Nippobodidae

Chen, Jun & Wang, Hui-Fu, 2007, Taxonomic study on the family Nippobodidae (Acari: Oribatida) from China, Zootaxa 1464, pp. 45-63 : 61-62

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.176507

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6240450

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/721787D5-FFFE-FF8D-F58E-E0296C98E58E

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Nippobodidae
status

 

Key to the genera and species of the family Nippobodidae View in CoL

1. Prodorsal condyles interlocking medially .................................................Genus Leobodes Aoki, 1965 View in CoL ... 2

- Prodorsal condyles well separated from each other...............................Genus Nippobodes Aoki, 1959 View in CoL ... 7

2. Prodorsal condyles forming large ring anterior to interlocking region ....................................................... 3

- Prodorsal condyles not forming ring anterior to interlocking region ......................................................... 4

3. Prodorsal ring heart-shaped; setae c not forked; setae ro inserted laterally. 663–745X408–485Μm ............ ................................................................................................................................ L. annulatus Aoki, 1965

- Prodorsal ring elliptical; setae c forked; setae ro inserted dorsally. 628X430Μm ......... L. yinae Aoki, 2000 View in CoL

4. Prodorsal condyles slender and transverse ridge-like; notogastral setae short and slightly swollen distally; setae c straight; body relatively large. 850–875 X 550–590Μm ........................... L. lijiangensis Aoki, 2000 View in CoL

- Prodorsal condyles thick and massive; notogastral setae long and pointed; setae c curved; body relatively small (body length under 700Μm) ............................................................................................................... 5

5. Distance between intersections of inner margins of prodosal and humeral condyles clearly shorter than vertical distance between intersection of posterior margins of prodorsal condyles and anterior margin of notogaster. 540–582 X 376–412Μm .......................................................................... L. mirabilis Aoki, 1965 View in CoL

- Distance between intersections of inner margins of prodorsal and humeral condyles distinctly longer than vertical distance between intersection of posterior margins of prodorsal condyles and anterior margin of

notogaster..................................................................................................................................................... 6 6. Anterior margin of prodorsal condyles arched; prodorsal setae smooth, arched transverse ridge connecting insertions of le indented medially; notogaster with distinct irregular longitudinal ridges. 645 X 450Μm.... ..................................................................................................................................... L. carinatus View in CoL sp. nov.

- Anterior margin of prodorsal condyles concave medially, almost U-shaped; prodorsal setae ro, le and in slightly barbed distally, arched transverse ridge connecting insertions of le without indentation; surface of notogaster smooth. 665 X 420Μm .......................................................................... L. praeconcavus View in CoL sp. nov.

7. Notogastral setae 8 pairs, setae h2 and p2 absent. 748–824 X 496–568Μm ........... N. chejuensis Choi, 1996 View in CoL

- Notogastral setae 9 or 10 pairs, setae h2 and p2 present ............................................................................... 8

8. Notogastral setae 9 pairs, seta c absent. 810 X 580Μm ............................................... N. latus ( Aoki, 1970) View in CoL

- Notogastral setae 10 pairs, seta c present .................................................................................................... 9

9. Notogastral setae relatively long (RLN* 40–65, seta lm of N. monstruosus View in CoL excluded), flagellate (except seta la straight and acuminate) .................................................................................................................. 10

- Notogastral setae relatively short (RLN under 40), not curved or flagellate, seta la subequal in shape and length to other notogastral setae ................................................................................................................ 11

10. Tip of tutorium blunt; seta lm long, flagellate; seta ad3 relatively short. 540–665 X 375–515Μm ............... ..................................................................................................................................... N. flagellifer View in CoL sp. nov.

- Tutorium concave anteriorly, with small lateral tooth; seta lm very short; seta ad3 extremely small. 542– 669 X 398–536Μm ............................................................................... N. monstruosus View in CoL (Jeleva et Vu, 1987)

11. Seate le, in and notogastral setae (c excluded) smooth basally, strongly barbed distally; notogaster ornamented with small tubercles. 595–730 X 380–495Μm ............................................ N. peniculatus View in CoL sp. nov.

- Setae le, in and notogastral setae either completely smooth or barbed ..................................................... 12

12. Notogastral setae la, lm, lp, h1, and h2 barbed, weakly broadened distally................................................ 13

- Notogastral setae la, lm, lp, h1, and h2 smooth, or slightly barbed, never broadened distally .................. 14

13. Prodorsal condyles separated, but each with median extension**; seta c twisted twice; other notogastral setae 10–20 in RLN. 515–655 X 340–438Μm ..................................................... N. yuwanensis Aoki, 1981 View in CoL

- Prodorsal condyles clearly separated from each other; seta c simple, not twisted; other notogastral setae 6– 14 in RLN. 610–615 X 420–425Μm .................................................................... N. tokaraensis Aoki, 1989 View in CoL

14. Notogastral setae rather long (RLN> 15) ................................................................................................. 15

- Notogastral setae short (RLN <12)........................................................................................................... 16

15. Bothridial seta expanded distally, rather short; notogastral setae smooth. 630–720 X 470–490Μm............. .................................................................................................................................. N. insolitus Aoki, 1959 View in CoL

- Bothridial seta slightly expanded medially, and then attenuate; notogastral setae slightly barbed. 655–690 X 448–485Μm ........................................................................................................ N. tamlaensis Choi, 1996 View in CoL

16. Setae ro, le and in distinctly barbed distally, bases of prodorsal condyles without bridge-like structures connecting each other, setae la and lm almost at same level, distances between h1 and h2 slightly shorter than that between lp and h2. 565 X 365Μm .................................................... N. pseudobrevisetiger View in CoL sp. nov.

- Setae ro, le and in smooth, bases of prodorsal condyles with bridge-like structures connecting each other, lm located behind level of la, distance between h1 and h2 distinctly longer than that between lp and h2. 555–625 X 385–460Μm ....................................................................................... N. brevisetiger Aoki, 1981 View in CoL

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Sarcoptiformes

SubOrder

Oribatida

Family

Nippobodidae

Genus

Nippobodes

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF