Microplitis vitellipedis Li, Tan & Song
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3963.3.4 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C543FC96-D621-4BAD-8746-ED14E447F948 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5668942 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6E2F87FE-FFD6-FF9D-3DF0-9B9478AEDA9B |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Microplitis vitellipedis Li, Tan & Song |
status |
|
Microplitis vitellipedis Li, Tan & Song
Microplitis vitellipedis Li, Tan & Song 2009 ; 225–229. Holotype HAU.
Material examined. 1♂ India, Kerala, Mukkali, no collection date, Sheeba ( DZUC).
Female. Body length 2.2 mm.
Head: Head 2× as wide as long in dorsal view; face transverse, 1.2× as wide as high; vertex slightly micropunctate ( Fig. 21 View FIGURE 21 -B); upper half of the temple densely punctate; ocelli small forming high triangle ( Fig. 21 View FIGURE 21 - B); inner margin of eyes nearly parallel sided, densely setose; POL 0.9× OOL; antennae 1.4× as long as body; first flagellomere as long as second flagellomere, 2.9× as long as wide; second flagellomere 2.5× as long as wide; terminal flagellomere acute, 3.1× as long as wide.
Mesosoma: Mesosoma 1.4× as long as high; mesoscutum unevenly punctate ( Fig. 21 View FIGURE 21 -B); notauli distinctly impressed, densely punctate, meeting posteriorly to form a slightly sunken rugose area ( Fig. 21 View FIGURE 21 -B); medial furrow narrow, distinct; scutellar lunules divided by five carinae; scutellum densely punctate ( Fig. 21 View FIGURE 21 -C); propodeum coarsely reticulate-rugose with percurrent medial longitudinal carina ( Fig. 21 View FIGURE 21 -C); pronotum flat, rugose punctate with upper pronotal groove absent, hind coxa smooth, setose; hind femur 3.8× as long as wide; hind tibia 6.8× as long as wide; outer hind tibial spur 0.4× as long as basitarsus.
Wings: Fore wing 2.8× as long as wide ( Fig. 21 View FIGURE 21 -F); pterostigma 2.6× as long as wide ( Fig. 21 View FIGURE 21 -F); 1-M slightly arched throughout; areolet medium sized, distinctly quadrangular ( Fig. 21 View FIGURE 21 -F); distance from apex of 1-R1 to wing apex equal to vein 1-R1; 1-R1 1.6× as long as pterostigma; margin of vannal lobe convex, setose.
Metasoma: T1 subparallel sided, 1.6–1.8× as long as basal width, finely rugose, slightly depressed base and apical swelling smooth ( Fig. 21 View FIGURE 21 -C & D); suture between T3 and T2 nearly reduced to indistinct depression, without median field; T3 1.3× as long as T 2 in medial line; T3 and following tergites smooth, shining with sparse pilosity ( Fig. 21 View FIGURE 21 -E); hypopygium small.
Colour: Black, antennae yellowish brown but scape mostly yellowish, only a small area anteriorly reddish brown, maxillary and labial palps, tibial spurs and in proximal 2/5 of hind tibia whitish yellow, pterostigma and most veins yellowish brown but basal veins pale brown ( Fig. 21 View FIGURE 21 -F), first discal cell of fore wing and above areolet with pale brown areas, legs rather yellow but hind coxae reddish yellow, hind femur yellowish brown, tip of hind tibia and tarsus greyish brown, T1 dark reddish yellow to brown, laterotergites pale yellow, rest reddish yellow to reddish brown.
Male: Unknown.
Distribution. China (Fujian) and India (Kerala).
Host. Unknown.
Discussion. This species is close to M. chui in having the pronotum coarsely rugose-punctate, propodeum with indistinct anterior transverse carina, face 1.2× as wide as long, T1 sub parallel sided narrowing posteriorly and T2 without distinct median field. It differs from M. chui in the following characters: scutellar lunules divided by five carinae (in M. chui scutellar lunules divided by six carinae), scutellum micropunctured (in M. chui scutellum coarsely rugose), face punctate (in M. chui face rugose), POL 1.1× OOL (in M. chui POL 0.7× OOL), T1 1.7× as long as wide (in M. chui T1 2× as long as wide), fore wing vein 1-R1 1.6× as long as pterostigma (in M. chui 1-R1 2.9× as long as pterostigma).
Comments. We used detailed images taken from examined material and the type specimens of this species could not be examined.
DZUC |
Departamento de Zoologia da Universidade de Coimbra |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Microplitis vitellipedis Li, Tan & Song
Ranjith, A. P., Rajesh, K. M. & Nasser, M. 2015 |
Microplitis vitellipedis
Li, Tan & Song 2009 |