Ovalona glabra ( Sars, 1901 ) Sars, 1901

Sinev, Artem Y., 2015, Revision of the pulchella - group of Alona s. lato leads to its translocation to Ovalona Van Damme et Dumont, 2008 (Branchiopoda: Anomopoda: Chydoridae), Zootaxa 4044 (4), pp. 451-492 : 477-478

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4044.4.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:58357227-54BB-4B37-9B03-5E8BBA9C5AC2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5669129

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6F37F264-FFDD-FFE6-FF4B-8726FC798416

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Ovalona glabra ( Sars, 1901 )
status

comb. nov.

XIV. Ovalona glabra ( Sars, 1901) comb. nov.

( Figs. 8 View FIGURE 8. A – D I–M)

Richard, 1897: 289–290, Fig. 35–36 ( Alona cambouei ); Sars, 1901: 49–51, PL. IX, Figs. 6, 6a View FIGURE 6. A – E ( Alona ); Daday, 1905: 173–174, Taf. XI, Fig. 3–4 View FIGURE 3 View FIGURE 4 ( Alona ); Delachaux 1919: 28, Pl. 2, Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 ( Alona cambouei ); Harding 1955:. 343–344, Figs. 61–64 ( Alona cambouei ); Ueno, 1967: 559, Fig. 35–36 ( Alona cambouei ); Megard, 1967: Fig. 29–32 ( Alona pulchella ); Infante, 1980: 598–599, Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5. A – H ,a–c ( Alona pulchella ); Albertina Kameya 1986:135–136, Fig. 6–7 View FIGURE 6. A – E View FIGURE 7. A – B ( Alona ); Sinev 2001a: 203–280, Figs 1 View FIGURE 1 –40 ( Alona ); Elmoor-Loureiro et al. 2004: 417, Figs 12–13.( Alona ); Kotov, Sinev & Berrios, 2010: 33 ( Alona ); Sinev & Silva-Brian, 2012: 13–14, Fig.7A View FIGURE 7. A – B –G ( Alona ).

Type locality. Argentina, Sars (1901) did not give more detailed data on location

Type material. Lectotype (established by Sinev, 2001a): adult female from Argentina, precise location unknown, from G. 0. Sars collection, ZMOU, F12326a. Paralectotypes: 40 females from the same location, together with numerous deformed specimens and exuviae, ZMOU, F12326b.

Material studied earlier. See Sinev (2001a) for the list of material from Argentina and Brazil, Kotov et al. (2010) for material from Chilean Andes; Sinev & Silva-Briano (2012) for material from Mexico.

Diagnosis. Parthenogenetic female. General. Length of adult 0.35–0.46 mm. Body regular oval, height/ length ratio about 0.58–0.62, maximum height at the middle. Ventral margin with about 40–50 setae. Posterodorsal angle with about 60 setulae not organized into groups.

Head. Posterior part of headshield broadly rounded, sometimes with notch at the middle. Three major head pores with connection between them, PP = 0.3–0.5 IP. Lateral head pores minute.

Labrum of moderate size, labral keel broad, with convex anterior margin and a rounded apex; posterior margin of keel without clusters of setulae.

Second abdominal segment without dense setulae. Postabdomen narrow, with parallel margins in postanal portion, length about 2.8–3 height. Distal margin straight; dorso-distal angle prominent, acute with rounded tip. Dorsal margin with distal part about 2 times longer than preanal one; postanal part 1.5 longer than anal one. Postanal portion of distal margin almost straight, anal portion weakly concave. Preanal angle well-defined, postanal angle weakly defined. 7–8 marginal denticles, evenly decreasing in size basally and with 3–5 groups of marginal setulae on anal margin. Eight-nine wide, closely spaced lateral fascicles of setulae, in postanal portion; longest setule in each fascicle as long as longest marginal denticles. Postabdominal claw slightly longer than preanal portion of postabdomen. Basal spine about 0.2 length of claw.

Antennule with antennular seta of half length of antennule, arising at 2/3 distance from the base. Aesthetascs of different length, two longest of them of about half length of antennule.

Antenna with seta arising from basal segment of endopodite reaching the end of endopodite. Spine on basal segment of exopodite slightly shorter than middle segment. Spines on apical segments slightly longer than apical segments.

Limb I with accessory seta about 1/4 length of ODL seta. Limb III with exopodite seta 3 being longest; setae 4 and 6 about 1/3 and 2/5 length of seta 3, respectively; other setae shorter. Limb IV with epipodite with very short projection. Exopodite seta 3 longest; setae 1 slightly shorter than seta 3; seta 2 about 2/3 length of seta 3; seta 5 about 1/2 length of seta 3; setae 4 and 6 shorter than seta 5. Flaming-torch setae with reduced distal portion. Limb V with epipodite with short projection. Exopodite seta 4 four times shorter than seta 1.

Ephippial female with body higher than in parthenogenetic female, ephippium yellow-brown.

Male. General. Length 0.32–0.34 mm. Body low oval, maximum height in the middle of the body, height/ length ratio about 0.58–0.6.

Postabdomen short, narrowing distally; dorso-distal angle rounded, weakly protruding. Length about 2.6 maximum widths. Postanal angle not defined, preanal angle weakly-defined. Distal part of postabdomen 1.5 times longer than preanal one. Gonopores located almost at the end of postabdomen. Unlike in other species of the genus, marginal setulae of postabdomen quite long. Postabdominal claw very short, 2 times shorter than preanal portion of postabdomen; basal spine long, about 0.4 of claw length.

Antennule with male seta arising at 1/4 length from tip, about 1/5 of antennule length.

Limb I with IDL seta 1 absent; setae 2 and 3 subequal in length, two times shorter and thinner than in female; male seta large, hook-like, 1.5 times longer than seta 3. A row of about 11–12 short, robust setulae on ventral face of limb below copulatory brush.

Full description. See Sinev (2001a).

Differential diagnosis. O. glabra is a sibling-species to O. cambouei and O. pulchella . It differs from O. cambouei by connected head pores, and from O. pulchella by the posterior margin of headshield without notches (or, rarely, with single notch at the middle), and by male postabdomen with rectangular distal portion and long marginal setulae. O. glabra differs from O. bromelicola and O. karelica by long basal spine of postabdominal claw; from O. aguascalientensis and O. capensis by fully connected head pores; and from O. archeri by postanal marginal denticles of postabdomen evenly decreasing in size basally.

Distribution. Common in Neotropics ( Sinev 2001a; Elías-Gutiérrez et al. 2006), distributed from Argentina to Mexico and South-East USA, present in Andes (Kotov et al., 2010).

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF