Iranotelmatoscopus kenyensis Ježek & Oboňa, 2019
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4577.1.4 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D77CC9E4-813E-4ABD-81BA-F1AC9F82926D |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5940867 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/710187C2-E91F-CB20-EBE1-F8F085F7FE82 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Iranotelmatoscopus kenyensis Ježek & Oboňa |
status |
sp. nov. |
Iranotelmatoscopus kenyensis Ježek & Oboňa sp. nov.
( Figs. 34–55 View FIGURES 34–40 View FIGURES 41–48 View FIGURES 49–55 , 57 View FIGURES 56–57 )
Description. Male. Head almost rounded from frontal view (1.1 times as broad as long). Vertex with raised
inconspicuous tubercle dorsally and C-shaped compound eyes laterally ( Fig. 34 View FIGURES 34–40 ). Posteriolateral margins of eyes without enlarged alveoli of supraocular bristles on both sides. Eyes separated, eye bridge divided by one facet diameter ( Fig. 34 View FIGURES 34–40 ) and formed by 3 facet rows ( Fig. 35 View FIGURES 34–40 ). Ratio of distances of apices of eyes (tangential points) to facet diameter 10:1. Dorsal and ventral apices of eyes are almost of the same size, only ventrally a little narrower. Hairs of frons are sporadic ( Figs. 34, 35 View FIGURES 34–40 ). Scar patch of frontoclypeus as well as above the upper apices of eyes is continuous, not divided in vertical axis by a median scar-free band. Antennae incomplete ( Fig. 42 View FIGURES 41–48 ). Scape almost cylindrical, 2.2 times as long as pedicel which is globular. Basal flagellomeres pitcher-shaped, bulbose part asymmetrical in horizontal axis (against postpedicel), necks (internodes) represent 1/3 of the length of article. Ascoids simple, digitate, paired ( Fig. 42 View FIGURES 41–48 ). Mouthparts not extending beyond basal palp segment ( Fig. 34 View FIGURES 34–40 ). Labellum bulbose, with digital protuberances in between ( Fig. 43 View FIGURES 41–48 ), miniature spines between both lobes are not developed. Length ratio of maxillary palps 1.0:1.1:1.3:1.5, segment 4 not annulate ( Fig. 36 View FIGURES 34–40 ). Ratio of maximum length of cibarium to length of epipharynx 1.3:1 ( Fig. 34 View FIGURES 34–40 ), labrum pointed ( Fig. 49 View FIGURES 49–55 ).
Thorax. Anepisternum setae patch elliptic, anepimeron with almost circular setose patch ( Fig. 37 View FIGURES 34–40 ). Spiracles set low on mesothorax, closely separated from anterior region of anepisternite. No thoracic allurement organs. Wings ( Fig. 57 View FIGURES 56–57 ) lanceolate, 1.6 mm long - holotype, paratypes 1.5–2.0 mm, rounded distally, not expanded at the posterior margin. The ending of R 5 a little beyond the tip of wing. Wing membrane slightly infuscated and ends of all veins are a little strengthened distally with dark spots. R 1 proximally very weakened. Following veins or their parts strengthened: Sc, with conspicuously marked last third; R 2 and R 5 basally; M 3 in 2/3 of the length; CuA 2 in the middle conspicuously and gradually to basal part with lesser intensity. Radial and medial forks complete, their position see on Fig. 57 View FIGURES 56–57 . Both forks and the ending of CuA 2 are in one line (central area of wing). Wing indices AB:AC:AD = 3.8:3.8:4.2; BC:CD:BD = 1.0:1.2:2.2. Wing index 2.6, medial wing angle 180° (BCD). Halteres ( Fig. 38 View FIGURES 34–40 ) almost spatula-shaped with a prolonged stem. Ratio of maximum length of halteres to their maximum width approximately 2.5:1. Ratios of lengths of femora, tibiae and first tarsal segments P 1 2.1:2.5:1.0, P 2 2.5:3.1:1.4, P 3 2.6:3.1:1.3. Paired tarsal claws of P 1 bent distad, with two ventral thickening ( Fig. 50 View FIGURES 49–55 ).
Male genitalia. Ejaculatory apodeme longly U-shaped with three conspicuously sclerotised ribs distally ( Fig.40 View FIGURES 34–40 ). Aedeagal complex flanked by jointed needle-shaped moveable appendages approximately of the same length as aedeagus which is racquet-shaped, clearly symmetrical, with conspicuous flaps on both sides. Gonostyli gradually tapering to tips, 1.2 times as long as gonocoxites which are cylindrical and a little bent ( Figs. 39 View FIGURES 34–40 , 44 View FIGURES 41–48 ). Epandrium trapezoidal, with two patches of hairs distally ( Figs. 51, 52 View FIGURES 49–55 ), central aperture doubled. Ventral plate was not observed. Hypandrium stripe-shaped, inconspicuously strengthened medially ( Figs. 40 View FIGURES 34–40 , 52 View FIGURES 49–55 ). Hypoproct and epiproct are tongue-shaped, both parts haired ( Fig. 51 View FIGURES 49–55 ). Hypoproct is almost triangular, with miniature microsetae, epiproct approximately semicircular, longly setose. Epandrial clasping lobes almost cylindrical, a little strengthened basally, haired and inconspicuously bent ( Figs. 51, 52 View FIGURES 49–55 ), 1.8 times as long as epandrium ( Fig. 52 View FIGURES 49–55 ), with 12–13 tenacula, frayed apically ( Fig. 51 View FIGURES 49–55 ).
