Crassignatha seeliam, Rivera-Quiroz & Petcharad & Miller, 2021

Rivera-Quiroz, Francisco Andres, Petcharad, Booppa & Miller, Jeremy A., 2021, First records and three new species of the family Symphytognathidae (Arachnida, Araneae) from Thailand, and the circumscription of the genus Crassignatha Wunderlich, 1995, ZooKeys 1012, pp. 21-53 : 21

publication ID

https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1012.57047

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:4B5ACAB0-5322-4893-BC53-B4A48F8DC20C

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/DA61A955-A1D4-4B7D-A7A0-89AD024460A3

taxon LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:act:DA61A955-A1D4-4B7D-A7A0-89AD024460A3

treatment provided by

ZooKeys by Pensoft

scientific name

Crassignatha seeliam
status

sp. nov.

Crassignatha seeliam sp. nov. Figures 4a-c View Figure 4 , 5b, d View Figure 5 , 6a, b View Figure 6 , 10 View Figure 10 , 11 View Figure 11 , 12 View Figure 12

Material examined.

Holotype: Thailand • ♂: Chiang Mai, Doi Inthanon National Park. Montane evergreen forest; 18°30.454'N, 98°30.584'E. 1605 m; July 21-24, 2018; Booppa Petcharad, Jeremy Miller, F. Andres Rivera-Quiroz leg.; direct hand coll.; RMNH.ARA.18444. Paratypes: Thailand • ♀ allotype; same data as holotype • 8 ♀; same data as holotype; RMNH.5106641• ♂ and ♀ Chiang Mai, Doi Suthep National Park. Montane evergreen forest with pine; 18°48.502'N, 98°53.528'E. 1409 m; July 24-28, 2018; same collectors as holotype; pitfall traps. RMNH.ARA.18445.

Etymology.

The species epithet is a derivation of the Thai seeliam (square), in reference to the shape of the abdomen in dorsal view.

Diagnosis.

Distinguished from other Crassignatha species except Crassignatha quadriventris (Lin & Li, 2009) by the semi-squared posterior of the abdomen in dorsal view (Figs 10b View Figure 10 , 11b View Figure 11 ). Female can be separated from C. quadriventris by the coiling of the copulatory ducts in the epigynum (compare Figs 11d View Figure 11 and 12c, d View Figure 12 to Lin and Li 2009: fig. 10). Male differs on the size of tegular sclerites and the cymbial tooth being short and stout instead of hook-shaped (compare Figs 10c, d View Figure 10 and 12a, b View Figure 12 to Lin and Li 2009: fig. 8).

Description.

Carapace coloration orange-brown covered by small tubercles (Figs 6a, b View Figure 6 , 10a, b View Figure 10 , 11a, b View Figure 11 ). Legs same color, slightly darker on distal portion its segments. Male Tibia II with two spines (mating claspers) (Fig. 5d View Figure 5 ). Abdomen black with light red patches; squared posteriorly, with sparse sclerotized patches, some bearing long setae (Figs 10b View Figure 10 , 11b View Figure 11 ). Male with posterior scutum wrapping the abdomen. Male palp: slightly less sclerotized than carapace. Semicircular from ventral view (Figs 10c View Figure 10 , 12a View Figure 12 ). Cymbium with distal tooth. Median apophysis as big as Ct (Fig. 12a View Figure 12 ). Embolus filiform, exposed when palp is expanded (Fig. 12c View Figure 12 ). Spermatic duct very long and coiling 2 × inside the bulb (Fig. 4b, c View Figure 4 ).

Vulva: Epigynum with wide scape directed ventrally, heavily sclerotized at the tip (Fig. 11c View Figure 11 ). Copulatory opening at the tip of scape (Figs 11d View Figure 11 , 12c, d View Figure 12 ). Spermathecae spherical, slightly more sclerotized than epigynum, separated by ca. 2 × their diameter (Fig. 11d View Figure 11 ). Copulatory ducts very long, coiling over themselves before connecting to S. Fertilization ducts as long as S width, projecting dorsally (figs 11d View Figure 11 , 12c View Figure 12 ).

Male: Total length 0.68; carapace 0.36 long, 0.30 wide; clypeus 0.13; Chelicera 0.1 long, 0.07 wide; Leg I: femur 0.28, patella 0.12, tibia 0.37, metatarsus 0.17, tarsus 0.22; leg formula I-II-IV-III; abdomen 0.42 long, 0.38 wide.

Female: Total length 0.69, carapace 0.44 long, 0.39 wide; clypeus 0.12; Chelicera 0.15 long, 0.1 wide; Leg I: femur 0.42, patella 0.15, tibia 0.53, metatarsus 0.22, tarsus 0.27; leg formula I-II-IV-III abdomen 0.44 long, 0.43 wide.