Quedius (Microsaurus) piceolineatus Scheerpeltz, 1965
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2023.864.2093 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D47B6B04-B2AD-4FDD-B7C4-B71CA6A5BB84 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7872305 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6C38C875-FFB8-5B47-FE16-FBA2E1A0FCF9 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Quedius (Microsaurus) piceolineatus Scheerpeltz, 1965 |
status |
|
Quedius (Microsaurus) piceolineatus Scheerpeltz, 1965 View in CoL
Figs 2D View Fig , 6H–J View Fig
Quedius (Microsaurus) piceolineatus Scheerpeltz, 1965: 284 View in CoL .
Diagnosis
Within the Masasatoi group, Q. piceolineatus can be recognized by the pale yellow-orange body and medial darkening on the sutural area of the elytra ( Fig. 2D View Fig ). It is most similar to Q. masasatoi but the latter species is darker, bicolored reddish to orange-yellow and dark-brown ( Fig. 5F View Fig ), with darkened parts of the abdominal tergites. Additionally, the median lobe in ventral view and paramere of Q. masasatoi ( Fig. 6K, M View Fig ) are distinctly more slender than those of Q. piceolineatus ( Fig. 6H, J View Fig ) and the apex of the median lobe in lateral view is broader in Q. masasatoi ( Fig. 6L View Fig ). Quedius masatakai is entirely dark bodied and easily distinguished from pale Q. piceolineatus .
Type material
Holotype
MYANMAR – Kachin State • ♂; “ N.E. Burma , Kambaiti; 2000 m; 14/5.1934; Malaise [printed label] / HOLOTYPUS [red handwritten label] / TYPUS Quedius piceolineatus, O. Scheerpeltz [dark red-pink label] / Quedius (Microsaurus) piceolineatus nov. spec., det. Scheerpeltz [printed label] / 6673 E91 [blue printed label] / piceolineatus Scheerpeltz [large, printed, folded label] / NHRS-JLKB 000021049 ”; NHRS.
Redescription
Rather similar to Q. masasatoi (description in Smetana 2007; supplemented by Smetana 2012a) and differing in the following: paler areas of the body in general lighter, brownish-yellow, abdominal tergites entirely pale; antennomeres 7–10 slightly less transverse but still wider than long; tergites III–IV with median impunctate area; male tergite X very similar but with slightly and minutely emarginate apex; male sternite IX similar but with expanded middle part more symmetrical and elongate basal part shorter and less elongate; median lobe in ventral view shorter and broader, pair of median teeth slightly farther apart ( Fig. 6H View Fig ), median lobe in lateral view more strongly narrowed at apex ( Fig. 6I View Fig ); paramere shorter and more strongly narrowed to apex, which is more rounded, setae on underside in slightly different arrangement ( Fig. 6J View Fig ).
Female
Unknown.
Distribution
Known only from the type locality in Myanmar (Kachin).
Bionomics
Nothing is known about the natural history of this species but the holotype has two deutonymphs of a uropodine mite attached to the pronotum ( Fig. 2D View Fig ).
Remarks
Based on the rather similar male genitalia, slightly emarginate tergite VIII and overall habitus ( Fig. 6H– M View Fig ), Q. piceolineatus is probably the sister species of Q. masasatoi .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Staphylininae |
Tribe |
Quediini |
Genus |
|
SubGenus |
Microsaurus |
Quedius (Microsaurus) piceolineatus Scheerpeltz, 1965
Brunke, Adam James 2023 |
Quedius (Microsaurus) piceolineatus Scheerpeltz, 1965: 284
Scheerpeltz O. 1965: 284 |