Female. Head with eyes separated, formed by 3 facet rows and frons 1.5 times wider than facet diameter ( Fig. 41 View FIGURES 41–48 ). Wings approximately similar to males, paratypes 1.9–2.2 mm long, allotype 1.9. Wing index 3.0. Ratios of lengths of femora, tibiae and first tarsal segments P 1 1.9:2.0:1.0, P 2 2.2:2.9:1.3, P 3 2.2:3.1:1.3. Ovipositor 2.8 times as long as basis ( Fig. 55 View FIGURES 49–55 ), a little bent, paired cerci with rounded ending and an inner folding membrane ( Fig. 54 View FIGURES 49–55 ). Subgenital plate ( Figs. 46, 47 View FIGURES 41–48 , 53 View FIGURES 49–55 ) V-shaped, bilobed distally with very deep caudal concavity and prolonged basis in a horizontal axis, generally almost elliptic, of which sides are triangular (right angle). Setae are not developed near margins of basal elliptic part in contrast to distal one, which has numerous microsetae. Sensory organ developed, digitate. A trapezoidal tablet inside of genital chamber not developed and lateral inner lobuli are almost oblong-shaped distally. Genital chamber ( Figs. 47, 48 View FIGURES 41–48 , 53 View FIGURES 49–55 ) from dorsal view with two pointed stilts proximally.
Differential diagnosis. Iranotelmatoscopus kenyensis sp. nov. is morphologically similar to I. hajiabadi Ježek, 1987 , however, male characters are quite different: index of distance of tangential points of apices of eyes to facet diameter 10.0 ( Fig. 34 View FIGURES 34–40 ), length ratio of maxillary palps 1.0:1.1:1.3:1.5 ( Fig. 36 View FIGURES 34–40 ), last segment of maxillary palp not annulate ( Fig. 36 View FIGURES 34–40 ), medial wing angle 180° ( Fig. 57 View FIGURES 56–57 ), wing index 2.6 ( Fig. 57 View FIGURES 56–57 ), sclerotized ribs of ejaculatory apodeme distally in number three ( Fig. 40 View FIGURES 34–40 ), conspicuous flaps on both sides of racquet-shaped aedeagus developed ( Figs. 40 View FIGURES 34–40 , 45 View FIGURES 41–48 ) and doubled epandrial aperture ( Fig. 51 View FIGURES 49–55 ). Female characters are as follows (see only Fig. 47 View FIGURES 41–48 ): digital sensory organ of subgenital plate developed, performed trapezoidal tablet of subgenital plate not developed, lateral inner lobuli distally oblong-shaped and proximal stils of genital chamber from dorsal view in number two.
On the other hand, males of I. hajiabadi have index of distance of tangential points of apices of eyes to facet diameter 7.6, length ratio of maxillary palps 1.0:1.2:1.4:2.1, last segment of maxillary palp annulate, medial wing angle 199.5°, wing index 2.2, sclerotized ribs of ejaculatory apodeme distally in number two, conspicuous flaps on both sides of racquet-shaped aedeagus not developed and single epandrial aperture.
Female characters are: digital sensory organ of subgenital plate not developed in contrast to presence of perforated trapezoidal tablet of subgenital plate, lateral inner lobuli distally tongue-shaped and only one proximal stil of genital chamber from dorsal view.
Type material. Holotype ♂: Equatorial Africa : Kenya, Nyangera, Victoria Lake environment, 1 141 m a.s.l. ( Fig. 59 View FIGURE 59 ), 0°3ꞌ 56.296ꞌ ꞌ S, 34°4ꞌ 53.251ꞌ ꞌ E, 6.xii.2003 – 3.iii.2004, Malaise trap, I. Přikryl et al. leg. Slide with a dissected specimen, Cat. No. 34759, Inv. No. 24220 ( NMPC).
Paratypes 6 ♂, 5 ♀ (slides): The same locality, method, collector and date, Cat. No. 34760–34770, Inv. No. 24221–24231, the last two series numbers represent allotype (all NMPC). Supplemented paratypes 5 ♂, 5 ♀ (slides): same, 14.ix.–10.x.2003, Cat. No. 34771–34780, Inv. No. 24232–24241 ( NMPC). Additional paratypes 5 ♂, 5 ♀ (slides): same, 10.x.–6.xii.2003, Cat. No. 34781–34790, Inv. No. 24242–24251 ( NMPC). Another paratypes : 2 ♂, 6 ♀ (slides): Kenya, Kusa , Victoria Lake environment, 1 146 m a.s.l., 0°19ꞌ 25.799ꞌ ꞌ S, 34°50ꞌ 11.561ꞌ ꞌ E, Malaise trap, I. Přikryl et al. leg., 14.ix.–4.x.2003, Cat. No. 34791–34798, Inv. No. 24252– 24259 ( NMPC). Different paratypes : 5 ♀ (slides), same, 26.xii.2003 – 4.iv.2004, Cat. No. 34799–34803, Inv. No. 24260–24264 ( NMPC). In addition, one male paratype from Uganda, Gaba, Victoria Lake environment, 1 137 m a.s.l. ( Figs. 58 View FIGURE 58 , 60 View FIGURE 60 ), 0°14ꞌ 59.763ꞌ ꞌ S, 32°38ꞌ 13.318ꞌ ꞌ E, Malaise trap, I. Přikryl et al. leg., 17.vii.–20.viii.2004, Cat. No. 34804, Inv. No. 24265 ( NMPC). Above mentioned slides are often with dissected specimens .
Type locality. Equatorial Africa: Kenya, Nyangera, Victoria Lake environment.
Etymology. The new species name is the Latinized adjective kenyensis (-is, -e) based on the country of origin.
Bionomics. Unknown. Adults were collected in wetland rushes of margins of the water body with rapidly growing Cyperus papyrus L. ( Fig. 58 View FIGURE 58 ).
Distribution. This species is known only from Equatorial Africa—Kenya and Uganda.
NMPC |
National Museum Prague |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |