covered with setae of variable length, sacculus sclerotized, costa bears half-connected sclerotized fingerlike ridge with pointed apex. Juxta a band fused to vinculum. Aedeagus sickle-shaped with widened phallobase. Vesica long, spiral, distally narrowed. Eighth sternite oval, caudal margin may have medial concavity. Eighth tergite somewhat oval. Female ( Figs 1–2 View FIGURES 1–6 , 9–10, 12–13, 18–20, 23–25 View FIGURES 8–25 ). Similar to male but bigger and antenna pectinations much shorter. Forewing length: 20–22 mm; wingspan: 36–44 mm. Genitalia ( Fig. 4–6 View FIGURES 1–6 , 32–35 View FIGURES 26–35 ). Papillae anales crescent-shaped, densely covered with setae. Posterior and anterior apophyses short, about the same length. Sterigma hardly sclerotized, lamella antevaginalis somewhat V-shaped with well-developed antrum. Ductus bursae spiral, about the length of corpus bursae. Corpus bursae large, egg-shaped.

Variability. Background color of wings may be white ( Fig. 14 View FIGURES 8–25 ), yellowish ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 8–25 ) or creamy ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 8–25 ); maculation may be black ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 8–25 ) or dark brown ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 8–25 ). Abdomen may have brown stripes ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 8–25 ) or be completely brown ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 8–25 ) or black ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 8–25 ). Antemedial band may be continuous ( Figs 10, 17 View FIGURES 8–25 ) or incomplete ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 8–25 ). Medial field may have almost no pattern ( Figs 12, 20 View FIGURES 8–25 ) or be almost completely black ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 8–25 ).

Diagnosis. Furcula aeruginosa petri ( Figs 51–53 View FIGURES 42–59 ) is smaller than F. terminata ( Figs 8–25 View FIGURES 8–25 ), has shorter forewings and more or less a pronounced creamy background color, while the background color of F. terminata is usually white or yellowish, rarely creamy ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 8–25 ); costal process of valva with dents ( Figs 61–62 View FIGURES 60–69 ), while F. terminata has no dents ( Figs 26–31 View FIGURES 26–35 ); lamella antevaginalis has smaller medial concavity and smaller antrum ( Fig. 67 View FIGURES 60–69 ), while F. terminata has larger antrum ( Figs 32–35 View FIGURES 26–35 ). Furcula bifida ( Figs 54–56 View FIGURES 42–59 ) has a wide antemedial band on forewing and a varying pronounced dark external field on the hindwing, which may be brown, while the antemedial band of F. terminata often narrows medially or is discontinuous and the external field is not as pronounced ( Figs 8–25 View FIGURES 8–25 ); F. bifida has a paired semioval signum ( Fig. 68 View FIGURES 60–69 ), while F. terminata does not ( Figs 32–35 View FIGURES 26–35 ). Furcula danieli ( Figs 57–59 View FIGURES 42–59 ) has a creamy background color instead of white or yellowish of F. terminata ( Figs 8–25 View FIGURES 8–25 ); antrum basally narrower ( Fig. 69 View FIGURES 60–69 ), while in F. terminata it is wider ( Figs 32–35 View FIGURES 26–35 ). Furcula victoria sp. n. ( Figs 36–38 View FIGURES 36–41 , 42–50 View FIGURES 42–59 ) is overall paler than F. terminata ( Figs 8–25 View FIGURES 8–25 ); the costal process of valva with dents ( Figs 39–40 View FIGURES 36–41 ), while that of F. terminata lacks dents ( Figs 26–31 View FIGURES 26–35 ); the lamella antevaginalis has a smaller medial concavity and a smaller antrum ( Figs 41 View FIGURES 36–41 , 66 View FIGURES 60–69 ) than F. terminata ( Figs 32–35 View FIGURES 26–35 ).

Distribution ( Fig. 70 View FIGURE 70 ). Afghanistan, Southern Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan.

Biology. Inhabits various landscapes from lowland riparian woodland up to the mountains along Pyandzh, Amu Darya, and Syr Darya rivers ( Figs 71–72 View FIGURES 71–75 ). Occurs up to 2,210 meters a.s.l. It flies in two generations from April to August in lowlands, while it is likely to be monovoltine in the mountains. Larvae could feed on Salix sp. under lab conditions (recorded for F. mimonovi ; Schintlmeister, 1998).

