Dicotylophyllum sp.

Kovar-Eder, Johanna, Kvaček, Zlatko, Teodoridis, Vasilis, Mazouch, Petr & Collinson, Margaret E., 2022, Floristic, Vegetation And Climate Assessment Of The Early / Middle Miocene Parschlug Flora Indicates A Distinctly Seasonal Climate, Fossil Imprint 78 (1), pp. 80-144 : 93

Dicotylophyllum sp. X

Pl. 6, Figs 2, 3

M a t e r i a l. IBUG 1271 + 1272 (part + counterpart),

NHMW 1878/6/7787.

D e s c r i p t i o n. Leaves petiolate; lamina elliptic, l × w about 30–34 × 14–18 mm, ratio l/w about 1.7–2.4, base convex to cuneate, apex not preserved; margin entire; venation almost basally acrodromous; midvein and secondaries rather thin; midvein straight; lateral primaries reaching only to about middle of lamina, looping with secondaries near margin; secondaries widely spaced, the first pair originating at a wide distance from lateral primaries; composite intersecondaries thin and short; tertiaries and higher order veins forming polygonal meshes.

Differing from “ Celastrus ” europaea and Daphnogene polymorpha see those taxa.

Dicotylophyllum sp. Y Pl. 6, Fig. 4

M a t e r i a l. IBUG 1410 + 1411 (part + counterpart).

D e s c r i p t i o n. Leaf lacking petiole; lamina elliptic,

l × w = 19 × 9 mm, ratio l/w = 2.1, base widely cuneate, apex acute; margin entire basally, indistinctly crenulate-serrate apically, teeth blunt, probably glanduliferous; midvein straight; secondaries hardly visible.

R e m a r k s. This specimen is reminiscent of smallleaved Vaccinioideae.

Differing from Dicotylophyllum sp. 3 and Dicotylophyllum sp. F see those taxa.

Differing from Dicotylophyllum sp. II by indistinct secondaries and tertiaries.