Geostiba (Tropogastrosipalia) erecta, Assing, 2009
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5276563 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6D0E87E4-EA0D-6173-44F8-F40EFC2AF990 |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Geostiba (Tropogastrosipalia) erecta |
status |
sp. nov. |
Geostiba (Tropogastrosipalia) erecta View in CoL nov.sp. ( Figs 24-31 View Figs 24-31 )
Holotype Ƌ: "N 36°25'01 E 036°06'40, TR Hatay Kizildag , E Madenli, 1120 m, 11.4.2009, Brachat & Meybohm / Holotypus Ƌ Geostiba erecta sp. n. det. V. Assing 2009" (cAss) . Paratypes: 4♀♀: same data as holotype (cAss).
D e s c r i p t i o n: Body length 2.8-3.2 mm. Habitus as in Fig. 24 View Figs 24-31 . Coloration: head dark-brown to blackish; pronotum and elytra reddish to dark-brown; abdomen brown, with segments VI-VII dark-brown, or completely dark-brown to blackish-brown; legs yellowish; antennae brown to dark-brown, usually with antennomeres I-II at least slightly paler.
Head 1.00-1.09 times as long as wide ( Figs 25, 27 View Figs 24-31 ); punctation extremely fine, barely noticeable; surface with very shallow microreticulation. Eyes relatively small, 0.30-0.45 times as long as postocular region in dorsal view.
Pronotum without apparent sexual dimorphism ( Figs 25, 27 View Figs 24-31 ), approximately 1.05 times as wide as long, posterior margin in both sexes weakly and broadly convex, in the middle almost truncate; punctation extremely fine, barely noticeable; microreticulation somewhat more distinct than that of head.
Elytra with moderately pronounced sexual dimorphism, 0.6-0.7 times as long as pronotum ( Figs 25, 27 View Figs 24-31 ); punctation in both sexes fine, not granulose; microsculpture very shallow, less pronounced than that of pronotum. Hind wings reduced.
Abdomen ( Fig. 28 View Figs 24-31 ) usually at least slightly wider than elytra; punctation moderately fine and sparse; microreticulation distinct; posterior margin of tergite VII usually with narrow rudiment of a palisade fringe; tergites IV and V without, VII with sexual dimorphism; posterior margin of tergite VIII weakly convex in both sexes.
Ƌ (with fully developed secondary sexual characters): elytra with pair of erect tubercles near apex of scutellum ( Fig. 26 View Figs 24-31 ), surface without distinct impressions; abdominal tergite VII with long, slender, remarkably erect, and apically acute spine-like process at posterior margin ( Fig. 29 View Figs 24-31 ); median lobe of aedeagus with very slender cristal process ( Fig. 30 View Figs 24-31 ).
♀: spermatheca not distinctive ( Fig. 31 View Figs 24-31 ).
E t y m o l o g y: The name (Latin, adjective) alludes to the erect tubercles on the male elytra and the erect process of the male abdominal tergite VII.
C o m p a r a t i v e n o t e s: Using the key in ASSING (2005a), the new species would key out at couplets 84-86, together with the geographically close G. simulans PACE 1983 ( Hatay) , G. marasica ASSING 2004 (Kahramanmaraş) , G. hamata ASSING 2003 ( Hatay) , and G. adunca ASSING 2004 (Kahramanmaraş) . It is distinguished from all these species particularly by the erect tubercles on the male elytra, as well as by the shape of the process of the male tergite VII. It is additionally separated from G. simulans and G. marasica by the absence of a dimorphism of the male pronotum and from G. hamata and G. adunca by the short and very slender cristal process of the median lobe of the aedeagus. For illustrations of G. simulans , G. marasica , G. hamata , and G. adunca see PACE (1983b) and ASSING (2003, 2004a), respectively.
D i s t r i b u t i o n a n d b i o n o m i c s: Thespeciesisprobablyendemictothe Kızıl Dağı in western Hatay province, central southern Anatolia. The type specimens were collected by sifting litter and by turning stones at an altitude of 1120 m.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.