Examined type material: ♀ holotype of F. terminata, NO Afghanistan, Badakhschan, Kokschatal, Faizabad , 1450 m, 7.VIII.1953, leg. Klapperich, slide Notod-1 ( ZSM) ; Ô, paratype of F. gorbunovi , Tajikistan, Gissar mts, Ramit , 38°25’ N, 69°20’ E, 25.IV.1988, leg. O. Gorbunov ( ZISP) GoogleMaps ; Ô, paratype of F. gorbunovi , Tajikistan, Gissar mts, Ramit , 38°25’ N, 69°20’ E, 25.IV.1988. leg. O. Gorbunov, slide 2022 0122 ( MWM / ZSM) GoogleMaps ; ♀, paratype of F. mimonovi , [ Uzbekistan] Karakalpakia, Takhtakupyr , 08.VI.1988, leg. Mimonov ( ZISP) ; ♀, paratype of F. mimonovi , [ Kazakhstan] Tschimkent, Tschardara, Syrdarya river , 200 m, 22–25.V.1996, leg. V. Lukhtanov, slide 2022 0123 ( MWM / ZSM). Additional material. Kazakhstan: ♀, [Kazakhstan, Kyzylorda] Turkestan , Syr-Darja, Perowsk, slide 1995 ( ZSM) ; Ô, [Kyzylorda] Perovsk, Syrdarya river , 07.IV.1909, leg. E. Miller ( ZMMU) ; ♀, [Kyzylorda] Perovsk, Syrdarya river , 24.04.1909, leg. S.K. Schell ( ZMMU) ; ♀, Baigakum station, Syrdarya river , 19.IV.1908, leg. Malyschew ( ZISP) ; Ô, 40 km SW Turkestan, Syrdarya river, Tugay forest , 05.V.1994, leg. V. Zolotuhin ( CGSP) ; 11Ô, 2♀, Syrdarya river valley, 10 km SE Bairkum village, tugay forest, 42°12’ N, 68°14’ E, 200 m, 16.IV.2018, leg. P. Gorbunov, slides G0271, G0272 ( CPMM) GoogleMaps ; 6Ô, Kyzylorda region, Syrdarya river , 44°24’377” N, 66°16’301” E, 142 m, 25.IV.2017, leg. D. F. Shovkoon, ( CPMM) ; 3Ô, Kyzylorda region, Syrdarya river , 128 m, 44°24’418” N, 66°16’401” E, 25.IV.2019. leg. D. F. Shovkoon ( CPMM) ; 7Ô, [Taraz] Djambul , 24.IV.1986, leg. M. Bouma ( CASD) . Uzbekistan: ♀, Vakhshivar, Baisuntau mts , 1450 m, 2–10.V.1977, leg. A. Nekrasov ( ZISP) ; ♀, [Surkhandarinskyi distr.] Uzun , 30.V.1963 ( ZMMU) ; ♀, Surkhandarinskyi distr., Dzharkurgan , 14.III.2002, leg. O. Legezin ( CGSP) ; 3Ô, 3♀, Karakalpakstan, Takhtakupyr , 18.VI.1984, leg. E.V. Mimonov, slides G0273, G0274 ( CPMM) ; 3♀, West Hissar Gebirge, Sangardak, Denau , 1200 m, 8.V.1999, leg. O. Legezin ( CASD) . Tajikistan: ♀, Gissar Mts, Kondara gorge , 21.VI.1968, leg. A. Tsvetayev ( ZMMU) ; ♀, Yavroz, river Kafirnigan gorge , 1000–1200 m, 20–30.V.1979, leg. A.Nekrasov ( ZISP) ; Ô, ♀, Peter I range, Khingob river , 7 km E Tavildara, 38°43’512” N, 70°32’679” E, 1712 m, 25.V.2017, leg. Benedek & Ilniczky ( CPMM) ; Ô, Darvaz, Gonishou, Darai-Nazarak , 10–11.VI.2011, leg. A. Zubov, slide G0276 ( CPMM) ; ♀, Darvaz, Khozratishoh, Sary-Chashma , 6–9.VIII.2012. leg. O. Legezin, slide G0267 ( CPMM) ; Ô, Ramit , 11.V.1986, leg. A. Devyatkin ( CPMM) ; Ô, ♀, Darvaz, Khozratishoh , 1400 m, 4–7.V.2012, leg. Zubov ( CPMM) ; 4Ô, Darvaz, Peter I range, Childara gorge , 1790 m, 38°50’12” N, 70°19’9” E, 7–8.VII.2019, leg. R. Yakovlev & H. Sulak, slides G0342, G0344, G0345 ( CPMM) GoogleMaps ; 2Ô, Darvaz, Peter I range, Lyulya-Kharvi , 2000 m, 38°51’35” N, 70°48’54” E, 9–10.VII.2019, leg. R. Yakovlev & H. Sulak, slide G0343 ( CPMM) GoogleMaps ; ♀, Western Pamir, Vanch range, Torsher village , 2210 m, 38°32’58” N, 71°45’37” E, 15– 16.07.2019, leg. R. Yakovlev & H. Sulak, slide G0348 ( CPMM) GoogleMaps ; ♀, Tigrovaya Balka nature reserve , 29.IV.1965, leg. A. Tsvetayev ( ZMMU) ; Ô, Khatlon, Vakhsh river, Tigrovaya Balka nature reserve , 37°01’001” N, 68°30’147” E, 327 m, 20.V.2017, leg. Benedek & Ilniczky, slide G0275 ( CPMM); GoogleMaps ♀, Khatlon, Vakhsh river , 5 km NNE Tojikabad village, 37°35’780” N, 68°32’330” E, 363 m, 1.VI.2017. leg. Benedek & Ilniczky slide G0276 ( CPMM) ; ♀ Tajikistan, Vakhsh river , Garauti village, near Tigrovaya Balke reserve, 37°36’ N, 68°32’ E, 250 m, tugay forest, 2.VIII.2013, leg. O. Pak ( CPMM) GoogleMaps ; 3♀, Tigrowaja Balka , 15.VII–25.VIII.2000, leg. A. Bergmann ( CASD) ; ♀, Tigrowaja Balka , 1–10.VIII.2000 ( CASD) ; 10Ô, 4♀, Dushanbe, 1.V.1965, 7.V.1969, 30.VIII.1963, 25.VII.1963, 5.IV.1970, 17.IV.1969, leg. Schyotkin ( CASD) ; 2Ô, Stalinabad , 28.IV.1968, 29.IV.1968, leg. Schyotkin ( CASD) ; ♀, Anzob , viii. 1991, leg. M. Bouma ( CASD) ; Ô, Kondara , 1100 m, 12. viii. 1959, leg. V. Djegraeva ( CASD) ; 2Ô, ♀, Gissar, Gushary , 1350 m, 14.V.1965, 17.VII.1966, leg. Schyotkin ( CASD) ; Ô, Karategin, Schl. Sangikar , 1700 m, 29.V.1972, leg. Schyotkin ( CASD) ; 8 ÔÔ, Khosratishoh Mts., Shuroabad , 2100 m, 38°08’N, 70°E, 4–6.IX.1999, leg. Yu. Shtetkin, genitalia slide GU 76-100 ( CASD) GoogleMaps . Afghanistan: ♀, N Afghanistan, prov. Badakhshan, Khwakhan ( Darvaz ), 1000 m, 31.VII.1972, leg. Brade & Naumann, slide Notod-2 ( ZSM) .

ZISP

Russia, St. Petersburg, Russian Academy of Sciences, Zoological Institute

ZMMU

ZMMU

CPMM

Mozambique, Lourenco Marques, Dr. Alvaro de Castro Provincial Museum

CASD

Canada, Alberta, Edmonton, Canadian On-line Spider Database

ZSM

Bavarian State Collection of Zoology

ZISP

Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences

ZMMU

Zoological Museum, Moscow Lomonosov State University

CPMM

Dr. Alvaro de Castro Provincial Museum

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Lepidoptera

Family

Notodontidae

Genus

Furcula

Loc

Furcula terminata ( Wiltshire, 1958 )

Morozov, Pavel S., Prozorov, Alexey M., Korb, Stanislav K., Shovkoon, Dmitry F., Gorbunov, Pavel Y., Müller, Günter C., Saldaitis, Aidas & Yakovlev, Roman V. 2023
2023
Loc

Furcula gorbunovi

Schintlmeister 1998
1998
Loc

Furcula mimonovi

Schintlmeister 1998
1998
Loc

mimonovi

Schintlmeister 1998
1998
Loc

terminata

Wiltshire 1958
1958
Loc

terminata

Wiltshire 1958
1958
Loc

terminata

Wiltshire 1958
1958
Loc

terminata

Wiltshire 1958
1958
Loc

terminata

Wiltshire 1958
1958
Loc

terminata

Wiltshire 1958
1958
Loc

terminata

Wiltshire 1958
1958
Loc

terminata

Wiltshire 1958
1958
Loc

terminata

Wiltshire 1958
1958
Loc

Harpyia pulvigera

Staudinger 1901
1901
Loc

pulvigera

Staudinger 1901
1901
Loc

Furcula aeruginosa petri

Alpheraky 1882
1882
Loc

Harpyia lanigera

Butler 1877
1877
Loc

Harpyia lanigera

Butler 1877
1877
Loc

lanigera

Butler 1877
1877
Loc

lanigera

Butler 1877
1877
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF